Literature DB >> 26453844

Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of X-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose Iβ and cellulose II.

Sunghyun Nam1, Alfred D French1, Brian D Condon2, Monica Concha1.   

Abstract

The Segal method estimates the amorphous fraction of cellulose Iβ materials simply based on intensity at 18° 2θ in an X-ray diffraction pattern and was extended to cellulose II using 16° 2θ intensity. To address the dependency of Segal amorphous intensity on crystal size, cellulose polymorph, and the degree of polymorphic conversion, we simulated the diffraction patterns of cotton celluloses (Iβ and II) and compared the simulated amorphous fractions with the Segal values. The diffraction patterns of control and mercerized cottons, respectively, were simulated with perfect crystals of cellulose Iβ (1.54° FWHM) and cellulose II (2.30° FWHM) as well as 10% and 35% amorphous celluloses. Their Segal amorphous fractions were 15% and 31%, respectively. The higher Segal amorphous fraction for control cotton was attributed to the peak overlap. Although the amorphous fraction was set in the simulation, the peak overlap induced by the increase of FWHM further enhanced the Segal amorphous intensity of cellulose Iβ. For cellulose II, the effect of peak overlap was smaller; however the lower reflection of the amorphous cellulose scattering in its Segal amorphous location resulted in smaller Segal amorphous fractions. Despite this underestimation, the relatively good agreement of the Segal method with the simulation for mercerized cotton was attributed to the incomplete conversion to cellulose II. The (1-10) and (110) peaks of cellulose Iβ remained near the Segal amorphous location of cellulose II for blends of control and mercerized cotton fibers. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cellulose II; Cellulose Iβ; Cotton; Diffraction; Segal crystallinity index; Simulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26453844     DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carbohydr Polym        ISSN: 0144-8617            Impact factor:   9.381


  18 in total

1.  Production and Characterization of Gelatin Biomaterials Based on Agave Microfibers and Bentonite as Reinforcements.

Authors:  Isidra Guadalupe Ruiz-Martínez; Denis Rodrigue; Martha Lucía Arenas-Ocampo; Brenda Hildeliza Camacho-Díaz; Sandra Victoria Avila-Reyes; Javier Solorza-Feria
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  Silver-cotton nanocomposites: Nano-design of microfibrillar structure causes morphological changes and increased tenacity.

Authors:  Sunghyun Nam; Brian D Condon; Christopher D Delhom; Krystal R Fontenot
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Structure/Function Analysis of Cotton-Based Peptide-Cellulose Conjugates: Spatiotemporal/Kinetic Assessment of Protease Aerogels Compared to Nanocrystalline and Paper Cellulose.

Authors:  J Vincent Edwards; Krystal Fontenot; Falk Liebner; Nicole Doyle Nee Pircher; Alfred D French; Brian D Condon
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Nanomechanics of cellulose deformation reveal molecular defects that facilitate natural deconstruction.

Authors:  Peter N Ciesielski; Ryan Wagner; Vivek S Bharadwaj; Jason Killgore; Ashutosh Mittal; Gregg T Beckham; Stephen R Decker; Michael E Himmel; Michael F Crowley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Structural characterization of Argania spinosa Moroccan wooden artifacts during natural degradation progress using infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and X-Ray diffraction (XRD).

Authors:  Abdellatif Boukir; Somia Fellak; Pierre Doumenq
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-09-17

6.  Artemisia annua Stems a New Sustainable Source for Cellulosic Materials: Production and Characterization of Cellulose Microfibers and Nanocrystals.

Authors:  Heriarivelo Risite; Mohamed Hamid Salim; Bricharles T Oudinot; El-Houssaine Ablouh; Heriniaina T Joyeux; Houssine Sehaqui; Jean Hugues A Razafimahatratra; Abou El Kacem Qaiss; Mounir El Achaby; Zineb Kassab
Journal:  Waste Biomass Valorization       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 3.449

7.  Cavitation Fibrillation of Cellulose Fiber.

Authors:  Jakob D Redlinger-Pohn; Martin Petkovšek; Korneliya Gordeyeva; Mojca Zupanc; Alisa Gordeeva; Qilun Zhang; Matevž Dular; L Daniel Söderberg
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 6.988

8.  Comparative Study on Extraction of Cellulose Fiber from Rice Straw Waste from Chemo-Mechanical and Pulping Method.

Authors:  Nur Amirah Mamat Razali; Risby Mohd Sohaimi; Raja Nor Izawati Raja Othman; Norli Abdullah; Siti Zulaikha Ngah Demon; Latifah Jasmani; Wan Mohd Zain Wan Yunus; Wan Mohd Hanif Wan Ya'acob; Emee Marina Salleh; Mohd Nurazzi Norizan; Norhana Abdul Halim
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.329

9.  Impact of selected solvent systems on the pore and solid structure of cellulose aerogels.

Authors:  Nicole Pircher; Leticia Carbajal; Christian Schimper; Markus Bacher; Harald Rennhofer; Jean-Marie Nedelec; Helga C Lichtenegger; Thomas Rosenau; Falk Liebner
Journal:  Cellulose (Lond)       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.044

10.  Fast Production of Cellulose Nanocrystals by Hydrolytic-Oxidative Microwave-Assisted Treatment.

Authors:  Luana Amoroso; Giuseppe Muratore; Marco Aldo Ortenzi; Stefano Gazzotti; Sara Limbo; Luciano Piergiovanni
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 4.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.