| Literature DB >> 35205768 |
Marta Grzeski1, Eliane T Taube2, Elena I Braicu3, Jalid Sehouli3, Véronique Blanchard1, Oliver Klein4.
Abstract
The particularly high mortality of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is in part linked to limited understanding of its molecular signatures. Although there are data available on in situ N-glycosylation in EOC tissue, previous studies focused primarily on neutral N-glycan species and, hence, still little is known regarding EOC tissue-specific sialylation. In this proof-of-concept study, we implemented MALDI mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) in combination with sialic acid derivatization to simultaneously investigate neutral and sialylated N-glycans in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue microarray specimens of less common EOC histotypes and non-malignant borderline ovarian tumor (BOT). The applied protocol allowed detecting over 50 m/z species, many of which showed differential tissue distribution. Most importantly, it could be demonstrated that α2,6- and α2,3-sialylated N-glycans are enriched in tissue regions corresponding to tumor and adjacent tumor-stroma, respectively. Interestingly, analogous N-glycosylation patterns were observed in tissue cores of BOT, suggesting that regio-specific N-glycan distribution might occur already in non-malignant ovarian pathologies. All in all, our data provide proof that the combination of MALDI-MSI and sialic acid derivatization is suitable for delineating regio-specific N-glycan distribution in EOC and BOT tissues and might serve as a promising strategy for future glycosylation-based biomarker discovery studies.Entities:
Keywords: EOC; MALDI-MSI; imaging; in situ N-glycosylation; ovarian cancer; sialylation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35205768 PMCID: PMC8870006 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Figure 1Schematic representation of the analytical workflow used in this study.
N-Glycan structures detected by MALDI-MSI across all investigated tissue specimens (LGSOC n = 4, CCC n = 6, EC n = 7, BOT n = 7).
| Composition | Neg | LGSOC | CCC | EC | BOT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1136.40 | H3N3 | |||||
| 1257.42 | H5N2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 1282.45 | H3N3F1 | |||||
| 1298.45 | H4N3 | |||||
| 1339.48 | H3N4 | |||||
| 1419.48 | H6N2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 1444.51 | H4N3F1 | ✓ | ||||
| 1485.53 | H3N4F1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 1501.53 | H4N4 | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| 1581.53 | H7N2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 1616.60 | H4N3D1 | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| 1647.59 | H4N4F1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 1663.58 | H5N4 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 1688.61 | H3N5F1 | ✓ | ||||
| 1704.61 | H4N5 | ✓ | ||||
| 1743.58 | H8N2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 1762.65 | H4N3F1D1 | ✓ | ||||
| 1778.64 | H5N3D1 | ✓ | ||||
| 1809.64 | H5N4F1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 1819.68 | H4N4D1 | ✓ | ||||
| 1825.63 | H6N4 | ✓ | ||||
| 1850.67 | H4N5F1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 1866.66 | H5N5 | ✓ | ||||
| 1891.69 | H3N6F1 | |||||
| 1905.63 | H9N2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 1937.70 | H4N4F1A1 | |||||
| 1953.70 | H5N4A1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 1965.73 | H4N4F1D1 | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| 1981.73 | H5N4D1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 2012.72 | H5N5F1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 2028.71 | H6N5 | ✓ | ||||
| 2053.75 | H4N6F1 | |||||
| 2099.76 | H5N4F1A1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 2127.79 | H5N4F1D1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 2168.82 | H4N5F1D1 | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| 2174.77 | H6N5F1 | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| 2184.80 | H5N5D1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 2243.81 | H5N4A2 | ✓ | ||||
| 2271.85 | H5N4A1D1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 2299.88 | H5N4D2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 2330.87 | H5N5F1D1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 2346.86 | H6N5D1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 2389.88 | H5N4F1A2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 2417.91 | H5N4F1A1D1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 2445.94 | H5N4F1D2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 2464.89 | H6N5F1A1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 2492.91 | H6N5F1D1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 2502.95 | H5N5D2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 2539.90 | H7N6F1 | |||||
| 2636.97 | H6N5A1D1 | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| 2649.00 | H5N5F1D2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 2665.00 | H6N5D2 | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| 2696.00 | H6N6F1D1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 2755.00 | H6N5F1A2 | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| 2783.03 | H6N5F1A1D1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 2811.06 | H6N5F1D2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 2830.01 | H7N6F1A1 | |||||
| 2858.05 | H7N6F1D1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 2955.11 | H6N5A1D2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 2983.14 | H6N5D3 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 3045.12 | H6N5F1A3 | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| 3073.14 | H6N5F1A2D1 | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| 3101.17 | H6N5F1A1D2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 3148.16 | H7N6F1A1D1 | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| 3158.19 | H6N6A1D2 | ✓ | ✓ |
Neg–negative control; ✓—detected peak. N-Glycan composition is given in terms of H, hexose; N, N-acetylhexosamine; F, fucose; A, amidated sialic acid; and D, dimethylamidated sialic acid.
