Literature DB >> 27732949

Gene expression analysis reveals the dysregulation of immune and metabolic pathways in Alzheimer's disease.

Juan Chen1, Chuncheng Xie2, Yanhong Zhao3, Zhiyan Li1, Panpan Xu1, Lifen Yao1.   

Abstract

In recent years, several pathway analyses of genome-wide association studies reported the involvement of metabolic and immune pathways in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Until now, the exact mechanisms of these pathways in AD are still unclear. Here, we conducted a pathway analysis of a whole genome AD case-control expression dataset (n=41, 25 AD cases and 16 controls) from the human temporal cortex tissue. Using the differently expressed AD genes, we identified significant KEGG pathways related to metabolism and immune processes. Using the up- and down- regulated AD gene list, we further found up-regulated AD gene were significantly enriched in immune and metabolic pathways. We further compare the immune and metabolic KEGG pathways from the expression dataset with those from previous GWAS datasets, and found that most of these pathways are shared in both GWAS and expression datasets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; Pathology Section; expression data; pathway analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27732949      PMCID: PMC5341922          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

To investigate Alzheimer's disease (AD) genetic risk factors, several genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several new AD susceptibility loci in European populations, and some of these loci were successfully replicated in other studies [1-5]. To detect more AD genetic signals, several pathway analyses of GWAS datasets have been conducted [6-11]. Lambert et al. identified significant immune KEGG pathways and GO categories in AD [6]. Jones et al. reported significant KEGG pathways and 25 GO pathways in AD [8]. Most of the 25 pathways are related to metabolism [8]. Liu et al. highlighted the cardiovascular disease-related pathways in AD [12]. The International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project (IGAP) Consortium reported 10 significant KEGG pathways [13]. Until now, the potential mechanisms of these risk pathways in AD are still unclear. We think that the different expression (up-regulation or down-regulation) of genes in these pathways may contribute to AD susceptibility. Here, we selected a whole genome AD case-control expression dataset (n = 41, 25 AD cases and 16 controls) from the human temporal cortex tissue, and conducted a pathway analysis using all the differently expressed AD genes, up-regulated AD genes, and down-regulated AD genes. We further compare the AD risk pathways from the expression dataset with those from previous GWAS datasets to address the potential mechanisms.

RESULTS

Pathway analysis of differently expressed AD genes

Using 1179 differently expressed AD genes, we identified 33 significant immune and metabolic pathways with P < 0.05 after FDR correction for multiple testing. These 33 pathways include 11 immune pathways and 22 metabolic pathways (Table 1). Oxidative phosphorylation (hsa00190) and Systemic lupus erythematosus (hsa05322) are the most significant metabolic and immune pathways with adjusted P = 1.33E-07 and P = 4.00E-04, respectively.
Table 1

significant pathways from the pathway analysis of differently expressed AD genes in expression dataset

