Literature DB >> 9303395

A multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia.

T M File1, J Segreti, L Dunbar, R Player, R Kohler, R R Williams, C Kojak, A Rubin.   

Abstract

Five hundred ninety patients were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of 7 to 14 days of levofloxacin treatment with that of ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Patients received either intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin (500 mg once daily) or the comparative agents, parenteral ceftriaxone (1 to 2 g once to twice daily) and/or oral cefuroxime axetil (500 mg twice daily). Erythromycin or doxycycline could be added to the comparator arm at the investigator's discretion. The decision to use an intravenous or oral antimicrobial agent for initial therapy was made by the investigator. Clinical and microbiological evaluations were completed at the baseline, during treatment, 5 to 7 days posttherapy, and 3 to 4 weeks posttherapy. Four hundred fifty-six patients (226 given levofloxacin and 230 administered ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil) were evaluable for clinical efficacy. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae were isolated in 15 and 12%, respectively, of clinically evaluable patients. One hundred fifty atypical pathogens were identified: 101 were Chlamydia pneumoniae, 41 were Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and 8 were Legionella pneumophila. Clinical success at 5 to 7 days posttherapy was superior for the levofloxacin group (96%) compared with the ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil group (90%) (95% confidence interval [CI] of -10.7 to -1.3). Among patients with typical respiratory pathogens who were evaluable for microbiological efficacy, the overall bacteriologic eradication rates were superior for levofloxacin (98%) compared with the ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil group (85%) (95% CI of -21.6 to -4.8). Levofloxacin eradicated 100% of the most frequently reported respiratory pathogens (i.e., H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae) and provided a >98% clinical success rate in patients with atypical pathogens. Both levofloxacin and ceftriaxone-cefuroxime axetil eradicated 100% of the S. pneumoniae cells detected in blood culture. Drug-related adverse events were reported in 5.8% of patients receiving levofloxacin and in 8.5% of patients administered ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil. Gastrointestinal and central and peripheral nervous system adverse events were the most common events reported in each treatment group. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that treatment with levofloxacin is superior to ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil therapy in the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9303395      PMCID: PMC164046          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.41.9.1965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  25 in total

1.  Cefuroxime, a beta-lactamase-resistant cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of gram-positive and -negative activity.

Authors:  H C Neu; K P Fu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Ofloxacin versus standard therapy in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization. Pneumonia Study Group.

Authors:  J F Plouffe; M T Herbert; T M File; I Baird; J N Parsons; J B Kahn; K T Rielly-Gauvin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  International experiences with ceftriaxone in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  C Grassi; P Mangiarotti
Journal:  Chemioterapia       Date:  1987-10

4.  In vitro activity of DR-3355, an optically active ofloxacin.

Authors:  T Une; T Fujimoto; K Sato; Y Osada
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  A comparison of oral cefuroxime axetil and oral amoxycillin in lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  T J Cooper; E Ladusans; P E Williams; V Polychronopoulos; H Gaya; R M Rudd
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Pneumonia associated with the TWAR strain of Chlamydia.

Authors:  T J Marrie; J T Grayston; S P Wang; C C Kuo
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Treatment of lower respiratory tract infections with ceftriaxone and cefotaxime. A comparative study.

Authors:  G F Abbate; I Alagia; E Giaquinto; V Leonessa; L Savioli; P Altucci; M Caputi; C Guarino; E Micillo; E Catena
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.580

8.  Blinded comparison of cefuroxime to cefaclor for lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  C J Schleupner; W C Anthony; J Tan; T M File; P Lifland; W Craig; B Vogelman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-02

9.  Randomised comparison of ceftriaxone and cefamandole therapy in lower respiratory tract infections in an elderly population.

Authors:  M J Bittner; M P Pugsley; E A Horowitz; D G Strike; C C Sanders; L C Preheim
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Ceftriaxone therapy in adults with severe lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  P D Potgieter; D M Linton; A A Forder; H Plumb
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1986-04-12
View more
  68 in total

Review 1.  The next generation: fluoroquinolones in the management of acute lower respiratory infection in adults.

Authors:  P J Moss; R G Finch
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Microbiological efficacy of levofloxacin for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia due to Chlamydia pneumoniae.

Authors:  M R Hammerschlag; P M Roblin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparative activities of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an In vitro dynamic model.

Authors:  S H Zinner; K Simmons; D Gilbert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pharmacokinetics of a clarithromycin suspension administered via nasogastric tube to seriously ill patients.

Authors:  D N Fish; E Abraham
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  BTS Guidelines for the Management of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Adults.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 6.  Chlamydia pneumoniae and atherosclerosis: critical assessment of diagnostic methods and relevance to treatment studies.

Authors:  Jens Boman; Margaret R Hammerschlag
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  J G Bartlett; S F Dowell; L A Mandell; T M File; D M Musher; M J Fine
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-09-07       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 8.  Clinical role of protein binding of quinolones.

Authors:  Eugénie Bergogne-Bérézin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Empiric oral monotherapy for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: an idea whose time has come.

Authors:  B A Cunha
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 10.  Mycoplasma pneumoniae and its role as a human pathogen.

Authors:  Ken B Waites; Deborah F Talkington
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.