| Literature DB >> 35160377 |
Nur Amirah Mamat Razali1, Risby Mohd Sohaimi2, Raja Nor Izawati Raja Othman2, Norli Abdullah1, Siti Zulaikha Ngah Demon1, Latifah Jasmani3, Wan Mohd Zain Wan Yunus4, Wan Mohd Hanif Wan Ya'acob5, Emee Marina Salleh6, Mohd Nurazzi Norizan1, Norhana Abdul Halim1.
Abstract
Inspired by nature, cellulose extracted from plant wastes has been explored, due to its great potential as an alternative for synthetic fiber and filler that contributes to structural performance. The drive of this study was to extract, treat, and evaluate the characteristics of rice straw (RS) (Oryza sativa L.) cellulose as a biodegradable reinforcement to be utilized in polymer base materials. Two routes of extraction and treatment were performed via the pulping (Route 1) and chemo-mechanical methods (Route 2), in order to discover comparative characteristics of the synthesized cellulose fiber. Comprehensive characterization of RS cellulose was carried out to determine crystallinity, surface morphology, and chemical bonding properties, using X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR), respectively. The XRD test results showed that the crystallinity index (CI) of cellulose powder (CP) decreased after the surface modification treatment, Route 2, from 64.50 to 50.10% CI for modified cellulose powder (MCP), due to the surface alteration of cellulose structure. From Route 1, the crystallinity of the fibers decreased up to 33.5% (dissolve cellulose, DC) after the pulp went through the surface modification and dissolution processes, resulting from the transformation of cellulose phase into para-crystalline structure. FESEM micrographs displayed a significant reduction of raw RS diameter from 7.78 µm to 3.34 µm (treated by Route 1) and 1.06 µm (treated by Route 2). The extracted and treated cellulose via both routes, which was considerably dominated by cellulose II because of the high percentage of alkaline used, include the dissolve cellulose (DC). The dissolution process, using NMMO solvent, was performed on the pulp fiber produced by Route 1. The fiber change from cellulose I to cellulose II after undergoes the process. Thus, the dissolution process maintains cellulose II but turned the pulp to the cellulose solution. The acquired characteristics of cellulose from RS waste, extracted by the employed methods, have a considerably greater potential for further application in numerous industries. It was concluded that the great achievement of extracted RS is obtained the nanosized fibers after surface modification treatment, which is very useful for filler in structural composite applications.Entities:
Keywords: FTIR; XRD; cellulose; chemo-mechanical; pulping; rice straw
Year: 2022 PMID: 35160377 PMCID: PMC8839608 DOI: 10.3390/polym14030387
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
The element content in RS.
| Elements | Content (wt.%) |
|---|---|
| C | 50.67 |
| O | 44.88 |
| Mg | 0.11 |
| Si | 1.99 |
| P | 0.80 |
| K | 1.20 |
| Ca | 0.36 |
Operating parameters of RS pulping method.
| Process | Reagent | Concentration (%) | Temperature (°C) | Time (h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-hydrolysis | NaOH | 2 | 170 | 3 |
| Soda pulping | NaOH | 18 | 170 | 3 |
Figure 1Schematic diagram of RS cellulose extraction methods.
Figure 2Photographs of (a) RS chip, (b) unbleached cellulose pulp (UPULP), (c) bleached cellulose pulp (PULP), (d) modified cellulose pulp (MPULP), (e) dissolve cellulose (DC), (f) cellulose powder (CP), and (g) modified cellulose powder (MCP).
Chemical composition of RS, PULP, and MPULP.
| Chemical | RS [ | Bleached Cellulose Pulp (PULP) | Modified Cellulose Pulp (MPULP) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extractives (ethanol/toluene solubility) | 4.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| Holocellulose | 75.79 | 97.40 | 95.70 |
| Hemicellulose | 22.77 | 12.50 | 19.80 |
| α-cellulose | 53.02 | 84.90 | 75.90 |
| Lignin | 30.98 | 1.03 | 2.94 |
| Ash | 12.00 | 0.27 | 0.26 |
Figure 3FESEM micrographs of (a) RS chip, (b) unbleached cellulose pulp (UPULP), (c) bleached cellulose pulp (PULP), (d) modified cellulose pulp (MPULP), (e) dissolve cellulose (DC), (f) cellulose powder (CP), and (g) modified cellulose powder (MCP).
Average diameter and size distribution of cellulose fibers.
| Sample | Diameter (µm) | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|
| RS, RAW | 7.78 | ±11.67 |
| UPULP | 4.04 | ±6.69 |
| PULP | 3.99 | ±6.66 |
| MPULP | 3.65 | ±6.08 |
| DC | 1.06 | ±1.99 |
| CP | 3.83 | ±7.54 |
| MCP | 3.34 | ±5.11 |
Figure 4X-ray diffraction spectra of extracted cellulose fibers from RS.
XRD peaks for extracted cellulose from RS.
| Lattice Plane ( | 2θ (°) | 2θ (°) | 2θ (°) | Type of Cellulose |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range Standard value of cellulose Iβ | 14.0–15.0 | 16.0–17.0 | 21.9–22.9 | Iβ |
| Raw | 14.9 | 16.2 | 22.2 | Iβ |
| Standard value of cellulose II | 12.1–16.0 | 19.8–21.0 | 21.0–22.9 | II |
| UPULP | 15.7 | 20.5 | 22.6 | II |
| PULP | 15.8 | 20.6 | 22.5 | II |
| MPULP | 12.2 | 20.7 | 21.7 | II |
| DC | 15.6 | 20.6 | 22.2 | II |
| CP | 16.1 | 20.2 | 22.3 | II |
| MCP | 15.4 | 19.9 | 21.6 | II |
Crystallinity degree, crystallite size, and internal strain of the cellulose fibers.
| Method | Sample | D-Spacing (nm) | Crystallinity Index (%) | Crystallite Size, D (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAW RS | 0.40 | 58.50 | 9.78 | |
| Route 1 | UPULP | 0.39 | 82.80 | 7.42 |
| PULP | 0.40 | 78.50 | 4.94 | |
| MPULP | 0.42 | 61.10 | 3.83 | |
| DC | 0.40 | 33.50 | 3.70 | |
| Route 2 | CP | 0.30 | 64.50 | 4.87 |
| MCP | 0.42 | 50.10 | 4.19 |
Figure 5FTIR spectra of extracted cellulose fibers from RS. OH stretching (Z1), CH stretching (Z2), NH bending and vibration of NH2 (Z3). Si-CH3 (Z4), -Si-O-Si and -Si-O-C (Z5), NH wagging (Z6).