| Literature DB >> 35208181 |
Cui Wu1, Huijun Wang1, Zhenying Liu1, Bo Xu1, Zhuojun Li1, Pingping Song1, Zhimao Chao1.
Abstract
The differences in metabolites in male and female individuals of dioecious Morus alba L. (Moraceae) are usually ignored and lack study. In the present study, 58 leaves and 61 stem barks from male and female individuals were analyzed by untargeted metabolomics via headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) coupled with chemometrics, including principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). A total of 66 and 44 metabolites were identified from leaves and stem barks, respectively. Four and eight differential metabolites among candidate metabolites in leaves and stem barks from male and female individuals were identified. Moreover, females possessed stronger antioxidant activity than males. This is the first report where untargeted metabolomics coupled with chemometrics was used to analyze the different metabolites and to discriminate the gender of leaves and stem barks of dioecious M. alba. It provided the basis for further study of M. alba and reference value for researching dioecious plants.Entities:
Keywords: Morus alba L.; chemometrics; dioecious plant; leaves; stem barks; untargeted metabolomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35208181 PMCID: PMC8874686 DOI: 10.3390/metabo12020106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Figure 1Chemometrics of male and female leaf samples. (a) PCA score plot; (b) OPLS-DA score plot; (c) S-plot of OPLS-DA along with selected candidate differential metabolites (cut-off values of |p| ≥ 0.05 and |p(corr)| ≥ 0.5); (d) Heat-map and hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) analyses of metabolite contents in male and female leaf samples.
Differential metabolites for male and female leaves, filtered with VIP > 1, |p| ≥ 0.05 and |p(corr)| ≥ 0.5, ANOVA p value ≤ 0.05, and max fold change ≥ 1.5.
| No. | RT-EM | Mass Accuracy (ppm) | Formula | VIP | Max Fold Change | Compound | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | 4.21_448.1007n | 0.25 | C21H20O11 | 5.74 | 1.61 | Kaempferol 3-O-glucoside (astragalin) | [ |
| L2 | 4.40_534.1013n | 0.72 | C24H22O14 | 5.67 | 1.60 | Kaempferol 3-O-(6’’-O-malonylglucoside) | [ |
| L3 | 2.64_737.1904 | −4.06 | C33H40O20 | 1.33 | 1.72 | Quercetin O-rhamnosyl-O-rhamnosyl-O-hexoside | [ |
| L4 | 3.82_593.1516 | 0.70 | C27H30O15 | 3.61 | 1.74 | Kaempferol O-rhamnosyl-O-hexoside | [ |
n neutral molecular weight calculated according to adduct ion forms.
Figure 2Chemometrics of male and female stem bark samples. (a) PCA score plot; (b) OPLS-DA score plot; (c) S-plot of OPLS-DA along with selected candidate differential metabolites (cut-off values of |p| ≥0.05 and |p(corr)| ≥ 0.5); (d) Heat-map and HCA analyses of metabolite contents in male and female stem bark samples.
Differential metabolites for male and female stem barks, filtered with VIP > 1, |p| ≥ 0.05 and |p(corr)| ≥ 0.5, ANOVA p value ≤ 0.05, and max fold change ≥ 1.5.
| No. | RT-EM | Mass Accuracy (ppm) | Formula | VIP | Max Fold Change | Compound | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 0.60_173.1038 | −3.47 | C6H14N4O2 | 1.03 | 3.69 | Arginine | [ |
| B2 | 0.75_504.1689n | −0.23 | C18H32O16 | 3.10 | 1.59 | Raffinose | [ |
| B3 | 1.88_404.1312n | −1.68 | C17H24O11 | 1.88 | 1.64 | Gardenoside | * |
| B4 | 3.44_406.1255n | −2.11 | C20H22O9 | 3.75 | 2.29 | Astringin | [ |
| B5 | 3.87_390.1309n | −1.34 | C20H22O8 | 1.06 | 3.54 | Piceid | [ |
| B6 | 4.28_244.0731n | −2.06 | C14H12O4 | 4.38 | 2.05 | Oxyresveratrol | # |
| B7 | 5.27_458.1572n | −1.03 | C24H26O9 | 2.04 | 2.24 | Mulberroside C | * |
| B8 | 6.12_325.1078 | −1.2 | C19H18O5 | 1.33 | 4.27 | Moracinfurol A | * |
n neutral molecular weight calculated according to adduct ion forms; # confirmed with the MS and MS/MS spectra of reference standard; * confirmed with the mass error (ME), fragmentation score (FS), isotopic similarity (IS), and score of matched with an in-house library.
Figure 3The bubble chart of metabolic pathway analysis. a Arginine biosynthesis; b Galactose metabolism; c Arginine and proline metabolism.