| Literature DB >> 27284275 |
Nalin N Wijayawardene1, Pedro W Crous2, Paul M Kirk3, David L Hawksworth4, Saranyaphat Boonmee5, Uwe Braun6, Dong-Qin Dai7, Melvina J D'souza8, Paul Diederich9, Asha Dissanayake10, Mingkhuan Doilom8, Singang Hongsanan8, E B Gareth Jones11, Johannes Z Groenewald12, Ruvishika Jayawardena13, James D Lawrey14, Jian-Kui Liu8, Robert Lücking15, Hugo Madrid16, Dimuthu S Manamgoda8, Lucia Muggia17, Matthew P Nelsen18, Rungtiwa Phookamsak7, Satinee Suetrong19, Kazuaki Tanaka20, Kasun M Thambugala8, Dhanushka N Wanasinghe8, Saowanee Wikee8, Ying Zhang21, André Aptroot22, H A Ariyawansa8, Ali H Bahkali23, D Jayarama Bhat24, Cécile Gueidan25, Putarak Chomnunti8, G Sybren De Hoog12, Kerry Knudsen26, Wen-Jing Li8, Eric H C McKenzie27, Andrew N Miller28, Alan J L Phillips29, Marcin Piątek30, Huzefa A Raja31, Roger S Shivas32, Bernad Slippers33, Joanne E Taylor34, Qing Tian35, Yong Wang36, Joyce H C Woudenberg12, Lei Cai37, Walter M Jaklitsch38, Kevin D Hyde1.
Abstract
Article 59.1, of the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (ICN; Melbourne Code), which addresses the nomenclature of pleomorphic fungi, became effective from 30 July 2011. Since that date, each fungal species can have one nomenclaturally correct name in a particular classification. All other previously used names for this species will be considered as synonyms. The older generic epithet takes priority over the younger name. Any widely used younger names proposed for use, must comply with Art. 57.2 and their usage should be approved by the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi (NCF). In this paper, we list all genera currently accepted by us in Dothideomycetes (belonging to 23 orders and 110 families), including pleomorphic and nonpleomorphic genera. In the case of pleomorphic genera, we follow the rulings of the current ICN and propose single generic names for future usage. The taxonomic placements of 1261 genera are listed as an outline. Protected names and suppressed names for 34 pleomorphic genera are listed separately. Notes and justifications are provided for possible proposed names after the list of genera. Notes are also provided on recent advances in our understanding of asexual and sexual morph linkages in Dothideomycetes. A phylogenetic tree based on four gene analyses supported 23 orders and 75 families, while 35 families still lack molecular data.Entities:
Keywords: Article 59.1; Ascomycota; One name; Phylogeny; Pleomorphism
Year: 2014 PMID: 27284275 PMCID: PMC4896388 DOI: 10.1007/s13225-014-0309-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fungal Divers ISSN: 1560-2745 Impact factor: 20.372