Literature DB >> 11324869

Recognizing identical versus similar categorically related common objects: further evidence for degraded gist representations in amnesia.

W Koutstaal1, M Verfaellie, D L Schacter.   

Abstract

Studies have shown lower false recognition of semantically related lure words in patients with global amnesia than in matched controls. This pattern has been interpreted as suggesting that medial temporal and diencephalic structures that are damaged in amnesia and that contribute to veridical memory also contribute to false recognition. It has been argued that whereas controls form and retain a well-organized representation of the semantic gist of studied items, patients with amnesia can retain only a degraded gist representation. However, these studies are subject to an alternative interpretation involving greater source confusions in controls. The authors used a categorized-pictures paradigm to test recognition under conditions in which source confusions were unlikely to occur. Relative to controls, patients with amnesia showed reduced false recognition of categorically related pictorial lures, thereby supporting the notion of degraded gist representations in amnesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11324869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychology        ISSN: 0894-4105            Impact factor:   3.295


  10 in total

1.  Pattern separation deficits following damage to the hippocampus.

Authors:  C Brock Kirwan; Andrew Hartshorn; Shauna M Stark; Naomi J Goodrich-Hunsaker; Ramona O Hopkins; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  False recognition of incidentally learned pictures and words in primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Emily Rogalski; Diana Blum; Alfred Rademaker; Sandra Weintraub
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Intact emotion-induced recognition bias in neuropsychological patients with executive control deficits.

Authors:  Sabine Windmann; Till Schneider; Julia Reczio; Martin Grobosch; Volker Voelzke; Valerie Blasius; Andrea Brämer; Werner Ischebeck; Grazyna Janikowski; Winfried Mandrella; Claudia Unger; Larissa Wischnjak
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Decreased parahippocampal activity in associative priming: evidence from an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  Jiongjiong Yang; Axel Meckingler; Mingwei Xu; Yanbing Zhao; Xuchu Weng
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  False recognition of objects in visual scenes: findings from a combined direct and indirect memory test.

Authors:  Yana Weinstein; Robert A Nash
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-01

6.  An adaptive perspective on visual working memory distortions.

Authors:  Chaipat Chunharas; Rosanne L Rademaker; Timothy F Brady; John T Serences
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2022-02-21

7.  Preserved metamemorial ability in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease: shifting response bias.

Authors:  Jill D Waring; Hyemi Chong; David A Wolk; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Tracking the emergence of memories: A category-learning paradigm to explore schema-driven recognition.

Authors:  Felipe De Brigard; Timothy F Brady; Luka Ruzic; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-01

9.  False Memories: The Other Side of Forgetting.

Authors:  Katherine W Turk; Rocco Palumbo; Rebecca G Deason; Anna Marin; Ala'a Elshaar; Emma Gosselin; Maureen K O'Connor; Yorghos Tripodis; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 2.892

Review 10.  Constructive memory: past and future.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.986

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.