| Literature DB >> 34209030 |
N M Nurazzi1,2, M R M Asyraf3, S Fatimah Athiyah1, S S Shazleen1, S Ayu Rafiqah1, M M Harussani1, S H Kamarudin4, M R Razman5, M Rahmah4, E S Zainudin1,6, R A Ilyas1,7, H A Aisyah1,6, M N F Norrrahim8, N Abdullah2, S M Sapuan1, A Khalina1.
Abstract
In the field of hybrid natural fiber polymer composites, there has been a recent surge in research and innovation for structural applications. To expand the strengths and applications of this category of materials, significant effort was put into improving their mechanical properties. Hybridization is a designed technique for fiber-reinforced composite materials that involves combining two or more fibers of different groups within a single matrix to manipulate the desired properties. They may be made from a mix of natural and synthetic fibers, synthetic and synthetic fibers, or natural fiber and carbonaceous materials. Owing to their diverse properties, hybrid natural fiber composite materials are manufactured from a variety of materials, including rubber, elastomer, metal, ceramics, glasses, and plants, which come in composite, sandwich laminate, lattice, and segmented shapes. Hybrid composites have a wide range of uses, including in aerospace interiors, naval, civil building, industrial, and sporting goods. This study intends to provide a summary of the factors that contribute to natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites' mechanical and structural failure as well as overview the details and developments that have been achieved with the composites.Entities:
Keywords: hybrid composite; mechanical performance; natural fiber; polymer composite
Year: 2021 PMID: 34209030 PMCID: PMC8271713 DOI: 10.3390/polym13132170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Schematic representations of natural fibers.
Figure 2Basic structure of lignocellulosic fiber.
Chemical composition of natural fibers.
| Natural Fiber | Lignocellulosic Components (%) | Ref. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cellulose | Hemicellulose | Lignin | ||
| Sugar Palm | 43.88 | 7.24 | 33.24 | [ |
| Bagasse | 32 to 34 | 19 to 24 | 25 to 32 | [ |
| Bamboo | 73.83 | 12.49 | 10.15 | [ |
| Flax | 60 to 81 | 14 to 20.6 | 2.2 to 5 | [ |
| Hemp | 70 to 92 | 18 to 22 | 3 to 5 | |
| Jute | 51 to 84 | 12to 20 | 5 to 13 | |
| Kenaf | 44 to 87 | 22 | 15 to 19 | |
| Ramie | 68 to 76 | 13 to 15 | 0.6 to 1 | |
| Sisal | 65.8 | 12 | 9.9 | [ |
| Pineapple | 66.2 | 19.5 | 4.2 | [ |
| Coir | 32 to 43 | 0.15 to 0.25 | 40 to 45 | [ |
Comparison the physical and mechanical performance of natural fiber with synthetic fibers.
| Fiber | Density (g/cm3) | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Elongation at Break (%) | Tensile Modulus (GPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sugar Palm | 1.292 | 156.96 | 7.98 | 4.96 |
| Bagasse | 1.5 | 290 | - | 17 |
| Bamboo | 1.25 | 140 to 230 | - | 11 to 17 |
| Flax | 0.6 to 1.1 | 345 to 1035 | 2.7 to 3.2 | 27.6 |
| Hemp | 1.48 | 690 | 1.6 to 4 | 70 |
| Jute | 1.3 | 393 to 773 | 1.5 to 1.8 | 26.5 |
| Kenaf | 1.45 | 215.4 | 1.6 | 53 |
| Sisal | 1.5 | 511 to 535 | 2.0 to 2.5 | 9.4 to 22 |
| Ramie | 1.5 | 560 | 2.5 to 3.8 | 24.5 |
| Pineapple | 0.8 to 1.6 | 400 to 627 | 14.5 | 1.44 |
| Coir | 1.2 | 138.7 | 30 | 4 to 6 |
| E-Glass | 2.5 | 2000 to 3500 | 0.5 | 70 |
| S-Glass | 2.5 | 4570 | 2.8 | 86 |
| Aramid | 1.4 | 3000 to 3150 | 3.3 to 3.7 | 63.0 to 67.0 |
| Kevlar | 1.44 | 3000 | 2.5 to 3.7 | 60 |
Summary of natural fibers characteristics and applications in polymer composites.