ClassificationPathway IDPathway NameCOERrawPadjP
Immunityhsa05322Systemic lupus erythematosus136133.723.59.70E-054.00E-04
Immunityhsa05323Rheumatoid arthritis9172.492.811.25E-021.70E-02
Immunityhsa04666Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosis9492.573.51.10E-032.90E-03
Immunityhsa04062Chemokine signaling pathway189135.172.522.20E-034.80E-03
Immunityhsa04640Hematopoietic cell lineage8882.413.332.80E-035.50E-03
Immunityhsa04650Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity136103.722.694.30E-037.30E-03
Immunityhsa04670Leukocyte transendothelial migration11693.172.844.70E-037.80E-03
Immunityhsa04660T cell receptor signaling pathway10882.952.719.70E-031.41E-02
Immunityhsa04622RIG-I-like receptor signaling pathway7161.943.091.31E-021.75E-02
Immunityhsa04662B cell receptor signaling pathway7562.052.931.68E-022.22E-02
Immunityhsa04612Antigen processing and presentation7662.082.891.78E-022.29E-02
Metabolismhsa00190Oxidative phosphorylation132173.614.711.33E-072.19E-06
Metabolismhsa00360Phenylalanine metabolism1770.4615.061.72E-072.43E-06
Metabolismhsa00020Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)3070.828.541.32E-059.48E-05
Metabolismhsa00250Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism3270.8782.07E-051.00E-04
Metabolismhsa00830Retinol metabolism6491.755.145.91E-053.00E-04
Metabolismhsa00500Starch and sucrose metabolism5481.485.421.00E-044.00E-04
Metabolismhsa00350Tyrosine metabolism4171.126.251.00E-044.00E-04
Metabolismhsa00270Cysteine and methionine metabolism3660.986.14.00E-041.30E-03
Metabolismhsa00983Drug metabolism - other enzymes5271.424.925.00E-041.50E-03
Metabolismhsa00053Ascorbate and aldarate metabolism2650.717.036.00E-041.70E-03
Metabolismhsa00980Metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P4507181.944.127.00E-042.00E-03
Metabolismhsa00982Drug metabolism - cytochrome P45073824.019.00E-042.50E-03
Metabolismhsa00040Pentose and glucuronate interconversions3250.875.721.70E-033.90E-03
Metabolismhsa00140Steroid hormone biosynthesis5661.533.924.20E-037.30E-03
Metabolismhsa00620Pyruvate metabolism4051.094.574.50E-037.60E-03
Metabolismhsa00380Tryptophan metabolism4251.154.355.60E-038.90E-03
Metabolismhsa00860Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism4351.184.256.20E-039.60E-03
Metabolismhsa00514Other types of O-glycan biosynthesis4651.263.988.20E-031.23E-02
Metabolismhsa00561Glycerolipid metabolism5051.373.661.16E-021.59E-02
Metabolismhsa00562Inositol phosphate metabolism5751.563.211.96E-022.49E-02
Metabolismhsa00010Glycolysis / Gluconeogenesis6551.782.813.25E-023.83E-02
Metabolismhsa00534Glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis - heparan sulfate / heparin2650.717.036.00E-041.70E-03

C, the number of reference genes in the category; O, the number of genes in the gene set and also in the category; E, expected number in the category; R, the ratio of enrichment, rawP, the p value from hypergeometric test; adjP, the p value adjusted by the multiple test adjustment.

C, the number of reference genes in the category; O, the number of genes in the gene set and also in the category; E, expected number in the category; R, the ratio of enrichment, rawP, the p value from hypergeometric test; adjP, the p value adjusted by the multiple test adjustment.

Pathway analysis of up-regulated AD genes

Using 599 up-regulated AD genes, we identified 18 significant pathways including 6 immune and 12 metabolic pathways with P < 0.05 after FDR correction for multiple testing (Table 2). Systemic lupus erythematosus (hsa05322) and Phenylalanine metabolism (hsa00360) are the most significant immune and metabolic pathways with adjusted P = 1.44E-06 and P = 3.08E-05, respectively.
Table 2

significant pathways from the pathway analysis of up-regulated AD genes in expression dataset

