| Literature DB >> 35163557 |
Pangzhen Zhang1, Nathaniel Quan En Chua2, Simon Dang2, Ashleigh Davis2, Kah Wee Chong2, Stephen S Prime3, Nicola Cirillo2.
Abstract
Betel quid (BQ) is a package of mixed constituents that is chewed by more than 600 million people worldwide, particularly in Asia. The formulation of BQ depends on a variety of factors but typically includes areca nut, betel leaf, and slaked lime and may or may not contain tobacco. BQ chewing is strongly associated with the development of potentially malignant and malignant diseases of the mouth such as oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), respectively. We have shown recently that the constituents of BQ vary geographically and that the capacity to induce disease reflects the distinct chemical composition of the BQ. In this review, we examined the diverse chemical constituents of BQ and their putative role in oral carcinogenesis. Four major areca alkaloids-arecoline, arecaidine, guvacoline and guvacine-together with the polyphenols, were identified as being potentially involved in oral carcinogenesis. Further, we propose that fibroblast senescence, which is induced by certain BQ components, may be a key driver of tumour progression in OSMF and OSCC. Our study emphasizes that the characterization of the detrimental or protective effects of specific BQ ingredients may facilitate the development of targeted BQ formulations to prevent and/or treat potentially malignant oral disorders and oral cancer in BQ users.Entities:
Keywords: areca nut; arecoline; betel quid; carcinogenic potential; fibroblast senescence; oral carcinogenesis; oral submucous fibrosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35163557 PMCID: PMC8836171 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Heat map of the various chemical constituents found in betel quid without tobacco according to representative articles that met the eligibility criteria.
| Jain et al., 2017 [ | Franke et al., 2015 [ | Cao et al., 2019 [ | Srimany et al., 2016 [ | Shirname et al., 1983 [ | Kadi et al., 2013 [ | Tang et al., 2017 [ | Lord et al., 2002 [ | Adhikari et al., 2015 [ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arecoline | |||||||||
| Arecaidine | |||||||||
| Guvacoline | |||||||||
| Guvacine | |||||||||
| Isoguvacine | |||||||||
| Acatechu A | |||||||||
| Acatechu B | |||||||||
| Homoarecoline | |||||||||
| Arecatemine A | |||||||||
| Arecatemine B | |||||||||
| Arecatemine C | |||||||||
| Flavonoids | |||||||||
| Tannins | |||||||||
| Carbohydrates | |||||||||
| Fatty acids | |||||||||
| Chavibetol |
Figure 1Proposed pathogenic model for oral submucous fibrosis. Briefly, BQ constituents induce direct damage to both keratinocytes and fibroblasts resulting in DNA damage and production of reactive oxygen species (1). There is cross-talk between epithelial and mesenchymal compartments that amplifies the pathogenic loop and leads to fibrosis and hypoxia (2). Senescent fibroblasts promote the development of a microenvironment permissive for cancer progression (3).