| Natural | Description | Ref. |
|---|---|---|
| Bast fiber | ||
| Flax fiber |
Flax ( According to the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), flax was cultivated on a total area of 240,293 hectares (0.24 billion m2) in 2018, yielding 868,374 tons of flax. Flax fibers have been widely utilized as a reinforcement material in a variety of polymer composites, but polypropylene (PP) is the most suitable for flax fibers due to its low density, low thermal expansion, superior water resistance, and potential to be recycled. | [ |
| Hemp |
Hemp ( In 2018, 60,657 tons of hemp tow waste, or beaten stalks of the hemp plant, were recorded worldwide Hemp is undeniably a versatile fiber; however, non-cellulosic ingredients such as hemicelluloses, lignin, pectin, fat, and waxes must be removed before being used. Hemp fibers have also been used to reinforce polymer composites. Neves et al. [ | [ |
| Jute |
Jute has reportedly been used to fabricate textiles in the Indus valley civilization since the third millennium B.C. It is the most important fiber in Bangladesh and Eastern India, and it is also recognized as the golden fiber of Bangladesh. Jute is mainly produced in India, Bangladesh, and China. It was harvested on 1,546,953 ha (1.55 billion m2) around the world in 2018, with a total volume of 3,633,550 tons. It has a high aspect ratio, superior strength-to-weight ratio, and excellent insulating properties. Different chemical treatments may be needed to improve the mechanical properties of the jute fiber. Gupta et al. [ | [ |
| Kenaf |
Kenaf ( Kenaf fiber can be extracted from the bark (bast) and core of kenaf stalks, which make up to 40% and 60% of the stalk’s dry weight, respectively. Kenaf was first introduced to Malaysia in 2010 as a tobacco replacement and has grown drastically to become Malaysia’s third most important industrial crop after palm oil and rubber. The National Kenaf and Tobacco Board of Malaysia has allocated 2000 ha (2 million m2) of land to smallholders for the development of kenaf plantations to meet the growing global demand. Kenaf has been utilized in a variety of fiber-reinforced polymer composites due to its interesting features: low cost, light weight, renewability, biodegradability, and high specific mechanical properties. | [ |
| Leaf fiber | ||
| Pineapple |
Pineapple ( According to Leao et al. [ PALF outperforms other fiber groups as its specific modulus and specific strength are comparable to glass fiber, and its aspect ratio is four times that of jute. Odusote and Kumar [ | [ |
| Abaca |
Abaca ( Abaca fibers are extracted from the leaf stems. The banana can be harvested three times a year, providing a constant supply of abaca fibers. In 2018, 108,131 ton of abaca were produced worldwide. Abaca has been utilized in a variety of fiber-reinforced polymer composites due to its advantages: long fiber length, strong, flexible, and durable. Sinha et al. [ | [ |
| Sisal |
Sisal ( As a result of its superior strength, sisal has often been used for agricultural twine. In 2018, 198,309 tons of sisal were produced around the world. Rohit and Dixit [ Gupta et al. [ | [ |
| Straw fiber | ||
| Corn |
Corn ( Corn incorporation into polymers could have both economic and environmental benefits. Corn stover, including the husks, stalks, and leaves, has a high cellulose content and has been shown to be a good source of nanocellulose. The unique characteristics of corn husk fiber such as flexibility, low density, moderate strength, good elongation, and durability will benefit corn fiber products, including composites. | [ |
| Wheat |
Wheat is one of the most widely consumed cereals on the world, and the most common species is bread wheat ( The global supply of this fiber is estimated to be around 529 million tons per year. Wheat straw is inexpensive and easy to obtain as agricultural waste. After harvest, the majority of wheat straw is left to decompose, whereas in certain countries, it is burnt in open fields, posing a threat to air pollution. Commercial applications of wheat straw are still being studied, regardless of the fact that a limited amount of wheat straw is used as animal feedstock and bedding. Wheat straw has been discovered to have potential in a variety of applications, including composites, anion exchangers, and panel boards. Nanocellulose produced from wheat straw using a chemi-mechanical approach had diameters ranging from 10 to 80 nanometers. | [ |
| Seed/fruit fiber | ||
| Coir |
Coconut fiber ( In 2018, global coir demand hit 1,238,725 tons, with Malaysia alone producing 21,521 tons. Coconut coir fibers have superior mechanical strength and weather tolerance when compared to other fibers due to their higher lignin and microfibrillar angle as well as lower cellulose and hemicellulose content. Olveira et al. [ | [ |