ClassificationPathway IDPathway NameCOERrawPadjP
Immunityhsa05322Systemic lupus erythematosus136131.896.886.41E-081.44E-06
Immunityhsa04670Leukocyte transendothelial migration11681.614.972.00E-047.00E-04
Immunityhsa04640Hematopoietic cell lineage8861.224.911.40E-032.40E-03
Immunityhsa04650Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity13671.893.713.00E-034.10E-03
Immunityhsa04666Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosis9451.313.831.01E-021.23E-02
Immunityhsa04660T cell receptor signaling pathway10851.53.331.76E-022.03E-02
Metabolismhsa00360Phenylalanine metabolism1750.2421.182.74E-063.08E-05
Metabolismhsa00500Starch and sucrose metabolism5470.759.339.69E-067.27E-05
Metabolismhsa00053Ascorbate and aldarate metabolism2650.3613.852.63E-051.00E-04
Metabolismhsa00830Retinol metabolism6470.897.873.01E-052.00E-04
Metabolismhsa00040Pentose and glucuronate interconversions3250.4411.257.51E-053.00E-04
Metabolismhsa00860Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism4350.68.373.00E-049.00E-04
Metabolismhsa00350Tyrosine metabolism4150.578.783.00E-049.00E-04
Metabolismhsa00514Other types of O-glycan biosynthesis4650.647.834.00E-041.00E-03
Metabolismhsa00982Drug metabolism - cytochrome P4507361.015.925.00E-041.10E-03
Metabolismhsa00980Metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P4507160.996.085.00E-041.10E-03
Metabolismhsa00983Drug metabolism - other enzymes5250.726.928.00E-041.60E-03
Metabolismhsa00140Steroid hormone biosynthesis5650.786.431.10E-032.10E-03

C, O, E, R, rawP, and adjP have been defined in Table 1.

C, O, E, R, rawP, and adjP have been defined in Table 1.

Pathway analysis of down-regulated AD genes

Using 580 down-regulated AD genes, we identified 6 significant signals including 1 immune and 5 metabolic pathways with P < 0.05 after FDR correction for multiple testing (Table 3). Chemokine signaling pathway (hsa04062) is the only significant immune pathway with adjusted P = 1.90E-03. Interestingly, Oxidative phosphorylation (hsa00190), the most significant signal from the pathway analysis of all differently expressed AD genes (Table 1), is also the most significant metabolic pathway from pathway analysis of down-regulated AD genes with adjusted P = 2.99E-11 (Table 3).
Table 3

significant pathways from the pathway analysis of down-regulated AD genes in expression dataset

ClassificationPathway IDPathway NameCOERrawPadjP
Immunityhsa04062Chemokine signaling pathway18992.543.541.10E-031.90E-03
Metabolismhsa00190Oxidative phosphorylation132171.789.583.15E-122.91E-11
Metabolismhsa00020Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)3070.417.351.19E-077.47E-07
Metabolismhsa00250Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism3260.4313.943.88E-061.62E-05
Metabolismhsa00534Glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis - heparan sulfate / heparin2650.3514.32.25E-057.70E-05
Metabolismhsa00230Purine metabolism16272.183.216.60E-038.20E-05

C, O, E, R, rawP, and adjP have been defined in Table 1.

C, O, E, R, rawP, and adjP have been defined in Table 1.

Comparing the AD immune pathways using GWAS and expression data

We compared the 11 AD immune pathways with previous pathway analysis of AD GWAS. We found that 9 of the 11 pathways in Table 1 (excluding Leukocyte transendothelial migration, hsa04670 and B cell receptor signaling pathway, hsa04662) have been identified by Liu [12]. 4 of these 11 AD immune pathways including Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity (hsa04650), Antigen processing and presentation (hsa04622), RIG-I-like receptor signaling (hsa04612), and Hematopoietic cell lineage (hsa04640), have been reported [6, 8, 13].

Comparing the AD metabolic pathways using GWAS and expression data

We compared the 22 AD metabolic pathways with previous pathway analysis of AD GWAS. We found that 10 of the 22 pathways in Table 1 have been identified [12], including Oxidative phosphorylation (hsa00190), Steroid hormone biosynthesis (hsa00140), Metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450 (hsa00980), Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism (hsa00860), Drug metabolism - cytochrome P450 (hsa00982), Pentose and glucuronate interconversions (hsa00040), Pyruvate metabolism (hsa00620), Retinol metabolism (hsa00830), Glycolysis / Gluconeogenesis (hsa00010), and Starch and sucrose metabolism (hsa00500).