Figure 2Average [M+Na]+ MALDI imaging mass spectra of all investigated tissue specimens (LGSOC n = 4, CCC n = 6, EC n = 7, BOT n = 7). N-glycan compositions of indicated m/z species are shown in Table 1. For each TMA slide, only one representative tissue core is shown. Blue dots: non-carbohydrate contaminants.
Figure 3Spatial distribution of two differently sialylated N-glycan structures in an exemplary LGSOC tissue core as determined by MALDI-MSI.
Figure 4H&E stains of exemplary TMA cores investigated in this study. Tumor regions are marked in red, whereas tumor-stroma is marked in green.
The most discriminative N-glycan structures as determined by ROC curve analyses of tumor vs. tumor-stroma and tumor-stroma vs. tumor regions in LGSOC (n = 4), CCC (n = 6), EC (n = 7), and BOT (n = 7) tissue specimens.
| Tumor vs. Tumor-stroma | |||||||||||
| LGSOC | CCC | EC | BOT | ||||||||
|
| Composition | AUC |
| Composition | AUC |
| Composition | AUC |
| Composition | AUC |
| - | - | - | 1743.6 | H8N2 | 0.658 | 1981.7 | H5N4D1 | 0.740 | 2330.9 | H5N5F1D1 | 0.806 |
| 2330.9 | H5N5F1D1 | 0.735 | 2649.0 | H5N5F1D2 | 0.775 | ||||||
| 2445.9 | H5N4F1D2 | 0.728 | 1905.6 | H9N2 | 0.759 | ||||||
| 2127.8 | H5N4F1D1 | 0.727 | 1419.5 | H6N2 | 0.758 | ||||||
| 1647.6 | H4N4F1 | 0.722 | 2346.9 | H6N5D1 | 0.732 | ||||||
| 2492.9 | H6N5F1D1 | 0.682 | 2696.0 | H6N6F1D1 | 0.724 | ||||||
| 1419.5 | H6N2 | 0.670 | 1581.5 | H7N2 | 0.719 | ||||||
| 1581.5 | H7N2 | 0.667 | 3101.2 | H6N5F1A1D2 | 0.700 | ||||||
| Tumor-stroma vs. Tumor | |||||||||||
| LGSOC | CCC | EC | BOT | ||||||||
|
| Composition | AUC |
| Composition | AUC |
| Composition | AUC |
| Composition | AUC |
| - | - | - | 2099.8 | H5N4F1A1 | 0.901 | 2389.9 | H5N4F1A2 | 0.757 | 2099.8 | H5N4F1A1 | 0.743 |
| 1953.7 | H5N4A1 | 0.825 | 2099.8 | H5N4A1 | 0.734 | 1809.6 | H5N4F1 | 0.670 | |||
| 1981.7 | H5N4D1 | 0.822 | 2012.7 | H5N5F1 | 0.662 | ||||||
| 2955.1 | H6N5A1D2 | 0.815 | |||||||||
| 2665.0 | H6N5D2 | 0.774 | |||||||||
Only N-glycan structures with AUC > 0.65 are shown. In the case of EC and BOT, eight N-glycan structures with the highest AUC values are shown.
Figure 5ROC curves and MALDI-MSI pictures of the most discriminatory N-glycan structures as determined for tumor and tumor-stroma in CCC (n = 6), EC (n = 7), and BOT (n = 7) TMA specimens. Annotation of tissue regions is shown only for one representative core of each histotype. Tumor regions are marked in red, whereas tumor-stroma is marked in green.