| Cotton |
Cotton is an important agricultural crop that belongs to the genus Cotton grows around the plant’s seeds that is mainly used to produce clothes and a variety of other daily products for a large portion of the global population. Cotton has a high cellulose content, which has led to the discovery of nanocellulose synthesis by many researchers. According to Morais et al. [ Composites based on cotton fibers recovered from textiles that make up to 80% by weight fiber have been widely used for thermo-acoustic insulation. Since cotton is commonly used in fabrics, many attempts have been made to incorporate antimicrobial agents with cotton including argentum/argentum bromide–titanium oxide and copper oxide to enhance the technical quality of fabrics. The findings from Perelshtein et al. [ | [ |
| Kapok |
Kapok ( The hollowness of kapok circular cross-section cellulose is the highest of all-natural fibers, ranging from 80 to 90%, making it ideal for making low-density polymer composites. Kapok fiber has a high cellulose content, but it has a lower cellulose content and a higher lignin content as compared to cotton fiber. Jayaweera et al. [ | [ |
| Grass/reed fiber | ||
| Bamboo |
Bamboo has been marketed as a promising future sustainable woody biomass resource owing to its good strength and rapid growth cycle. Around 1000 bamboo species have been identified in the world, and interestingly, new species are found almost every day. Bamboo fiber has excellent mechanical properties, rendering it a promising replacement for conventional fibers in composite materials such as glass and carbon. Bamboo consists of approximately 47% cellulose and 26% lignin, which is much higher lignin content than most natural fibers and other substrates, resulting in its high strength. Chang et al. [ | [ |
| Sugarcane bagasse |
Sugarcane bagasse is the most widely available lignocellulosic biomass on the world that consists of 41.0 to 55.0 wt % of cellulose, 20.0 to 27.5 wt % of hemicellulose, 18.0 to 26.3 wt % of lignin, and ≈ 7.0 wt % of other compounds such as inorganic materials. Brazil is the world’s leading sugarcane producer, producing 743.0 million metric tons per year. There are approximately 640 to 660 million tons of sugarcane that could be refined into 28,500 million liters of alcohol, yielding 160 million metric tons of sugarcane bagasse. Sugarcane bagasse often does not meet the requirements for classification as long fibers. Consequently, the fiber is often left unused, and its use as a composite filler is strongly considered as a potential possibility. Ghaderi et al. [ Bagasse fiber has been thoroughly investigated as a polymer reinforcement agent, and there is an excellent potential in developing bagasse-based composites for a range of building, automotive, and construction applications. | [ |
| f. Wood fiber | ||
| Softwood |
Softwood trees are non-porous, lack vessels, and grow in a pyramid shape, with a narrow top and a wider bottom with fibers that are longer than hardwood fibers (average length of 4.1 mm and a width of 2.5 μm). Most of the softwood anatomy is simple, whereby longitudinal tracheid makes up 90% or more of its volume that transports water and provides mechanical strength to the wood. Since softwood has a higher aspect ratio than hardwood, it is favored for composite applications. Softwood composites were stiffer than hardwood composites probably due to the higher lignin content (ex: spruce (softwood)—28% and aspen (hardwood)—18%). | [ |
| Hardwood |
Hardwood fibers have an average length of 1.2 mm and a width of 3 μm. Unlike softwood, hardwood has separate cells that perform the functions of conduction and support. Hardwood is distinguished from softwood by the presence of complex water-conducting cells known as vessel elements. Since these vessel elements are narrow tubes with open ends known as pores, hardwood is referred to as “porous wood”. As a result of the higher cellulose content, hardwood composites had better tensile strength, impact strength, and elongation. | [ |
Figure 3The swelling and water state based on the moisture content in natural fiber cells. Adapted from ref. [97].
Figure 4The mechanism of water absorption on the fiber–matrix interface. (a) Formation of micro-cracks due to fiber swelling; (b) Penetration and water molecules transfer through the micro-cracks; (c) Water-soluble substance leaching; and (d) De-bonding of the fiber–matrix interface. Reproduced from ref. [2].
Figure 5Fiber bridging mechanism of unidirectional laminates. Reproduced from ref. [111].
Figure 6Micro-buckling fracture of a natural fiber composite consisting of hemp yarns with 10° orientation; (a) Stress–strain response graph and (b) Example of sample fractures in micro-buckling. Adapted from ref. [122].