DISCUSSION

Recent studies reported the involvement of immune and metabolic KEGG pathways and GO categories in AD in European population [6, 8]. Evidence shows that the human genes may be differentially expressed in different ethnic populations [14]. Here, we investigated the potential mechanisms of these pathways in AD by a pathway analysis of a genome-wide expression dataset in European population [15]. In this pathway analysis, we analyzed all the differentially expressed genes, up-regulated genes and down-regulated genes [16]. It is reported that the analyzing the up- regulated genes and down-regulated genes is more powerful than analyzing all differentially expressed genes [16]. Using the differently expressed AD genes, we identified significantly enriched KEGG pathways related to metabolism and immune processes. Using the up-regulated and down-regulated AD gene list, we further found up-regulated AD genes were significantly enriched in immune and metabolic pathways. We further compare the immune and metabolic KEGG pathways from the expression dataset with those from previous GWAS datasets, and found that most of these pathways are shared in both GWAS and expression datasets. Interestingly, the clinical studies supported the involvement of immune and metabolic processes in AD, such as disrupted energy metabolism [17-20], and dysregulation of iron metabolism [21], lipid metabolism [22], phosphoinositides and phosphatidic acid in AD [22], cerebellar glucose metabolism [23], hippocampal metabolism [24], and cerebral metabolism [25]. Take the Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity (hsa04650) for example. It is shared in the GWAS and expression datasets. Natural killer cells play an important role in host defence, and are involved in AD immunopathogenesis [26]. The increased natural killer cell cytotoxicity in AD may involve protein kinase C dysregulation [27]. Take the Oxidative phosphorylation (hsa00190) for example. Oxidative phosphorylation could influence clinical status and neuroimaging intermediates in AD [28], and involve early mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative damage in AD [29]. In summary, our results show that the different expression of genes in immune and metabolic pathways may be associated with AD susceptibility. Our findings may offer new avenues for developing therapeutics for AD by regulating the expression of genes in these immune and metabolic pathways. Meanwhile, some limitations exist in our research. Here, we performed the pathway analysis of AD expression data using the KEGG database and did not selected the GO categories, considering the difference between KEGG and GO databases [6, 8]. Here, we selected only 41 samples from the human temporal cortex tissue. In future, we will select more large-scale sample size and more brain regions to evaluate our findings, and further compare these findings with those from GO database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

AD expression dataset

The expression dataset came from a whole genome AD case-control expression study (n = 41, 25 cases and 16 controls) using human temporal cortex tissue [15]. 25 AD cases and 16 controls were well-matched for age and postmortem delay [15]. We got 1196 significantly differently expressed Affymetrix transcripts with P < 0.05 after false discovery rate (FDR) correction [15].

Dataset preprocessing

In this expression dataset, the 1196 significantly differently expressed transcripts correspond to 1361 unique genes. 1179 of 1361 genes were successfully mapped to 1179 unique Entrez Gene IDs in WebGestalt database [30]. Other 182 genes were mapped to multiple Entrez Gene IDs or could not be mapped to any Entrez Gene ID. The following pathway analysis of all the differently expressed genes will be based upon the 1179 unique genes. The total of 1196 significantly differently expressed transcripts include 603 significantly up-regulated (AD cases vs. controls) and 593 significantly down-regulated (AD cases vs. controls) transcripts, which correspond to 710 and 654 unique genes (3 transcripts are both up- and down-regulated in AD cases and controls). 599 of 710 up-regulated genes were successfully mapped to 599 unique Entrez Gene IDs in WebGestalt database [30]. Other 111 genes were mapped to multiple Entrez Gene IDs or could not be mapped to any Entrez Gene ID. The following pathway analysis of up-regulated genes will be based upon the 599 unique genes. 580 of 654 up-regulated genes were successfully mapped to 580 unique Entrez Gene IDs in WebGestalt database [30]. Other 74 genes were mapped to multiple Entrez Gene IDs or could not be mapped to any Entrez Gene ID. The following pathway analysis of down-regulated genes will be based upon the 580 unique genes.

