Literature DB >> 33934018

Sourcing data on chemical properties and hazard data from the US-EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard: A practical guide for human risk assessment.

Antony J Williams1, Jason C Lambert2, Kris Thayer3, Jean-Lou C M Dorne4.   

Abstract

For the past six decades, human health risk assessment of chemicals has relied on in vivo data from human epidemiological and experimental animal toxicological studies to inform the derivation of non-cancer toxicity values. The ongoing evolution of this risk assessment paradigm in an environmental landscape of data-poor chemicals has highlighted the need to develop and implement non-testing methods, so-called New Approach Methodologies (NAMs). NAMs include a growing number of in silico and in vitro data streams designed to inform hazard properties of chemicals, including kinetics and dynamics at different levels of biological organization, environmental fate and transport, and exposure. NAMs provide a fit-for-purpose science-basis for human hazard and risk characterization of chemicals ranging from data-gap filling applications to broad evidence-based decision-making. Systematic assembly and delivery of empirical and predicted data for chemicals are paramount to advancing chemical evaluation, and software tools serve an essential role in delivering these data to the scientific community. The CompTox Chemicals Dashboard (from here on referred to as the "Dashboard") is one such tool and is a publicly available web-based application developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency to provide access to chemistry, toxicity and exposure information for ~900,000 chemicals. The Dashboard is increasingly becoming a valuable resource for assessors tasked with the evaluation of potential human health risks associated with chemical exposures. In this context, the significant amount of information present in the Dashboard facilitates: 1) assembly of information on physicochemical properties and environmental fate and transport and exposure parameters and metrics; 2) identification of cancer and non-cancer health effects from extant human and experimental animal studies in the public domain and/or information not available in the public domain (i.e., "grey literature"); 3) systematic literature searching and review for developing cancer and non-cancer hazard evidence bases; and 4) access to mechanistic information that can aid or augment the analysis of traditional toxicology evidence bases, or potentially, serve as the primary basis for informing hazard identification and dose-response when traditional bioassay data are lacking. Finally, in silico predictive tools developed to conduct structure-activity or read-across analyses are also available within the Dashboard. This practical tutorial is intended to address key questions from the human health risk assessment community dealing with chemicals in both food and in the environment. Perspectives for future development or refinement of the Dashboard highlight foreseen activities to further support the research and risk assessment community in cancer and non-cancer chemical evaluations. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational toxicology; Human health; Risk assessment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33934018     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  6 in total

1.  In Silico Methods for Environmental Risk Assessment: Principles, Tiered Approaches, Applications, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Astuto; Matteo R Di Nicola; José V Tarazona; A Rortais; Yann Devos; A K Djien Liem; George E N Kass; Maria Bastaki; Reinhilde Schoonjans; Angelo Maggiore; Sandrine Charles; Aude Ratier; Christelle Lopes; Ophelia Gestin; Tobin Robinson; Antony Williams; Nynke Kramer; Edoardo Carnesecchi; Jean-Lou C M Dorne
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies.

Authors:  Antonio F Hernandez-Jerez; Paulien Adriaanse; Annette Aldrich; Philippe Berny; Tamara Coja; Sabine Duquesne; Andreas Focks; Marina Marinovich; Maurice Millet; Olavi Pelkonen; Silvia Pieper; Aaldrik Tiktak; Christopher J Topping; Anneli Widenfalk; Martin Wilks; Gerrit Wolterink; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Jochem Louisse; Serge Rudaz; Emanuela Testai; Alfonso Lostia; Jean-Lou Dorne; Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-12-23

3.  One planet: one health. A call to support the initiative on a global science-policy body on chemicals and waste.

Authors:  Werner Brack; Damia Barcelo Culleres; Alistair B A Boxall; Hélène Budzinski; Sara Castiglioni; Adrian Covaci; Valeria Dulio; Beate I Escher; Peter Fantke; Faith Kandie; Despo Fatta-Kassinos; Félix J Hernández; Klara Hilscherová; Juliane Hollender; Henner Hollert; Annika Jahnke; Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern; Stuart J Khan; Andreas Kortenkamp; Klaus Kümmerer; Brice Lalonde; Marja H Lamoree; Yves Levi; Pablo Antonio Lara Martín; Cassiana C Montagner; Christian Mougin; Titus Msagati; Jörg Oehlmann; Leo Posthuma; Malcolm Reid; Martin Reinhard; Susan D Richardson; Pawel Rostkowski; Emma Schymanski; Flurina Schneider; Jaroslav Slobodnik; Yasuyuki Shibata; Shane Allen Snyder; Fernando Fabriz Sodré; Ivana Teodorovic; Kevin V Thomas; Gisela A Umbuzeiro; Pham Hung Viet; Karina Gin Yew-Hoong; Xiaowei Zhang; Ettore Zuccato
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.893

4.  Mapping DEHP to the adverse outcome pathway network for human female reproductive toxicity.

Authors:  Kristina Pogrmic-Majkic; Dragana Samardzija Nenadov; Biljana Tesic; Svetlana Fa Nedeljkovic; Dunja Kokai; Bojana Stanic; Nebojsa Andric
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 6.168

5.  Comparison of State-Level Regulations for Cannabis Contaminants and Implications for Public Health.

Authors:  Laura E Jameson; Kendra D Conrow; Dorina V Pinkhasova; Haleigh L Boulanger; Hyunji Ha; Negar Jourabchian; Steven A Johnson; Michael P Simeone; Iniobong A Afia; Thomas M Cahill; Cindy S Orser; Maxwell C K Leung
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 11.035

6.  A Computational Understanding of Inter-Individual Variability in CYP2D6 Activity to Investigate the Impact of Missense Mutations on Ochratoxin A Metabolism.

Authors:  Jean Lou C M Dorne; Martina Cirlini; Jochem Louisse; Lorenzo Pedroni; Gianni Galaverna; Luca Dellafiora
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.