Figure 7Summary for hybridization of natural fibers with other materials discussed in this section.
Figure 8Schematic diagram of the hybridization layer of sugar palm yarn fibers with glass fiber mat-reinforced unsaturated polyester composite. Reproduced from ref. [136].
Figure 9SEM images of hybrid composites: (a) fiber fracture, (b) fiber pull-out, (c) adhesion at the fiber–matrix interface. Reproduced from ref. [146].
Studies on hybrid natural fiber/natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites.
| Fiber 1 | Fiber 2 | Parameter | Matrix Type | Processing Technique | Mechanical Performance | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB) fiber mat | Woven jute (Jw) | Layering pattern of hybrid composite: EFB/Jw/EFB and Jw/EFB/Jw | Epoxy | Hand lay-up |
It was found that the tensile and flexural properties of the hybrid composite was higher than that of the non-hybrid composite. | [ |
| Banana fibers (B) | Woven coconut sheath (C) | Random composite orientation: | Unsaturated polyester | Compression molding |
There was not much difference in the mechanical properties between the pure coconut sheath and banana hybrid composites. However, the flexural strength was higher for the coconut sheath hybrid composite. The mechanical properties were also found to vary with the layering pattern. | [ |
| PALF | Kenaf fiber (KF) | Fiber loading: (PF:PALF:KF) | Phenol formaldehyde | Hand lay-up |
The hybrid composite improved in term of tensile strength (46.96 MPa) and modulus (6.84 GPa), flexural strength (84.21 MPa) and modulus (5.81 GPa), and impact strength (5.39 kJ/m2) as compared with the PALF/PF and KF/PF composites. The hybrid composite also showed the highest storage modulus and loss modulus. | [ |
| Unidirectional long flax fiber (F) | Woven sugar palm fiber (S) | Fiber stacking sequences: | Epoxy | Hot press molding |
Tensile strength and flexural strength of the hybrid composites increased by nearly 3-folds and 2-folds, respectively. The results from dynamic mechanical analysis and short beam test revealed that the hybridization of F fiber into the S fiber-reinforced composites caused superior mechanical strength, dynamic mechanical properties, and interlaminar shear strength. | [ |
| Jute fiber (J) | Curaua | Fiber hybridization and treatment: | Epoxy | Hand lay-up |
The tensile, flexural, and impact properties of hybrid composites are significantly improved by the addition of the untreated fibers to J fiber-based composites. The alkaline treatment had a positive impact on the mechanical properties of the composite, while for the J + C hybrid composites, the alkaline treatment had a negative effect on the tensile and impact properties. The mixed (alkalization + silanization) treatment had a positive effect on the J + C flexural properties, while it decreased the flexural properties for the J + S composite. | [ |
| Aloe vera mat (AVM) and flax mat (FM) | Sisal fiber (SF) | Fiber arrangement: | Epoxy | Hand lay-up |
The S2 hybrid composites exhibit improved tensile strength, flexural strength, impact strength, and hardness properties. It is also proven that the hybrid composite formed with FM positioned at the peripheral layers (S2) possesses higher strength in terms of tensile, flexural, impact, and hardness than the hybrid composite formed with AVM at the peripheral layers (S1). This work also highlights that the flexural and impact property of fiber mats-reinforced in epoxy are moderately superior than that of the neat epoxy material. | [ |
| Roselle fiber (RF) | Sugar palm fibers (SPF) | Fiber ratios: | PU | Melt mixing and hot compression |
The RF/SPF hybrid composites increased its impact strength corresponding to the increases in the SPF content of the composites. However, the tensile and flexural properties decreased due to poor interfacial bonding between the fiber and matrix. | [ |
| Coir fiber (CF) | PALF | Fiber loading of PLA:CF: PALF (wt %): 100:0:0, 70:30:0, 70:0:30, | PLA | Melt mixing method |