Pathway-based test

We selected the WebGestalt database for pathway analysis, and the hypergeometric test was used to identify the significant KEGG pathways [30]. We first conducted a pathway analysis using all the differently expressed AD genes, significantly up-regulated (AD cases vs. controls) and down-regulated genes (AD cases vs. controls). We selected KEGG pathways including 10-300 genes for subsequent pathway analysis [31]. The entire Entrez gene set was defined to be the reference gene list [30]. We limited potential KEGG pathways with least AD risk 5 genes and with FDR adjusted p-value below 0.05 [30].
  31 in total

Review 1.  Linking lipids to Alzheimer's disease: cholesterol and beyond.

Authors:  Gilbert Di Paolo; Tae-Wan Kim
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Cell adhesion molecule pathway genes are regulated by cis-regulatory SNPs and show significantly altered expression in Alzheimer's disease brains.

Authors:  Xinjie Bao; Gengfeng Liu; Yongshuai Jiang; Qinghua Jiang; Mingzhi Liao; Rennan Feng; Liangcai Zhang; Guoda Ma; Shuyan Zhang; Zugen Chen; Bin Zhao; Renzhi Wang; Keshen Li; Guiyou Liu
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Genome-wide pathway analysis implicates intracellular transmembrane protein transport in Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Mun-Gwan Hong; Andrey Alexeyenko; Jean-Charles Lambert; Philippe Amouyel; Jonathan A Prince
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Differential expression of oxidative phosphorylation genes in patients with Alzheimer's disease: implications for early mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative damage.

Authors:  Maria Manczak; Byung S Park; Youngsin Jung; P Hemachandra Reddy
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.843

5.  Genetic evidence implicates the immune system and cholesterol metabolism in the aetiology of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Lesley Jones; Peter A Holmans; Marian L Hamshere; Denise Harold; Valentina Moskvina; Dobril Ivanov; Andrew Pocklington; Richard Abraham; Paul Hollingworth; Rebecca Sims; Amy Gerrish; Jaspreet Singh Pahwa; Nicola Jones; Alexandra Stretton; Angharad R Morgan; Simon Lovestone; John Powell; Petroula Proitsi; Michelle K Lupton; Carol Brayne; David C Rubinsztein; Michael Gill; Brian Lawlor; Aoibhinn Lynch; Kevin Morgan; Kristelle S Brown; Peter A Passmore; David Craig; Bernadette McGuinness; Stephen Todd; Clive Holmes; David Mann; A David Smith; Seth Love; Patrick G Kehoe; Simon Mead; Nick Fox; Martin Rossor; John Collinge; Wolfgang Maier; Frank Jessen; Britta Schürmann; Reinhard Heun; Heike Kölsch; Hendrik van den Bussche; Isabella Heuser; Oliver Peters; Johannes Kornhuber; Jens Wiltfang; Martin Dichgans; Lutz Frölich; Harald Hampel; Michael Hüll; Dan Rujescu; Alison M Goate; John S K Kauwe; Carlos Cruchaga; Petra Nowotny; John C Morris; Kevin Mayo; Gill Livingston; Nicholas J Bass; Hugh Gurling; Andrew McQuillin; Rhian Gwilliam; Panos Deloukas; Ammar Al-Chalabi; Christopher E Shaw; Andrew B Singleton; Rita Guerreiro; Thomas W Mühleisen; Markus M Nöthen; Susanne Moebus; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Norman Klopp; H-Erich Wichmann; Eckhard Rüther; Minerva M Carrasquillo; V Shane Pankratz; Steven G Younkin; John Hardy; Michael C O'Donovan; Michael J Owen; Julie Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Genome wide profiling of altered gene expression in the neocortex of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Michelle G Tan; Wei-Ting Chua; Margaret M Esiri; A David Smith; Harry V Vinters; Mitchell K Lai
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 7.  The role of natural killer cells in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  F Jadidi-Niaragh; H Shegarfi; F Naddafi; A Mirshafiey
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.487

8.  Alzheimer's Disease Variants with the Genome-Wide Significance are Significantly Enriched in Immune Pathways and Active in Immune Cells.

