| Literature DB >> 35164341 |
Vishal S Patil1, Darasaguppe R Harish1, Umashankar Vetrivel1,2, Subarna Roy1, Sanjay H Deshpande1,3, Harsha V Hegde1.
Abstract
Terminalia chebula Retz. forms a key component of traditional folk medicine and is also reported to possess antihepatitis C virus (HCV) and immunomodulatory activities. However, information on the intermolecular interactions of phytochemicals from this plant with HCV and human proteins are yet to be established. Thus, by this current study, we investigated the HCV NS3/4A inhibitory and host immune-modulatory activity of phytocompounds from T. chebula through in silico strategies involving network pharmacology and structural bioinformatics techniques. To start with, the phytochemical dataset of T. chebula was curated from biological databases and the published literature. Further, the target ability of the phytocompounds was predicted using BindingDB for both HCV NS3/4A and other probable host targets involved in the immune system. Further, the identified targets were docked to the phytochemical dataset using AutoDock Vina executed through the POAP pipeline. The resultant docked complexes with significant binding energy were subjected to 50 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation in order to infer the stability of complex formation. During network pharmacology analysis, the gene set pathway enrichment of host targets was performed using the STRING and Reactome pathway databases. Further, the biological network among compounds, proteins, and pathways was constructed using Cytoscape 3.6.1. Furthermore, the druglikeness, side effects, and toxicity of the phytocompounds were also predicted using the MolSoft, ADVERpred, and PreADMET methods, respectively. Out of 41 selected compounds, 10 were predicted to target HCV NS3/4A and also to possess druglike and nontoxic properties. Among these 10 molecules, Chebulagic acid and 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose exhibited potent HCV NS3/4A inhibitory activity, as these scored a lowest binding energy (BE) of -8.6 kcal/mol and -7.7 kcal/mol with 11 and 20 intermolecular interactions with active site residues, respectively. These findings are highly comparable with Asunaprevir (known inhibitor of HCV NS3/4A), which scored a BE of -7.4 kcal/mol with 20 key intermolecular interactions. MD studies also strongly suggest that chebulagic acid and 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose as promising leads, as these molecules showed stable binding during 50 ns of production run. Further, the gene set enrichment and network analysis of 18 protein targets prioritized 10 compounds and were predicted to potentially modulate the host immune system, hemostasis, cytokine levels, interleukins signaling pathways, and platelet aggregation. On overall analysis, this present study predicts that tannins from T. chebula have a potential HCV NS3/4A inhibitory and host immune-modulatory activity. However, further experimental studies are required to confirm the efficacies.Entities:
Keywords: 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose; Terminalia chebula Retz; chebulagic acid; docking; dynamics; hepatitis C virus NS3/4A; network pharmacology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35164341 PMCID: PMC8839135 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27031076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1HCV, NS3 X-ray crystallographic structure, substrate binding pockets, and its catalytic triad residues.
Figure 2Workflow followed in the current study.
List of phytocompounds from T. chebula predicted to inhibit HCV NS3/4A.
| Phytocompounds | PubChem ID | Structural Similarity ( | Experimental Assay | Reference Compound PubChem CID | Experimental IC50 of Reference Compound (µM) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose | 374874 | 1 | Inhibitory activity against HCV NS3 protease by ELISA | 15945060 | 0.75 | [ |
| 1,3,4,6-Tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose | 471531 | 0.98 | ||||
| 1,3,6-Tri-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose | 452707 | 0.98 | ||||
| 1,6,-di-O-galloyl-D-glucose | 91227631 | 0.94 | ||||
| 2,3,4,6 tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose | 101011018 | 0.7 | ||||
| 3,4,6-tri-O-galloyl-D-glucose | 14188641 | 0.87 | ||||
| Chebulagic acid | 250397 | 0.7 | HCV NS3 protease binding assay | 511658 | 0.3 | [ |
| 511659 | 0.8 | [ | ||||
| Corilagin | 73568 | 0.74 | HCV NS3 protease binding assay | 511658 | 0.3 | [ |
| 511659 | 0.8 | [ | ||||
| Inhibitory activity against HCV NS3 protease by ELISA | 15945060 | 0.75 | [ | |||
| Tellimagrandin I | 442690 | 0.7 | HCV NS3 protease binding assay | 511658 | 0.3 | [ |
| 511659 | 0.8 | [ | ||||
| Inhibitory activity against HCV NS3 protease by ELISA | 15945060 | 0.75 | [ | |||
| Tercatain | 14411426 | 0.75 | HCV NS3 protease binding assay | 511658 | 0.3 | [ |
| 511659 | 0.8 | [ | ||||
| Inhibitory activity against HCV NS3 protease by ELISA | 15945060 | 0.75 | [ |
Pathways modulated by the phytocompounds.