The hybrid composites had higher tensile and flexural modulus compared to those of neat PLA. The strength values were improved upon the addition of PALF, while impact tests showed enhanced strength results upon the addition of CF. The dynamic mechanical analysis results confirmed that the storage and loss moduli of the hybrid composites increased with respect to those of the neat PLA, whereas the tan δ decreased. The coefficient of thermal expansion was decreased with the addition of fiber. | [ |
| Sisal fiber | Hemp fiber | - | PLA | Melt processing and injection molding |
The achieved mean tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and specific tensile strength of hybrid composites were improved compared to neat PLA. The flexural modulus and specific flexural strength of hybrid composites also showed better performance than those of neat PLA. Incorporation of sisal and hemp fiber with PLA remarkably increased the impact strength of composites. | [ |
| Wood fiber | Rice husk | Wood content: 10%, 20%, and 30% | PP | Injection molding |
The tensile modulus of hybrid composites increased as the filler loading increased. The flexural strength decreased with the filler loading. | [ |
| Woven jute | Woven flax | Fiber ratio: | PLA | Compression molding |
Hybrid composites achieved higher flexural strength and modulus, whereas flax/PLA have higher tensile strength. For impact strength, the hybrid composite has achieved a higher value. The hybrid composites have lower dynamic mechanical properties than the other types of composites. | [ |
| Kenaf fiber (KF) | Aloe vera fiber (AF) | Composite compositions: | PLA | Compression molding |
The mechanical properties were found to be increased upon 15 wt % KF, 15 wt % AF hybridization, and 1 wt % MMT clay incorporated. The 1 wt % MMT included hybrid composite exhibited increased tensile strength, flexural strength, impact strength, and abrasion resistance compared to virgin PLA. The tensile and flexural moduli of these composites are improved compared with neat PLA. | [ |
Figure 10Schematic diagram of hybridization of a woven kenaf with synthetic fibers mat-reinforced polymer composite. Reproduced from ref. [159].
Summary of works on hybrid natural fiber/synthetic fiber-reinforced polymer composites.
| Natural Fiber | Synthetic Fiber | Matrix Type | Processing Technique | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFB | Glass | Unsaturated polyester | RTM | [ |
| Basalt and flax | Carbon | Epoxy | Hand lay-up and vacuum bagging | [ |
| Short basalt | Short fiber PP | Epoxy | Injection molding | [ |
| Flax | Carbon | Epoxy | Vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) | [ |
| Sisal | Glass | PP | Single extrusion machine and press consolidation | [ |
| Vetiveria zizanioides/Jute | Glass | Vinyl ester | Hand lay-up | [ |
| EFB | Glass | PP | Extrusion and injection molding | [ |
| Areca sheath and jute | Woven-glass | Epoxy | Hand lay-up | [ |
| Sugar palm yarn | Woven-glass | Unsaturated polyester | Hand lay-up | [ |
| Longitudinal basalt | Woven-glass | Unsaturated polyester-resin | Hand lay-up | [ |
| Bamboo powder | Glass | Epoxy | Hand lay-up | [ |
| Bamboo | Glass | Epoxy | Curing | [ |
| Bamboo | Glass | Unsaturated polyester | Hand lay-up | [ |
Studies on hybrid natural fiber/metal-reinforced polymer composites.
| Natural Fiber | Metal Laminate Type | Matrix Type | Processing Technique | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jute fiber | Aluminum and magnesium | Epoxy | Hand lay-up and compression molding | [ |
| Plain sisal fabric | Aluminum | Epoxy | Cold pressing | [ |
| Unidirectional tape flax fibers and sugar palm fibers | Aluminum alloy | Epoxy | Hand lay-up and hot press | [ |
| Kenaf fiber, flax fiber, and carbon fiber | Aluminum alloy | Epoxy | Hand lay-up | [ |
| Woven mat jute fiber | Aluminum and copper | Epoxy | Compression molding | [ |
| Plain woven kenaf and woven E-glass | Annealed aluminum | PP | Hot pressing | [ |
| Plain and twill woven kenaf and PALF | Aluminum | PP | Hot molding compression | [ |
Figure 11The (a) Tensile stress–strain curve and failure mode and (b) Flexural behavior and failure mode of sisal fabric, SFRC and SiRAL. Reproduced from [182].
Figure 12SEM micrograph of tensile fracture of (a) NFML and (b) NF composite. Reproduced from ref. [191].
