| Literature DB >> 19357433 |
Mary S Kalamaki1, Dimitris Alexandrou, Diamanto Lazari, Georgios Merkouropoulos, Vasileios Fotopoulos, Irene Pateraki, Alexandros Aggelis, Armando Carrillo-López, Maria J Rubio-Cabetas, Angelos K Kanellis.
Abstract
A single copy of the N-acetyl-L-Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19357433 PMCID: PMC2671631 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Fig. 1.The L-arginine biosynthetic pathway and its association to proline and polyamine biosynthesis. NAGS, N-acetylglutamate synthase; NAGK, N-acetylglutamate kinase; NAGPR, N-acetylglutamate 5-phosphate reductase; NAOAT, N-acetylornithine transaminase; GAT, glutamate N-acetyltransferase; NAOD, N2-acetylornithine deacetylase; OCT, ornithine carbamoyltransferase; ASSY, argininosuccinate synthase; ASL, argininosuccinate lyase; δ-OAT, ornithine-δ-aminotransferase; P5CR, Δ1 pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase; P5CD, Δ1 pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase; ODC, ornithine decarboxylase; ADC, arginine decarboxylase; ADI, agmatine deiminase; CPA, N-carbamoylputrescine amidohydrolase; SPDS, spermidine synthase; SPMS, spermine synthase. In plants, NAGS and mainly NAGK present the possible regulation points of arginine biosynthesis since they are feedback-inhibited by arginine and alleviated by glutamate. Steps i–iv, the ornithine pathway; step v, the cyclic pathway; step vi: the linear pathway, steps vii–ix, the arginine pathway.
Fig. 2.Structure of the SlNAGS1 protein (A). The various sequence domains predicted by in silico analysis of the primary structure of the protein are indicated: light grey box, chloroplast transit peptide (as predicted by the ChloroP 1.1 software but not supported by experimental evidence); grey box, ArgB domain; grey-dotted box, GNAT domain. Amino acid positions at the beginning and end of each domain are indicated. Alignment of the tomato SlNAGS1 and the Pseudomonas aeruginosa (AAG08589) amino acid sequences (B). Amino acids that have been mutated in P. aeruginosa are grey shaded.
Fig. 3.Expression of NAGS in tomato vegetative tissues (A), during fruit ripening (B), and at low oxygen (air, 3%, 0.5%, 0% oxygen) and ethylene (10 ppm) conditions (C). Approximately 15 μg of total RNA were fractionated on denaturing agarose gels and after transfer to a positively charged nylon membrane was hybridized with a tomato NAGS probe labelled with 32P. Equal loading of the RNA and transfer efficiency were determined by methylene blue staining. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 4.Expression of tomato NAGS in selected lines of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants and in WT plants. Total RNA isolated from leaves of fully grown homozygous plants and after fractionation and transfer to nylon membrane was hybridized with a tomato NAGS probe labelled with 32P. Equal loading of the RNA and transfer efficiency were determined by methylene blue staining.
Fig. 5.Accumulation of ornithine, citrulline, and arginine in the leaves of WT and of three transformed lines. Wild-type and transgenic plants were grown to the mature rosette stage (before bolting commenced) and leaves were harvested for amino acid determinations. Data are means of three independent measurements. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean and an asterisk indicates statistically significant differences compared to WT plants.
Fig. 6.Germination ability of WT and selected transgenic seeds under salt pressure. Seeds of WT and transgenic lines were germinated on MS agar medium without the addition of salt or with 250 mM NaCl supplementation. Radicle emergence was scored as positive germination. Population proportions were calculated by dividing the total number of germinated seedlings by the initial seed number plated onto each plate for each genotype. Error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval for each population proportion.
Fig. 7.Response of transgenic and control plants to salt and drought stress after 7 d. Four-week-old plants were divided into three groups; one group was watered with H2O (A), the second group was watered with 300 mM NaCl (B), the third group was subjected to drought stress by withholding water (C). After withholding water for 7 d, the plants of this group were rewatered for 2 d (D). All plants were photographed using a digital camera.
Fig. 8.Response of transgenic and control plants to salt and drought stress. Four-week-old plants were divided into three groups; one group was watered with a solution of 300 mM NaCl, another group was subjected to drought stress by withholding water, while the third group continued its normal watering routine. Six rosette leaves from three individual plants per sample were harvested for chlorophyll measurement 7 d after stress imposition. Total chlorophyll content was estimated spectrophotometrically after extraction in DMSO. Data represent means ±SE of three measurements.
Fig. 9.Phylogenetic analysis of a total of 44 NAGS-related sequences from a variety of organisms. This analysis, which enriched and updated the previous analysis by Qu , was performed using the MEGA ver. 4.1 software (Tamura ). The phylogenetic relationship between the examined sequences was performed using the Neighbor–Joining method with p-distance correction. Bootstrap values were derived from 1000 replicate runs. Accession numbers together with the amino acid sequences used, are given in Supplementary Fig. S1 at JXB online. The following organisms were used in the phylogenetic analysis: A. thaliana (Arabidopsis thaliana) Arabidopsis; B. taurus (Bos taurus) cow; C. albicans (Candida albicans); D. rerio (Danio rerio) zebrafish; E. coli (Escherichia coli); H. sapiens (Homo sapiens) human; M. musculus (Mus musculus) mouse; N. crassa (Neurospora crassa); N. gonorrhoeae (Neisseria gonorrhoeae); O. sativa (Oryza sativa) rice; P. patens (Physcomitrella patens) moss; P. syringae (Pseudomonas syringae); P. aeruginosa (Pseudomonas aeruginosa); R. eutropha (Ralstonia eutropha); S. lycopersicum (Solanum lycopersicum) tomato; S. cerevisiae (Saccharomyces cerevisiae); S. typhimurium (Salmonella typhimurium); S. cerevisiae (Saccharomyces cerevisiae); S. pombe (Schizosaccharomyces pombe); T. nigroviridis (Tetraodon nigroviridis) freshwater pufferfish; T. maritime (Thermotoga maritime); X. campestris (Xanthomonas campestris); X. axonopodis (Xanthomonas axonopodis); X. fastidiosa (Xylella fastidiosa); V. vinifera (Vitis vinifera) grape; Z. mays (Zea mays) corn.