| Reactome ID | Pathways | Gene Count | Background Gene Count | FDR | Genes within Pathway |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSA-109582 | Hemostasis | 8 | 601 | 1.52E-05 | F10, F11, F2, LCK, PLAT, PLAU, PTPN1, SERPINE1 |
| HSA-140837 | Intrinsic pathway of fibrin clot formation | 3 | 22 | 0.00014 | F10, F11, F2 |
| HSA-140877 | Formation of fibrin clot (clotting cascade) | 3 | 39 | 0.00051 | F10, F11, F2 |
| HSA-162582 | Signal transduction | 11 | 2605 | 0.00051 | F2, HSP90AA1, LCK, PDK1, PLAT, PTPN1, PTPN2, RGS4, RGS7, RGS8, SERPINE1 |
| HSA-9006934 | Signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases | 5 | 437 | 0.0019 | HSP90AA1, LCK, PLAT, PTPN1, PTPN2 |
| HSA-76002 | Platelet activation, signaling, and aggregation | 4 | 256 | 0.0023 | F2, LCK, PTPN1, SERPINE1 |
| HSA-6807004 | Negative regulation of MET activity | 2 | 20 | 0.0038 | PTPN1, PTPN2 |
| HSA-140875 | Common pathway of fibrin clot formation | 2 | 22 | 0.0042 | F10, F2 |
| HSA-1280215 | Cytokine signaling in immune system | 5 | 654 | 0.0062 | GSTO1, HSP90AA1, LCK, PTPN1, PTPN2 |
| HSA-76009 | Platelet aggregation (plug formation) | 2 | 37 | 0.0096 | F2, PTPN1 |
| HSA-449147 | Signaling by interleukins | 4 | 439 | 0.0111 | GSTO1, HSP90AA1, LCK, PTPN2 |
| HSA-168256 | Immune system | 7 | 1925 | 0.0245 | F2, GSTO1, HSP90AA1, LCK, PLAU, PTPN1, PTPN2 |
FDR, False discovery rate.
Figure 3Network representation of phytocompound-target-pathway.
Figure 4Characteristics of PDB ID: 4WF8 (HCV NS3/4A crystal structure). (a) Ramachandran plot by PROCHECK. (b) Overall quality prediction by ERRAT. * On the error axis, two lines are drawn to indicate the confidence with which it is possible to reject regions that exceed that error value. ** Expressed as the percentage of the protein for which the calculated error value falls below the 95% rejection limit.
Figure 5Stability of HCV NS3/4A (PDB ID: 4WF8). (a) Backbone RMSD and (b) per-residue backbone RMSF.
