| Literature DB >> 35204279 |
Yu-Ting Tsao1, Wei-Chi Wu1,2, Kuan-Jen Chen1,2, Chun-Fu Liu2,3,4, Yi-Jen Hsueh1,5, Chao-Min Cheng6, Hung-Chi Chen1,2,5.
Abstract
Cataract is the leading cause of blindness throughout the world. Currently, the cataract severity evaluation is based on the subjective LOCS III guideline. To ameliorate the evaluation system and develop an objective and quantitative analysis, we investigated the relationships among aqueous humor total antioxidant capacity (AqTAC), ascorbic acid (AqAA) concentration, and cataract severity. In this study, we enrolled 130 cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification between April 2019 and March 2020. The AqTAC and AqAA were measured by our own developed TAC assay and commercially available kit. Cataract severity was recorded by nuclear opalescence (NO) and cortical cataract (CC) degree according to LOCS III. Cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) during phacoemulsification was recorded to verify the severity of the cataract. As a result, we found a moderate correlation between AqTAC and CDE (p < 0.001). In addition, we found AqTAC independently associated with the CDE when analyzed by multivariate linear regression (p < 0.001). AqTAC also negatively correlated to cataract severity when measured by NO and CC (p = 0.012 in NO grade 3 vs. grade 1; p = 0.012 in CC grade 2 vs. grade 1; p < 0.001 in CC grade 3 vs. grade 1). We further found AqAA provided 71.9 ± 13.5% of AqTAC, and showed a high correlation (rho = 0.79, p < 0.001). In conclusion, we found a significant correlation between AqTAC/AqAA and cataract severity measured by CDE. The correlation was superior to the correlation between LOCS III and CDE. Aqueous humor TAC owns the potential to assess cataracts in an objective and quantitative way.Entities:
Keywords: ascorbic acid; cataract; cataract prevention; cataract severity; total antioxidant capacity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35204279 PMCID: PMC8869206 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11020397
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1Schematic diagram illustrating the hypothetical correlations between oxidative stress, aqueous humor antioxidant capacity, and cataract severity. The ocular lens is continuously exposed to oxidative stresses such as sunlight. Oxidative injury and subsequent cataract formation are the likely results of such oxidative exposure accumulated through aging. However, aqueous humor antioxidant capacity, which is primarily composed of ascorbic acid, could postpone senility and protect the lens from cataract progression. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 20 December 2021).
Patient characteristics (n = 130).
| Basic Characteristics | |
|---|---|
| OD/OS, | 59/71 |
| Age, mean ± SD (Years) | 67.6 ± 8.9 |
| Gender, M/F | 67 (51.5%)/63 (48.5%) |
| BMI, mean ± SD (Kg/m2) | 24.95 ± 3.49 |
| Disease diagnosis, | ARC: 116 (89.2%) Juvenile cataract: 14 (10.8%) |
| Underlying Diseases | |
| Hypertension, | 51 (39.2%) |
| Diabetes mellitus, | 28 (21.5%) |
| Other underlying systemic diseases, | 55 (42.3%) |
ARC = age-related cataract; BMI = body mass index; F = female; M = male; OD = oculus dextrus; OS = oculus sinister; SD = standard deviation. Other systemic diseases include dyslipidemia, heart diseases, kidney diseases, lung diseases, liver diseases, stroke, immunocompromised status, and autoimmune diseases.
Figure 2Histogram showing the distribution of aqueous humor total antioxidant capacity (TAC) in cataract patients. The data were normally distributed. The mean aqueous humor TAC was 1.643 ± 0.370 mM ascorbic acid equivalent antioxidant capacity (AAEAC) with the highest level of 2.279 mM AAEAC and the lowest level of 0.396 mM AAEAC.
Figure 3Graphs showing the aqueous humor ascorbic acid (AA) concentrations in cataract patients and its correlation to total antioxidant capacity (TAC): (A) histogram showing the left-skewed distribution of aqueous humor AA concentrations in cataract patients with a mean value of 1.198 ± 0.355 mM; (B) scatter plot showing the high correlation between aqueous humor AA concentrations and TAC with a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.79 (p value < 0.001); (C) pie chart showing the proportional correlation between aqueous humor AA concentrations and TAC. The AA averagely contributed to 71.9% of the aqueous humor TAC in cataract patients.
Figure 4Scatter plot showing the correlation between aqueous humor total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) during phacoemulsification in cataract patients. There is a medium degree of correlation between aqueous humor TAC and CDE during the phacoemulsification process in cataract patients. The Spearman correlation coefficient was −0.31 (p value < 0.001).
Figure 5Scatter plot showing the correlation between aqueous humor ascorbic acid concentration and cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) during phacoemulsification in cataract patients. There is a medium degree of correlation between aqueous humor ascorbic acid concentration and CDE during the phacoemulsification process in cataract patients. The Spearman correlation coefficient was −0.23 (p value = 0.01).
Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses for cumulative dissipated energy during the phacoemulsification process.
| Variable | Univariate Regression | Multivariate Regression | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | B | SE | |||
| Total antioxidant capacity | −18.62 | 4.85 | <0.001 *** | −18.47 | 4.89 | <0.001 *** |
| Basic characteristics | ||||||
| OD/OS | 0.31 | 3.79 | 0.934 | −0.128 | 3.53 | 0.971 |
| Age | 0.45 | 0.21 | 0.034 * | 0.719 | 0.27 | 0.008 ** |
| Gender | −2.58 | 3.77 | 0.496 | 1.130 | 3.65 | 0.758 |
| BMI | −0.01 | 0.54 | 0.99 | −0.426 | 0.55 | 0.444 |
| Disease diagnosis | −0.11 | 6.09 | 0.986 | 13.92 | 7.82 | 0.078 |
| Underlying disease | ||||||
| Hypertension | 0.61 | 3.87 | 0.876 | 0.676 | 4.3 | 0.875 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 11.4 | 4.48 | 0.012 * | 8.623 | 4.44 | 0.055 |
| Other underlying | −3.73 | 3.81 | 0.329 | −3.996 | 4.03 | 0.323 |
B = beta coefficient; BMI = body mass index; OD = oculus dextrus; OS = oculus sinister; SE = standard error. Age, eye site, gender, body mass index, disease diagnosis, and underlying diseases were adjusted in the multivariate regression as confounding factors. p value of the multivariate regression model is 0.001. Other systemic diseases include dyslipidemia, heart diseases, kidney diseases, lung diseases, liver diseases, stroke, immunocompromised status, and autoimmune diseases. *: p-value < 0.05; **: p-value < 0.01; ***: p-value <0.001.
Univariate and multivariate ordinal logistic regression analyses for total antioxidant capacity on cataract severity of nuclear opalescence and cortical cataract.
| Crude Odds Ratio | Adjusted Odds Ratio | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||
| Nuclear Opalescence | ||||
| Grade 2 vs. Grade 1 | 0.453 (0.04–5.18) | 0.524 | 0.348 (0.028–4.301) | 0.411 |
| Grade 3 vs. Grade 1 | 0.11 (0.016–0.735) | 0.023 * | 0.078 (0.011–0.571) | 0.012 * |
| Cortical Cataract | ||||
| Grade 2 vs. Grade 1 | 0.027 (0.001–1.055) | 0.053 | 0.001 (0–0.355) | 0.02 * |
| Grade 3 vs. Grade 1 | 0.005 (0–0.147) | 0.002 ** | < 0.001 (0–0.051) | <0.001 *** |
OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval. Age, eye site, gender, body mass index, disease diagnosis, and underlying diseases were adjusted as the confounding factors. *: p-value < 0.05; **: p-value < 0.01; ***: p-value < 0.001.
Figure 6Scatter plot showing the correlation between aqueous humor total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement following cataract surgery. There was no significant correlation between aqueous humor TAC and BCVA improvement after surgery. The Spearman correlation coefficient was −0.045 (p value = 0.658). The BCVA was converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) values for analysis.
Figure 7Scatter plot showing the correlation between aqueous humor total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) after cataract surgery. There was no significant correlation between aqueous humor TAC and IOP changes after surgery. The Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.027 (p value = 0.785).
The published measuring methods to evaluate total antioxidant capacity in aqueous humor.
| Reference | Total Antioxidant | Sample Size | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aksoy et al. 2001 [ | 0.41 ± 0.04 | 16 | Spectrophotometric method (elimination of ABTSR+) |
| Mancino et al. 2011 [ | 0.94 ± 0.26 | 14 | Fluorescence method (inhibit the peroxidation of β-phycoerythrin) |
| Sorkhabi et al. 2011 [ | 0.34 ± 0.15 | 27 | Spectrophotometric method (elimination of ABTS+) |
| Beyazyıldız et al. 2013 [ | 2.54 ± 0.71 | 33 | Colorimetric change in Fe2+ |
| Nucci et al. 2013 [ | 0.963 ± 0.302 | 26 | Fluorescence method (inhibit the peroxidation of β-phycoerythrin) |
| Beyazyıldız et al. 2014 [ | 2.5 ± 0.7 | 25 | Colorimetric change in Fe2+ |
| Kirboga et al. 2014 [ | 0.65 ± 0.09 | 22 | Colorimetric method (reduction of 2,2′-azino-bis radical) |
| Ergan et al. 2016 [ | 1.80 ± 0.79 | 31 | Colorimetric method (inhibit oxidation of H2O2) |
| Kulaksızoglu et al. 2016 [ | 0.77 ± 0.07 | 35 | TAS kit (unknown mechanism) |
| Altinisik et al. 2018 [ | 0.78 ± 0.46 | 28 | Colorimetric change in Fe2+ |
| Bozkurt et al. 2019 [ | 0.39 [0.39–0.44] | 28 | Colorimetric immunodiagnostic assay (H2O2 elimination) |
| Siegfried et al. 2019 [ | 0.479 ± 0.146 | 72 | Luminescence method (elimination of alkyl peroxyl radicals) |