Literature DB >> 8521766

Drug utilisation review (DUR) of the third generation cephalosporins. Focus on ceftriaxone, ceftazidime and cefotaxime.

A Adu1, C L Armour.   

Abstract

Six parenteral third generation cephalosporins have been introduced into clinical use in the past 10 years. The 3 most frequently available agents are cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and ceftazidime. These 3 third generation cephalosporins are characterised by a broad spectrum of activity and increased stability to beta-lactamases compared with the first and second generation cephalosporins. However, there are growing numbers of reports of resistance to these agents with increasing use. The major differences in the properties of the 3 agents are the long half-life of ceftriaxone and its dual route of elimination. Ceftazidime is best restricted to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections where other agents are contraindicated or ineffective. Cefotaxime and ceftriaxone can be used in nosocomial Gram-negative infections where P. aeruginosa can be ruled out. The types and incidences of adverse drug reactions are not different for the 3 agents. A number of drug utilisation review (DUR) studies of these agents in the hospital setting have reported a considerable incidence of inappropriate use and substantial avoidable costs. There are methodological problems with most of the DUR studies, especially the criteria and the methods of cost estimation. The use of pharmacoeconomic methodology could ensure more realistic cost estimation; however, outcome data are, in most cases, not available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8521766     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199550030-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  96 in total

1.  Reversible ceftriaxone-associated biliary pseudolithiasis in children.

Authors:  U B Schaad; J Wedgwood-Krucko; H Tschaeppeler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Comparison of ceftriaxone (1 x 1 g/day) versus cefotaxime (3 x 1 g/day) for gynecologic and obstetric infections. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  G J Gerstner
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 3.  Oral ciprofloxacin: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the treatment of serious infections.

Authors:  J A Balfour; D Faulds
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Development of resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics with special reference to third-generation cephalosporins.

Authors:  E Collatz; L Gutmann; R Williamson; J F Acar
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Cefotaxime concentration in cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  A Karimi; K Seeger; D Stolke; H Knothe
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 6.  Third generation cephalosporins: safety profiles after 10 years of clinical use.

Authors:  H C Neu
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.126

7.  Pharmacokinetics and cerebrospinal fluid penetration of ceftazidime in children with meningitis.

Authors:  J L Blumer; S C Aronoff; C M Myers; C A O'Brien; J D Klinger; M D Reed
Journal:  Dev Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1985

8.  Comparison of ceftriaxone and traditional therapy of bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  B L Congeni
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Trends in antibiotic utilization and bacterial resistance. Report of the National Nosocomial Resistance Surveillance Group.

Authors:  C H Ballow; J J Schentag
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.803

10.  Use of cefotaxime, a beta-lactamase stable cephalosporin, in the therapy of serious infections, including those due to multiresistant organisms.

Authors:  E L Francke; H C Neu
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  7 in total

1.  Using cost of infection as a tool to demonstrate a difference in prophylactic antibiotic efficacy: a prospective randomized comparison of the pharmacoeconomic effectiveness of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime prophylaxis in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  John C Woodfield; Andre M Van Rij; Ross A Pettigrew; Antje van der Linden; Donna Bolt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Cost-effectiveness of ceftriaxone 1 g vs second-generation cephalosporins in the treatment of pneumonia in general medical wards in Germany.

Authors:  E S Dietrich; U Joseph; F Vogel; S Howaldt; K H Kullmann; U Frank; F D Daschner
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  A new anti-microbial combination prolongs the latency period, reduces acute histologic chorioamnionitis as well as funisitis, and improves neonatal outcomes in preterm PROM.

Authors:  JoonHo Lee; Roberto Romero; Sun Min Kim; Piya Chaemsaithong; Chan-Wook Park; Joong Shin Park; Jong Kwan Jun; Bo Hyun Yoon
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2015-09-16

Review 4.  Place of parenteral cephalosporins in the ambulatory setting: clinical evidence.

Authors:  D Nathwani
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Pharmacological properties of parenteral cephalosporins: rationale for ambulatory use.

Authors:  E Strehl; F Kees
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Ceftriaxone-Associated Biliary and Cardiopulmonary Adverse Events in Neonates: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Patrick C Donnelly; Rebecca M Sutich; Ryan Easton; Oluwatunmise A Adejumo; Todd A Lee; Latania K Logan
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.022

7.  A new antibiotic regimen treats and prevents intra-amniotic inflammation/infection in patients with preterm PROM.

Authors:  JoonHo Lee; Roberto Romero; Sun Min Kim; Piya Chaemsaithong; Bo Hyun Yoon
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2015-12-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.