Binding affinity of prioritized phytocompounds with HCV NS3/4A.
| Phytocompounds | PubChem CID | BE (kcal/mol) | Total No. of Interactions | No. of Interactions with Active Site Residues | HBI (Amino Acid…Ligand) | Van der Waals, Pi–Alkyl, CH, Pi–Cation, Pi–Sigma, Pi–Pi Stacked, Pi–Pi T-Shaped Interactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose | 374874 | −7.7 | 20 | 20 | Gln1041…OH, His1057…OH (2), Asp1081…OH, Ile1132…OH, Ser1139…O-, Ser1139…OH (2), Arg1155…O- (2) | Val1055, His1057 (2), Gly1058, Ile1132, Lys1136, Ala1156 (3), Ala1157 |
| 1,3,4,6-Tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose | 471531 | −7.6 | 14 | 14 | Gln1041…OH, Asp1081…OH, Ile1132…OH, Ser1139…OH (2), Ser1139…O- (2), Arg1155…OH | Ile1132, Lys1136 (2), Gly1137, Ala1156, Ala1157 |
| 1,3,6-Tri-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose | 452707 | −7.0 | 8 | 8 | Gly1058…O-, Gly1137…O-, Ser1139….O- (2), Ser1139…OH | His1057, Lys1136, Ala1156 |
| 1,6,-di-O-galloyl-D-glucose | 91227631 | −6.6 | 6 | 5 | Thr1042…OH, Ile1132…OH, Ser1139…O- | His1057 (2), Lys1136 |
| 2,3,4,6 tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose | 101011018 | −6.5 | 11 | 11 | Gln1041…OH, Ser1139…OH (3) | Ile1132, Lys1136, Gly1137, Ser1139, Ala1156 (2), Ala1157 |
| 3,4,6-tri-O-galloyl-D-glucose | 14188641 | −6.6 | 11 | 10 | Gln1041…OH, Thr1042…OH, Ile1132…OH, Ser1139…OH, Ser1139…O- | His1057, Ile1132, Lys1136, Gly1137, Ala1156, Ala1157 |
| Chebulagic acid | 250397 | −8.4 | 13 | 11 | Gly1137…O-, Arg1155…=O, Arg1155…=O, Gly1058…O-, Ile1132…OH (2), Ser1159…OH (2) | Lys1136 (2), His1057, Ile1132, Ser1139 |
| Corilagin | 73568 | −7.3 | 3 | 3 | Gln1041…OH, His1057…O- | Lys1136 |
| Tellimagrandin I | 442690 | −7.7 | 10 | 9 | Gln1041…OH, Thr1042…OH, Gly1058…O-, Ser1139…=O, Ala1157…O- | His1057, Ile1132 (2), Lys1136, Ala1157 |
| Tercatain | 14411426 | −7.5 | 8 | 6 | Leu1135…OH, Ser1139…O-, Ser1159…OH, Ser1159…O- | His1057 (2), Lys1136, Ala1156 |
| * Asunaprevir | 16076883 | −7.4 | 20 | 20 | Gly1137…=O (2), Ala1157…NH, Ala1157…=O | Arg1155 (2), Asp1081 (2), His1057 (2), Ala1156 (4), Ile1132 (3), Val1158 (2), Lys1136 (2) |
* Standard molecule (HCV NS3/4A inhibitor); BE, binding energy; HBI, hydrogen bond interactions; NHBI, non-hydrogen bond interactions. The interaction of compounds with catalytic triad residues was highlighted.
Figure 6Intermolecular Interactions of Asunaprevir with NS3/4A. (a) Asunaprevir at catalytic triad residue site; (b) Asunaprevir at NS3/4A binding pocket; (c) Asunaprevir interaction with catalytic triad residue Ser1139.
Figure 7Intermolecular interactions of chebulagic acid with NS3/4A. (a) Chebulagic acid at catalytic triad residue site; (b) chebulagic acid bound to NS3/4A binding pocket; (c) chebulagic acid interactions with catalytic triad residue Ser1139, His1057, and Asp1081.
Figure 8Intermolecular Interactions of 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose with NS3/4A. (a) 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose at catalytic triad residue site; (b) 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose bound to NS3/4A binding pocket; (c) 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose interactions with catalytic triad residue Ser1139, His1057, and Asp1081.
