| Literature DB >> 35203328 |
Riikka Lampinen1, Mohammad Feroze Fazaludeen1, Simone Avesani2, Tiit Örd1, Elina Penttilä3, Juha-Matti Lehtola4,5, Toni Saari4, Sanna Hannonen4,5, Liudmila Saveleva1, Emma Kaartinen1, Francisco Fernández Acosta1, Marcela Cruz-Haces1, Heikki Löppönen3, Alan Mackay-Sim6, Minna U Kaikkonen1, Anne M Koivisto4,5,7, Tarja Malm1, Anthony R White8, Rosalba Giugno2, Sweelin Chew1, Katja M Kanninen1.
Abstract
Olfaction is orchestrated by olfactory mucosal cells located in the upper nasal cavity. Olfactory dysfunction manifests early in several neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer's disease, however, disease-related alterations to the olfactory mucosal cells remain poorly described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the olfactory mucosa differences between cognitively healthy individuals and Alzheimer's disease patients. We report increased amyloid-beta secretion in Alzheimer's disease olfactory mucosal cells and detail cell-type-specific gene expression patterns, unveiling 240 differentially expressed disease-associated genes compared to the cognitively healthy controls, and five distinct cell populations. Overall, alterations of RNA and protein metabolism, inflammatory processes, and signal transduction were observed in multiple cell populations, suggesting their role in Alzheimer's disease-related olfactory mucosa pathophysiology. Furthermore, the single-cell RNA-sequencing proposed alterations in gene expression of mitochondrially located genes in AD OM cells, which were verified by functional assays, demonstrating altered mitochondrial respiration and a reduction of ATP production. Our results reveal disease-related changes of olfactory mucosal cells in Alzheimer's disease and demonstrate the utility of single-cell RNA sequencing data for investigating molecular and cellular mechanisms associated with the disease.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; amyloid beta; mitochondria; olfactory mucosa; single-cell RNA-sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35203328 PMCID: PMC8870160 DOI: 10.3390/cells11040676
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1Aβ secretion is increased in AD OM cells. OM cells harvested from biopsies were plated cultured for 7 days prior to collection of culture media and cell lysates for ELISA assays. The results were normalized to the total amount of protein measured from cell lysates. (a) ELISA assay for Aβ1–42. (b) ELISA assay for Aβ1–40. (c) Ratio of Aβ1–42 over Aβ1–40. In Aβ ELISA assays, n = 11 for cognitively healthy controls and n = 10 for Alzheimer’s disease patients. (d) ELISA assay for total tau. (e) ELISA assay for P181-tau. In tau ELISA assays, n = 8 for cognitively healthy controls and n = 9 for AD patients. Quantification of secreted and intracellular Aβ1–42, Aβ1–40, tau, and P181-tau between control and AD OM cells were performed with t test (unpaired, two-tailed, Welch’s correction 2-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple test). (a) * p < 0.05. (c) ** p < 0.01. For all graphs, data are presented as mean ± SD and calculated the statistics as a difference in means ± SEM. (f) The levels of secreted Aβ1–42 were not found to correlate to the status of the donor’s sense of smell. OM cells harvested from biopsies were cultured for 7 days prior to the ELISA assay, assessing levels of Aβ1–42 in media collected from OM cells. The results were normalized to the total amount of protein measured from cell lysates and then separated into subgroups based on the sense of smell status of the biopsy donor.
Figure 2ScRNA-seq data revealed AD-specific alterations in OM cells. (a) Schematic illustration of the sample material and scRNA-seq workflow. (b) UMAP visualization of the clustering of single cells and showing by colors the cells derived from individual cognitively healthy donors or patients with AD. (c) Annotated cell types in samples derived from cognitively healthy individuals and patients with AD. (d) Proportion (%) of the cells of the total samples derived from each cell type. Under each sample, ID shows the total number of cells for each sample (e) Heatmap depicting a subset of the AD-related genes differentially expressed between AD and control libraries. The data are presented as the average of the log normalized and scaled expressions of the most differentially expressed genes (avg(log2FC) < −0.4, avg(log2FC) > 0.4) in AD and control cells.
Figure 3Cell-type-specific pathways altered in AD. (a) Heatmap depicting differential gene expression at the single-cell level for the most differentially expressed genes for each annotated cell type separated between donors with AD and cognitively healthy individuals. Each expression of the values is scaled and centered in 0. The range of expression values is from −4 to 4. (b) Numbers of differentially expressed AD-related genes by cell types common for controls and AD shown as table and Venn diagram. (c) The top five up-regulated and down-regulated AD-related genes differentially expressed between control and AD OM by cell types. The expression range is scaled between 1 and −1. (d) Heatmap of the subset of differentially expressed pathways for cell types common between AD and controls shows GSVA enrichment score of the pathways obtained for the DEGs with adjusted p-value < 0.05. The enrichment score range is from −0.6 to 0.6. (GBC, globose basal cell-like cells). Fib/Stro, fibroblast/stromal -like cells. Myofib, myofibroblast-like cells. OCR, oxygen consumption rate.
Figure 4Levels of LRP1 and assays of mitochondrial function in OM cells derived from cognitively healthy individuals and patients with AD. (a) Western blot for LRP1 protein. Quantification from two blots normalized to β-actin. Both gels/blots were processed in parallel and cropped images are shown. n = 6 for cognitively healthy females and n = 4 for female patients with AD. Statistical testing between the control and AD cells was performed with t test (unpaired, two-tailed, p = 0.0644). (b,c) Mitochondrial respiration rates were assessed in OM cells derived from controls and patients with AD with the Seahorse MitoStress test (Agilent). n = 8 for cognitively healthy individuals and n = 9 for patients with AD. (c) Statistical testing for difference in spare respiratory capacity (%) between control and AD cells was performed with t test (unpaired, two-tailed). * p < 0.05. For the OCR graph, the data are presented as mean ± SEM and for the spare respiratory capacity (%) calculation as mean ± SD. (d) Intracellular levels of the ATP were measured from the OM cell cultures with a luminescence-based assay. n = 7 for cognitively healthy individuals and n = 9 for patients with AD. Statistical testing between the control and AD cells was performed with t test (unpaired, two-tailed) *** p ≤ 0.001.