| Literature DB >> 21633716 |
Raffaele Mancino1, Donato Di Pierro, Chiara Varesi, Angelica Cerulli, Alessandra Feraco, Claudio Cedrone, Maria Dolores Pinazo-Duran, Massimiliano Coletta, Carlo Nucci.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate levels of malondialdehyde and the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) in the blood, aqueous humor, and vitreous bodies of diabetic and nondiabetic patients. We also measured the blood energy charge potential (ECP).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21633716 PMCID: PMC3103745
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Vis ISSN: 1090-0535 Impact factor: 2.367
Figure 1Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in the blood, aqueous humor and vitreous of diabetic patients and controls. The levels of MDA were measured by High Performance Liquid chromatography in the blood, aqueous humor and vitreous of the control (white columns), non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR; gray columns) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR; black columns) groups. Blood MDA levels in PDR patients were significantly increased over those of control and NPDR group (both, p<0.001). In the aqueous humor no significant differences between the groups were found. In the vitreous body, PDR patients, but not NPDR subjects, had increased MDA levels as compared with controls (p=0.050). Data are expressed in µmol/ml and represent mean±standard deviation (bars). ANOVA test was used.
Figure 2Total antioxidant capacity in the blood, aqueous humor, and vitreous of control and diabetic patients. The total antioxidant capacity (TAC) was measured by the oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay in the blood, aqueous humor and vitreous of controls (white columns) and of patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR; gray columns) and with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR; black columns). The control group displayed significantly higher TAC levels than diabetic sub-groups in both the vitreous (p<0.001) and aqueous humor (p=0.003). No significant differences were observed in blood. Similar findings emerged from subgroup analyses. PDR patients had decreased TACs in the vitreous and aqueous humors as compared with control subjects (p=0.002 and p=0.003 respectively) and with the NPDR patient subgroup (p<0.001 and p=0.032 respectively). Data are expressed in µmol Trolox Equi/g and represent mean±standard deviation (bars). ANOVA test analysis was used.