Literature DB >> 3536994

Effect of blind passage and multiple sampling on recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from urogenital specimens.

R B Jones, B P Katz, B van der Pol, V A Caine, B E Batteiger, W J Newhall.   

Abstract

Detection of chlamydial infections depends on the sensitivity of the techniques used. Variables include the number of body sites sampled, the number of samples obtained, and the number of passages in tissue culture. To assess these factors, microdilution plate cultures with a single blind passage were performed on specimens from 10,291 men and women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. Overall, 21% of the men and 30% of the women were culture positive. However, 18% of endocervical, 28% of female urethral, and 29% of male urethral cultures that were positive became so only after a single passage. Of culture-positive women, 23% were positive at the urethra only. Pooled urethral and endocervical specimens were positive more often than an endocervical specimen alone but less often than separately cultured endocervical and urethral specimens. A total of 221 specimens from 92 men and 66 women were subjected to five serial blind passages. Of 83 positive specimens, 29 (35%) were positive only after two or more passages. A total of 37 (46%) women were culture-positive, but only 12 (33%) of those who were positive and had an endocervical culture would have been detected by a single endocervical culture that was not passaged. The sensitivity of chlamydial culture is substantially less than 100% but can be improved by culturing samples from both the urethra and endocervix in women and by serial passage in tissue culture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3536994      PMCID: PMC269092          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.24.6.1029-1033.1986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  20 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of sexually transmitted Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  S E Thompson; A E Washington
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.

Authors:  G Johannisson; G B Löwhagen; E Lycke
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Sampling, specimen handling, and isolation techniques in the diagnosis of Chlamydial and other genital infections.

Authors:  P A Mårdh; L Weström; S Colleen; P Wølner-Hanssen
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1981 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Persistent infection of mouse fibroblasts (McCoy cells) with a trachoma strain of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  C K Lee; J W Moulder
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Sensitivity of immunofluorescence with monoclonal antibodies for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in cell culture.

Authors:  R S Stephens; C C Kuo; M R Tam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Chlamydia trachomatis-induced urethritis in female partners of men with nongonococcal urethritis.

Authors:  J Paavonen
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1979 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in Mccoy cell cultures with fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  W E Stamm; M Tam; M Koester; L Cles
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Urethritis in women attending an STD clinic.

Authors:  J E Wallin; S E Thompson; A Zaidi; K H Wong
Journal:  Br J Vener Dis       Date:  1981-02

9.  Recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from the endometrium of women at risk for chlamydial infection.

Authors:  R B Jones; J B Mammel; M K Shepard; R R Fisher
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Persistent infection of mouse fibroblasts (L cells) with Chlamydia psittaci: evidence for a cryptic chlamydial form.

Authors:  J W Moulder; N J Levy; L P Schulman
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  25 in total

1.  Comparison of two culture approaches, blind passage and dual observation, for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in various prevalence populations.

Authors:  S J Zimmerman; E Moses; N Sofat; W R Bartholomew; D Amsterdam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Accuracy of two enzyme immunoassays and cell culture in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in low and high risk populations in Senegal.

Authors:  E Van Dyck; N Samb; A D Sarr; L Van de Velden; J Moran; S Mboup; I Ndoye; J L Lamboray; A Meheus; P Piot
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Comparison of buffalo green monkey cells and McCoy cells for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis in a microtiter system.

Authors:  T Krech; M Bleckmann; R Paatz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

5.  Comparison of the ligase chain reaction with cell culture for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.

Authors:  G L Ridgway; G Mumtaz; A J Robinson; M Franchini; C Carder; J Burczak; H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Evaluation of the microparticle enzyme immunoassay Abbott IMx Select Chlamydia and the importance of urethral site sampling to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in women.

Authors:  M K Brokenshire; P J Say; A H van Vonno; C Wong
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-12

Review 7.  Susceptibility testing of Chlamydia trachomatis: from eggs to monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  J M Ehret; F N Judson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in men with urethritis: serology v isolation in cell culture.

Authors:  Z J Hagay; B Sarov; J Sachs; O Shaked; I Sarov
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1989-06

9.  Quantitative culture of endocervical Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  R C Barnes; B P Katz; R T Rolfs; B Batteiger; V Caine; R B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Use of multiple nucleic acid amplification tests to define the infected-patient "gold standard" in clinical trials of new diagnostic tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  David H Martin; Malanda Nsuami; Julius Schachter; Edward W Hook; Dennis Ferrero; Thomas C Quinn; Charlotte Gaydos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.