Authors:  Qinghua Jiang; Shuilin Jin; Yongshuai Jiang; Mingzhi Liao; Rennan Feng; Liangcai Zhang; Guiyou Liu; Junwei Hao
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 5.590

9.  Metabolic links between diabetes and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Pamela A Maher; David R Schubert
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.618

10.  Common variants at MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 are associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Adam C Naj; Gyungah Jun; Gary W Beecham; Li-San Wang; Badri Narayan Vardarajan; Jacqueline Buros; Paul J Gallins; Joseph D Buxbaum; Gail P Jarvik; Paul K Crane; Eric B Larson; Thomas D Bird; Bradley F Boeve; Neill R Graff-Radford; Philip L De Jager; Denis Evans; Julie A Schneider; Minerva M Carrasquillo; Nilufer Ertekin-Taner; Steven G Younkin; Carlos Cruchaga; John S K Kauwe; Petra Nowotny; Patricia Kramer; John Hardy; Matthew J Huentelman; Amanda J Myers; Michael M Barmada; F Yesim Demirci; Clinton T Baldwin; Robert C Green; Ekaterina Rogaeva; Peter St George-Hyslop; Steven E Arnold; Robert Barber; Thomas Beach; Eileen H Bigio; James D Bowen; Adam Boxer; James R Burke; Nigel J Cairns; Chris S Carlson; Regina M Carney; Steven L Carroll; Helena C Chui; David G Clark; Jason Corneveaux; Carl W Cotman; Jeffrey L Cummings; Charles DeCarli; Steven T DeKosky; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Malcolm Dick; Dennis W Dickson; William G Ellis; Kelley M Faber; Kenneth B Fallon; Martin R Farlow; Steven Ferris; Matthew P Frosch; Douglas R Galasko; Mary Ganguli; Marla Gearing; Daniel H Geschwind; Bernardino Ghetti; John R Gilbert; Sid Gilman; Bruno Giordani; Jonathan D Glass; John H Growdon; Ronald L Hamilton; Lindy E Harrell; Elizabeth Head; Lawrence S Honig; Christine M Hulette; Bradley T Hyman; Gregory A Jicha; Lee-Way Jin; Nancy Johnson; Jason Karlawish; Anna Karydas; Jeffrey A Kaye; Ronald Kim; Edward H Koo; Neil W Kowall; James J Lah; Allan I Levey; Andrew P Lieberman; Oscar L Lopez; Wendy J Mack; Daniel C Marson; Frank Martiniuk; Deborah C Mash; Eliezer Masliah; Wayne C McCormick; Susan M McCurry; Andrew N McDavid; Ann C McKee; Marsel Mesulam; Bruce L Miller; Carol A Miller; Joshua W Miller; Joseph E Parisi; Daniel P Perl; Elaine Peskind; Ronald C Petersen; Wayne W Poon; Joseph F Quinn; Ruchita A Rajbhandary; Murray Raskind; Barry Reisberg; John M Ringman; Erik D Roberson; Roger N Rosenberg; Mary Sano; Lon S Schneider; William Seeley; Michael L Shelanski; Michael A Slifer; Charles D Smith; Joshua A Sonnen; Salvatore Spina; Robert A Stern; Rudolph E Tanzi; John Q Trojanowski; Juan C Troncoso; Vivianna M Van Deerlin; Harry V Vinters; Jean Paul Vonsattel; Sandra Weintraub; Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer; Jennifer Williamson; Randall L Woltjer; Laura B Cantwell; Beth A Dombroski; Duane Beekly; Kathryn L Lunetta; Eden R Martin; M Ilyas Kamboh; Andrew J Saykin; Eric M Reiman; David A Bennett; John C Morris; Thomas J Montine; Alison M Goate; Deborah Blacker; Debby W Tsuang; Hakon Hakonarson; Walter A Kukull; Tatiana M Foroud; Jonathan L Haines; Richard Mayeux; Margaret A Pericak-Vance; Lindsay A Farrer; Gerard D Schellenberg
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  10 in total

