| Literature DB >> 35203601 |
Kehua Chen1,2,3, Peng Wang1,2,3, Jingrun Chen1,2, Yiling Ying1,2,3, Yi Chen3, Eric Gilson3,4,5, Yiming Lu1,2,3, Jing Ye1,2,3.
Abstract
Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is a key DNA damage signaling kinase that is mutated in humans with ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) syndrome. This syndrome is characterized by neurodegeneration, immune abnormality, cancer predisposition, and premature aging. To better understand the function of ATM in vivo, we engineered a viable zebrafish model with a mutated atm gene. Zebrafish atm loss-of-function mutants show characteristic features of A-T-like motor disturbance, including coordination disorders, immunodeficiency, and tumorigenesis. The immunological disorder of atm homozygote fish is linked to the developmental blockade of hematopoiesis, which occurs at the adulthood stage and results in a decrease in infection defense but, with little effect on wound healing. Malignant neoplasms found in atm mutant fish were mainly nerve sheath tumors and myeloid leukemia, which rarely occur in A-T patients or Atm-/- mice. These results underscore the importance of atm during immune cell development. This zebrafish A-T model opens up a pathway to an improved understanding of the molecular basis of tumorigenesis in A-T and the cellular role of atm.Entities:
Keywords: ATM; immune deficiency; regeneration; tumorigenesis; zebrafish
Year: 2022 PMID: 35203601 PMCID: PMC8962326 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10020392
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059
Figure 1Mutant schema of atm and infertility phenotype. (A) Cas9-based engineering system of the atm introduced a stop code before functional domain. (B) Relative expression level of atm mRNA at different location (shown in (A)) of atm+/− and atm−/− zebrafish compared to WT (n = 3). (C) General observation of wild-type and atm−/− zebrafish at 6 months old. (D) Gender ratio of atm−/− compared with WT zebrafish (Over 50 fish each group were calculate). (E) HE stains of testis. SG, spermatogonia; SC, spermatocyte; ST, spermatid; SZ, spermatozoa. (F) Ratio of each stage of meiosis in atm−/− zebrafish testis compared to WT (n = 3). The statistical significance was analyzed using the two-tailed Student’s t-test. Data are shown as means ± SEM.
Figure 2Behavior test of atm−/− zebrafish. (A) Trajectory diagram of 6-month-old WT, atm+/− and atm−/− zebrafish in 60-minue open-field tracking test. (B) Average speed of 6 months old WT, atm+/−, and atm−/− zebrafish in A (n = 9 for WT and atm−/−; n = 4 for atm+/-). (C) Activity diagram of WT, atm+/−, and atm−/− zebrafish in 60-minues open-field quantification test. (D) Highly activation duration of WT, atm+/−, and atm−/− zebrafish (n = 6 for WT; n = 7 for atm−/−; n = 4 for atm+/−). The statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Data are shown as means ± SEM.
Figure 3Loss of atm in zebrafish causing premature death, immunol deficiency, and regeneration abnormality. (A) Life span of WT and atm−/− zebrafish. (B) Causes of death in WT and atm−/− zebrafish. (C) Kidney marrow anatomy and anti-acid staining of infective tissue. (D–F) Whole-embryo in situ hybridization on atm−/− and WT zebrafish. (D) Representative images of gata1 expression (black arrows) in WT and atm−/− embryos at 24-hpf (top). Quantification of the gata1 signal (bottom) (n = 40 for WT; n = 21 for atm−/−). (E) Representative images of mpo expression (black arrow) in WT and atm−/− embryos at 24-hpf (top). Quantification of the mpo signals (bottom) (n = 45 for WT; n = 22 for atm−/−). (F) Representative images of rag1 expression (black arrow) in WT and atm−/− embryos at 5-dpf (top). Quantification of the rag1 signal (bottom) (n = 36 for WT; n = 26 for atm−/−). (G) General observation of regeneration ability of atm−/− zebrafish’s caudal fin amputation. Ratio of tail recovery is quantified (n = 12 for each group). The statistical significance is analyzed using the two-tailed Student’s t-test. Data are shown in means ± SEM.
Statistics of pigment recovery in WT and atm−/− fish after amputation.
| Pigment Recovery | ||
| Genotypes | Yes | No |
| WT | 12 | 0 |
|
| 2 | 10 |
Fisher’s exact test: p value < 0.0001.
Figure 4Tumorigenesis in atm−/− zebrafish. (A) Kidney marrow anatomy of WT and atm−/− zebrafish. (B) HE staining of kidney marrow shown in A. (C) Spleen of WT and atm−/− zebrafish. (D) HE staining of spleen shown in (C). (E) Flow cytometry analysis of cells extracted from the kidney of 12-month-old WT and atm−/− zebrafish (left). Quantification of percentage of lymphocytes, monocytes, and precursors (right) (n = 7 for each group). (F) Immunochemistry of kidney tumor from atm−/− fish compared to WT kidney (left). Quantification of mpx-positive signals area (right) (n = 19 for WT; n = 14 for atm−/−). (G) Neoplasm in the eyes of atm−/− zebrafish. (H) HE staining of neoplasm in the eyes of atm−/− zebrafish compared with the WT eyes. The statistical significance was analyzed using the two-tailed Student’s t-test. Data are shown in means ± SEM.