Studies on hybrid natural fiber/carbonaceous material-reinforced polymer composites.
| Carbonaceous Material | Natural Fiber | Matrix Type | Key Findings | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GO and graphene flakes | Untreated jute fiber and alkaline-treated jute fiber | Epoxy | The Young’s modulus and tensile strength of graphene-based jute fiber composites jute−epoxy composites is increased by ≈324% and ≈110%, respectively, more than untreated jute fiber composites. | [ |
| GO | Curaua fiber (CF) | Unsaturated polyester | The tensile and flexural strength of CF/GO-reinforced unsaturated polyester-based composites increased by 156% and 186%, respectively, in comparison to the neat unsaturated polyester. | [ |
| GO | Curaua fiber (CF) | Epoxy | The CF/GO epoxy-based composites increased in yield strength by 64%, tensile strength by 40%, Young’s modulus by 60%, and toughness by 28% compared to the CF-reinforced epoxy composite. | [ |
| Exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets | Kenaf fiber | PLA | The addition of 5 wt % xGnP increased the flexural modulus by 25 to 30% but did not increase the strength. The addition of xGnP to the heat distortion temperature had a beneficial impact but only at higher fiber loadings. | [ |
| Graphene | Bagasse fiber (BS) | PP | Tensile, flexural, and notched impact strength values were greatest in composites containing 0.1 wt % graphene and 30 wt % BF. | [ |
| GO | Sisal fiber (SF) | PP | The combined treatment of GO and maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene (MAPP) improved the mechanical properties, melting temperature, and water resistance of the GO-SF/MAPP-PP composite significantly. | [ |
| CNTs | Bamboo fiber | Epoxy | The composite’s mechanical (tensile, flexural, and impact) and water resistance properties increased after CNTs were added. There was a significant increase in impact strength by 84.5%. | [ |
| CNTs, acid-treated (ACNT) and acid silane treated (SCNT) | Kenaf fiber | Epoxy | The tensile, flexural, and impact properties of the kenaf/epoxy composite were strengthened by 43.30%, 21.10%, and 130%, respectively, when 1 wt % acid-silane treated CNT was included. | [ |
| MWCNTs) | Cotton cellulose nanofiber (CNF-C) | PU | The PU matrix completely cross-linked with CNF-C and CNTs demonstrated good mechanical properties and sensing efficiency. The hybrid composite can accurately sense massive strains more than 103 times, and water-induced form recovery can help to sustain sensing precision after material fatigue. | [ |
| MWCNTs | Oil palm shell (OPS) | Unsaturated polyester | It was discovered that a small amount of pristine MWCNTs dispersed inside the natural filler unsaturated polyester composite may improve the mechanical properties of the hybrid composite. | [ |
Figure 13Potential application of hybrid natural fiber composite in aircraft radome.
Figure 14Steps of boat fabrication from hybrid material of sugar palm fiber and glass fiber (a) gel coat and catalyst were applied onto the inside surface of the mould (b) lay-up process for glass fiber with consistent orientation (c) mixture of unsaturated polyester resin and catalyst spread on top of the fiber glass and rolled using iron roller (d) lay-up process for sugar palm fiber, followed with the same process at (c,e) painted with powder reinforcement unsaturated polyester to protect all material such as sugar palm fiber and glass fiber from water. Reproduced from ref. [230].
Figure 15Innovation of honeycomb-filled structure configuration, which potentially can be used in cross-arms.
Automotive models and their components implementing natural fiber composites.
| Models | Brands | Components |
|---|---|---|
| C3 Picasso, C5 | Citroen | Boot linings, mud guards, interior door paneling, parcel shelves, and door panels |
| Passat Variant, Golf, A4, Bora | Volkswagen | Door panel, boot-liner, seat back, and boot-lid finish panel |
| Vectra, Astra, Zafira | Opel | Head-liner panel, pillar cover panel, door panels, and instrumental panel |
| 3, 5 and 7 series | BMW | Noise insulation panels, headliner panel, seat back, door panels, molded foot well linings, and boot-lining |
| Mondeo CD 162, Focus | Ford | Floor trays, door inserts, door panels, B-pillar, and boot-liner |
| C70, V70 | Volvo | Seat padding, natural foams, cargo floor tray, dash, boards and ceilings |
| Eco Elise | Lotus | Seats, interior carpets, body panels, and spoiler, |
| ES3 | Toyota | Pillar garnish and other interior parts |
| 2000 | Rover | Rear storage shelf/panel, and insulations |
| Fiat SpA | Mitsubishi | Indoor cladding, seat back, cargo area floor, door panels, lining, instrumental panel, floor mats, and floor panels |
| 406 | Peugeot | Seat backs, parcel shelf, front and rear door panels |
| A, C, E, and S class | Daimler Chrysler | Pillar cover panel, door panels, car windshield/car dashboard, and business table |
Figure 16Natural fibers composites as automotive components. Reproduced from ref. [240].