1.  Metapone: a Bioconductor package for joint pathway testing for untargeted metabolomics data.

Authors:  Leqi Tian; Zhenjiang Li; Guoxuan Ma; Xiaoyue Zhang; Ziyin Tang; Siheng Wang; Jian Kang; Donghai Liang; Tianwei Yu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.931

2.  Adherence to MIND Diet, Genetic Susceptibility, and Incident Dementia in Three US Cohorts.

Authors:  Thanh Huyen T Vu; Todd Beck; David A Bennett; Julie A Schneider; Kathleen M Hayden; Aladdin H Shadyab; Kumar B Rajan; Martha Clare Morris; Marilyn C Cornelis
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 6.706

3.  Single-Cell RNA-Seq Analysis of Olfactory Mucosal Cells of Alzheimer's Disease Patients.

Authors:  Riikka Lampinen; Mohammad Feroze Fazaludeen; Simone Avesani; Tiit Örd; Elina Penttilä; Juha-Matti Lehtola; Toni Saari; Sanna Hannonen; Liudmila Saveleva; Emma Kaartinen; Francisco Fernández Acosta; Marcela Cruz-Haces; Heikki Löppönen; Alan Mackay-Sim; Minna U Kaikkonen; Anne M Koivisto; Tarja Malm; Anthony R White; Rosalba Giugno; Sweelin Chew; Katja M Kanninen
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  A Meta-Analysis of Alzheimer's Disease Brain Transcriptomic Data.

Authors:  Hamel Patel; Richard J B Dobson; Stephen J Newhouse
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.472

5.  CSF metabolites associate with CSF tau and improve prediction of Alzheimer's disease status.

Authors:  Ruocheng Dong; Burcu F Darst; Yuetiva Deming; Yue Ma; Qiongshi Lu; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Cynthia M Carlsson; Sterling C Johnson; Sanjay Asthana; Corinne D Engelman
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2021-05-01

6.  Chordin-like 1 is a novel prognostic biomarker and correlative with immune cell infiltration in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Bing Deng; Xiaorui Chen; Lingfang Xu; Li Zheng; Xiaoqian Zhu; Junwei Shi; Lei Yang; Dian Wang; Depeng Jiang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 5.682

7.  Temporal Cortex Microarray Analysis Revealed Impaired Ribosomal Biogenesis and Hyperactivity of the Glutamatergic System: An Early Signature of Asymptomatic Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Ankita Kumari; Abdul Rahaman; Xin-An Zeng; Muhammad Adil Farooq; Yanyan Huang; Runyu Yao; Murtaza Ali; Romana Ishrat; Rafat Ali
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  Shared Biological Pathways Between Alzheimer's Disease and Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Pan Cui; Xiaofeng Ma; He Li; Wenjing Lang; Junwei Hao
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Interaction between MyD88, TIRAP and IL1RL1 against Helicobacter pylori infection.

Authors:  Andrea Fulgione; Marina Papaianni; Paola Cuomo; Debora Paris; Marco Romano; Concetta Tuccillo; Letizia Palomba; Chiara Medaglia; Massimiliano De Seta; Nicolino Esposito; Andrea Motta; Antonio Iannelli; Domenico Iannelli; Rosanna Capparelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Blood biomarkers indicate that the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease present overlapping molecular features.

Authors:  Alfonso Di Costanzo; Debora Paris; Dominique Melck; Antonella Angiolillo; Gaetano Corso; Mauro Maniscalco; Andrea Motta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.