Interactions of compounds with HCV NS3/4A after 50ns MD simulation.
| Compound/Ligand Name | Amino Acid Residue | Ligand Atom | Ligand Atom Position | Ligand Atom Interactions with the Protein Residues (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asunaprevir | Gly1137 | =O | 16 | 97 |
| Ala1157 | =O | 7 | 99 | |
| Ala1157 | NH | 44 | 82 | |
| Ser1139 | =O | 9 | 56 | |
| Ser1159 | -O | 47 | 46 | |
| Gln1041 | +O | 18 | 39 | |
| Thr1042 | -O | 18 | 38 | |
| Thr1042 | -O | 18 | 28 | |
| Chebulagic acid | Ala1157 | =O | 41 | 61 |
| Asp1081 | OH | 68 | 51 | |
| Asp1081 | =O | 67 | 38 | |
| Asp1168 | =O | 20 | 31 | |
| Ile1132 | OH | 46 | 45 | |
| Arg1155 | OH | 50 | 31 | |
| His1057 | π-π | 25–30 | 46 | |
| 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose | Asp1081 | OH | 41 | 99 |
| Asp1081 | OH | 40 | 99 | |
| Arg1155 | OH | 42 | 37 | |
| Arg1155 | OH | 42 | 22 | |
| Gly1137 | OH | 65 | 41 | |
| Ser1139 | OH | 65 | 61 | |
| Ser1139 | OH | 66 | 72 | |
| Leu1135 | OH | 67 | 47 | |
| Leu1157 | OH | 67 | 32 | |
| Tyr1056 | OH | 18 | 23 | |
| His1057 | OH | 18 | 23 |
Figure 9MD trajectories of Asunaprevir in complex with HCV NS3/4A for a 50 ns simulation: (a) RMSD, (b) RMSF, (c) rGyr, and (d–f) residue-wise ligand–protein contacts.
Figure 10Stability of chebulagic acid with HCV NS3/4A at 50 ns of simulation: (a) RMSD, (b) RMSF, (c) rGyr, and (d–f) residue-wise ligand–protein contacts.
Figure 11Stability of 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose with HCV NS3/4A at 50 ns of simulation: (a) RMSD, (b) RMSF, (c) rGyr, and (d–f) residue-wise ligand–protein contacts.
Druglikeness characteristics of phytocompounds.
| Phytocompounds | MW (g/mol) | MF | HBA | HBD | LogP | DLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,2,3,4,6-Pentagalloyl glucose | 940.12 | C41 H32 O26 | 26 | 15 | 1.47 | 0.19 |
| 1,3,4,6-Tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose | 788.11 | C34 H28 O22 | 22 | 13 | 0.62 | 0.92 |
| 1,3,6-Tri-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose | 636.1 | C27 H24 O18 | 18 | 11 | −0.08 | 0.92 |
| 1,6,-di-O-galloyl-D-glucose | 484.09 | C20 H20 O14 | 14 | 9 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| 2,3,4,6 tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose | 788.11 | C34 H28 O22 | 22 | 13 | 0.1 | 0.44 |
| 3,4,6-tri-O-galloyl-D-glucose | 636.1 | C27 H24 O18 | 18 | 11 | −0.2 | 0.87 |
| Chebulagic acid | 954.1 | C41 H30 O27 | 27 | 13 | 0.22 | 0.58 |
| Corilagin | 634.08 | C27 H22 O18 | 18 | 11 | 0.51 | 0.64 |
| Tellimagrandin I | 786.09 | C34 H26 O22 | 22 | 13 | 1.15 | 0.3 |
| Tercatain | 786.09 | C34 H26 O22 | 22 | 13 | 1.21 | 0.65 |
MW, molecular weight; MF, molecular formula; HBA, hydrogen bond acceptors; HBD, hydrogen bond donor; DLS, druglikeness score.
Figure 12Heat map representation of phytocompounds with their probable (a) side effects and (b) toxicity.