Oliver Klein1,2, Frederic Kanter3, Hagen Kulbe1,4,5, Paul Jank1,6, Carsten Denkert1,6, Grit Nebrich1,2, Wolfgang D Schmitt1,6, Zhiyang Wu1,2, Catarina A Kunze1,6, Jalid Sehouli1,4,5, Silvia Darb-Esfahani1,7, Ioana Braicu1,4,5, Jan Lellmann3, Herbert Thiele5, Eliane T Taube1,6. 1. Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany. 2. Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany. 3. Institute of Mathematics and Image Computing, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. 4. Department of Gynecology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany. 5. Fraunhofer-Institute for Medical Image Computing, MEVIS, 23562, Lübeck, Germany. 6. Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany. 7. Institute of Pathology Spandau, 13589, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Precise histological classification of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has immanent diagnostic and therapeutic consequences, but remains challenging in histological routine. The aim of this pilot study is to examine the potential of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) imaging mass spectrometry in combination with machine learning methods to classify EOC histological subtypes from tissue microarray. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded tissue of 20 patients with ovarian clear-cell, 14 low-grade serous, 19 high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas, and 14 serous borderline tumors are analyzed using MALDI-Imaging. Classifications are computed by linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machines with linear (SVM-lin) and radial basis function kernels (SVM-rbf), a neural network (NN), and a convolutional neural network (CNN). RESULTS: MALDI-Imaging and machine learning methods result in classification of EOC histotypes with mean accuracy of 80% for LDA, 80% SVM-lin, 74% SVM-rbf, 83% NN, and 85% CNN. Based on sensitivity (69-100%) and specificity (90-99%), CCN and NN are most suited to EOC classification. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The pilot study demonstrates the potential of MALDI-Imaging derived proteomic classifiers in combination with machine learning algorithms to discriminate EOC histotypes. Applications may support the development of new prognostic parameters in the assessment of EOC.
PURPOSE: Precise histological classification of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has immanent diagnostic and therapeutic consequences, but remains challenging in histological routine. The aim of this pilot study is to examine the potential of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) imaging mass spectrometry in combination with machine learning methods to classify EOC histological subtypes from tissue microarray. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded tissue of 20 patients with ovarian clear-cell, 14 low-grade serous, 19 high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas, and 14 serous borderline tumors are analyzed using MALDI-Imaging. Classifications are computed by linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machines with linear (SVM-lin) and radial basis function kernels (SVM-rbf), a neural network (NN), and a convolutional neural network (CNN). RESULTS: MALDI-Imaging and machine learning methods result in classification of EOC histotypes with mean accuracy of 80% for LDA, 80% SVM-lin, 74% SVM-rbf, 83% NN, and 85% CNN. Based on sensitivity (69-100%) and specificity (90-99%), CCN and NN are most suited to EOC classification. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The pilot study demonstrates the potential of MALDI-Imaging derived proteomic classifiers in combination with machine learning algorithms to discriminate EOC histotypes. Applications may support the development of new prognostic parameters in the assessment of EOC.
Authors: Thomas G Papathomas; Na Sun; Vasileios Chortis; Angela E Taylor; Wiebke Arlt; Susan Richter; Graeme Eisenhofer; Gerard Ruiz-Babot; Leonardo Guasti; Axel Karl Walch Journal: Histochem Cell Biol Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 4.304
Authors: Florian N Loch; Oliver Klein; Katharina Beyer; Frederick Klauschen; Christian Schineis; Johannes C Lauscher; Georgios A Margonis; Claudius E Degro; Wael Rayya; Carsten Kamphues Journal: Biology (Basel) Date: 2021-10-12
Authors: Marta Grzeski; Eliane T Taube; Elena I Braicu; Jalid Sehouli; Véronique Blanchard; Oliver Klein Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Rami N Al-Rohil; Jessica L Moore; Nathan Heath Patterson; Sarah Nicholson; Nico Verbeeck; Marc Claesen; Jameelah Z Muhammad; Richard M Caprioli; Jeremy L Norris; Sara Kantrow; Margaret Compton; Jason Robbins; Ahmed K Alomari Journal: J Cutan Pathol Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 1.587
Authors: Dagmara Pietkiewicz; Agnieszka Horała; Szymon Plewa; Piotr Jasiński; Ewa Nowak-Markwitz; Zenon J Kokot; Jan Matysiak Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Wanja Kassuhn; Oliver Klein; Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Hedwig Lammert; Sylwia Handzik; Eliane T Taube; Wolfgang D Schmitt; Carlotta Keunecke; David Horst; Felix Dreher; Joshy George; David D Bowtell; Oliver Dorigo; Michael Hummel; Jalid Sehouli; Nils Blüthgen; Hagen Kulbe; Elena I Braicu Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 6.639