| Literature DB >> 21982053 |
Kun Li1, Yunpeng Diao, Houli Zhang, Shouyu Wang, Zhen Zhang, Bo Yu, Shanshan Huang, Hong Yang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tannins extracted from immature fruits of Terminalia chebula Fructus Retz. are considered as effective components promoting the process of wound healing. The objective of this study is to explore the optimal extraction and purification technology (OEPT) of tannins, while studying the use of this drug in the treatment of a cutaneous wound of rat as well as its antibacterial effects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21982053 PMCID: PMC3198757 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-86
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
The orthogonal test of four factors at three different levels
| Factors | A duration of extraction (hour) | B maceration time(min) | C extract-solvent ratio(times) | D number of extraction(times) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 20 | 10 | 1 |
| 2 | 1.5 | 40 | 15 | 2 |
| 3 | 2 | 60 | 20 | 3 |
Score of historical evaluation
| Score | Re-epithelialization | Granulation tissue formation | Collagen organization |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | None | None | None |
| 1 | Migrating | Hypo cellular with few vessels | Trace |
| 2 | Partial stratum corneum | Many vessels and some cells | Slight |
| 3 | Hypertrohic | Many fibroblasts, some fibers | Moderate |
| 4 | Complete and normal | More fibers, few cells | Marked |
The result of orthogonal test
| No | A | B | C | D | extract weight(%)y1 | TTC(%)y2 | score z |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 56.76 | 22.54 | 73.79 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 69.10 | 24.97 | 85.14 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 73.18 | 30.92 | 98.65 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 72.14 | 31.63 | 99.44 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 34.94 | 26.04 | 68.46 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 64.81 | 24.73 | 82.34 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 62.08 | 30.09 | 91.09 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 65.58 | 28.54 | 89.99 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 52.24 | 24.25 | 74.56 |
| K1 | 257.58 | 264.32 | 246.12 | 216.81 | |||
| K2 | 250.24 | 243.59 | 259.14 | 258.57 | |||
| K3 | 255.64 | 255.55 | 258.20 | 288.08 | |||
| k1 | 85.86 | 88.11 | 82.04 | 72.27 | |||
| k2 | 83.41 | 81.20 | 86.38 | 86.19 | |||
| k3 | 85.21 | 85.18 | 86.07 | 96.03 | |||
| R | 2.45 | 6.91 | 4,34 | 23.76 |
Z = (y1/y1max) × 40 + (y2/y2max) × 60
Figure 1The calibration curve of gallic acid. linear range (1~10 μg/ml), Regression equation(Y = aX + b): y = 52.496x + 0.0163, R2 = 0.9993(n = 6)
Figure 2Morphology of . A the normal morphology of Staphylococcus aureus; B the morphology of Staphylococcus aureus on 24 h; C the normal morphology of Klebsiella Pneumonia; D the morphology of Klebsiella Pneumonia on 24 h
Figure 3Histological compare in the character of wound healing on day 3. (100 × magnification). A: groupⅠ; B: groupⅡ; C: groupⅢ
Figure 4Immunohistochemical examination of VEGFA expression on day 3. (400 × magnification). A: groupⅠ; B: groupⅡ; C: group Ⅲ
Figure 5VEGFA mRNA expression on day 3. (*P < 0.05 as compared with groupⅠ)