| Literature DB >> 35146152 |
Md Shoriful Islam1, Mst Shahnaj Parvin2, Md Ekramul Islam2.
Abstract
Medicinal plants are sources of antioxidant which may protect the body against oxidative stress related diseases and can be used as human food supplements. In this investigation, seeds of Hygrophila schulli (M. R. Almeida & S. M. Almeida) (Fam.-Acanthaceae), a herbaceous plant well known for its medicinal properties, has been examined for antioxidant activity of crude methanolic extract (CME) and its fraction using in vitro and in vivo assay as well as their protective activity against oxidative damage of DNA and RBC. Total phenolic and flavonoid content have also been estimated using the aluminum chloride colorimetric and Folin-Ciocalteu method. Among the different fractions of CME, Ethyl acetate fraction (EAF) had higher antioxidant activity in vitro assay and was selected for in vivo antioxidant activity in cadmium intoxicated mice. The EAF showed a significant (p < 0.05) increase in serum catalase and SOD activity compared to the control group. TBARS levels were restored to 17.42 and 19.19 nmol/mg protein, respectively, after treatment with EAF and standard ascorbic acid (AA); compared to the normal group (14.96 nmol/mg protein). Similarly, levels of albumin, bilirubin, uric acid, and alkaline phosphatase were also brought back to normal levels. EAF's protective role against oxidative damage of DNA has shown a significant reduction in destroying of nicked DNA. RBC as a target of oxidation by H2O2 and HOCl, EAF showed inhibition of oxidation in a concentration-dependent manner, compared to standard gallic acid. In this study, we confirmed that EAF could scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS) thus preventing DNA strand scission and the extract can be used as a functional food or nutraceutical product for health benefits.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; Catalase; DPPH; Erythrocytes; Gel electrophoresis; SOD; TBARS
Year: 2022 PMID: 35146152 PMCID: PMC8802844 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08767
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Total phenolic and flavonoid content of CME and fractions of H. schulli seeds.
| Fractions | TPC (mg of GAE/g) | TFC (mg of QE/g) |
|---|---|---|
| CME | 226.06 ± 4.35 | 154.45 ± 2.79 |
| PEF | 27.67 ± 4.04 | 104.53 ± 3.02 |
| CHF | 87.03 ± 1.80 | 55.75 ± 2.53 |
| EAF | 270.63 ± 3.64 | 479.70 ± 5.46 |
| AQF | 173.20 ± 5.82 | 223.61 ± 5.77 |
All values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3), SD = Standard deviation, CME = Crude methanol extract, CHF = Chloroform fraction, EAF = Ethyl acetate fraction, AQF = Aqueous fraction, GA = Gallic acid, TPC = Total phenolic content. TFC = Total flavonoid content.
In vitro antioxidant activity of CME, fractions, and standard.
| Name of Experiment/Fractions | DPPH radical scavenging assay (IC50) | Hydrogen peroxide scavenging assay (% SCV for 200 μg/ml) | Reducing power capacity (Absorbance for 50 μg/ml) | Total Antioxidant Assay (Absorbance for 200 μg/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CME | 14 | 35.88 | 2.171 ± 0.002 | 0.811 ± 0.013 |
| PEF | 58 | 24.96 | 0.722 ± 0.005 | 0.322 ± 0.007 |
| CHF | 40 | 28.45 | 0.716 ± 0.003 | 0.410 ± 0.013 |
| EAF | 3.1 | 57.82 | 2.861 ± 0.040 | 1.096 ± 0.059 |
| AQF | 19 | 43.35 | 2.383 ± 0.002 | 0.504 ± 0.022 |
| Standard | 2 (BHT) | 86.04 (BHT) | 3.565 ± 0.050 (GA) | 1.608 ± 0.059 (GA) |
All values are expressed as mean ± SD, (n = 3). Here, SD = Standard deviation, CME = Crude methanol extract, CHF = Chloroform fraction, EAF = Ethyl acetate fraction, AQF = Aqueous fraction,.GA = Gallic acid, BHT = Butylated hydroxyl toluene.
Figure 1DPPH radical scavenging activity of CME and its fractions of H. schulli seeds. a: % of Scavenging activity on DPPH radical; b: IC50 value. Each value is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3), SD = Standard deviation.
In vivo antioxidant assay of CME, EAF, and standard AA.
| Name of Experiment | SOD (Enzyme unit (U)/mg Tissue) | Catalase (H2O2 decomposed | LPO (TBARS level nmol/mg wet tissue) | Albumin (gm/dl) | Bilirubin (mg/dl) | Uric acid (mg/dl) | Alkaline phosphatase (U/l) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.792 | 4.312 ± 0.644 | 17.192 ± 0.689 | 17.52 ± 0.526 | 2.36 ± 0.343 | 104.1 ± 3.978 | 20.6 ± 2.408 | |
| 0.408* | 2.411 ± 0.557* | 35.48 ± 2.215* | 10.37 ± 0.873* | 1.57 ± 0.306* | 59.97 ± 4.725* | 04.0 ± 2.646* | |
| 0.516** | 2.860 ± 0.771 | 29.30 ± 1.976** | 11.88 ± 1.271** | 1.675 ± 0.340 | 66.6 ± 6.195 | 11.75 ± 2.217** | |
| 0.594** | 3.245 ± 0.595 | 23.63 ± 1.186** | 13.64 ± 2.230 | 1.84 ± 0.230** | 73.40 ± 3.140** | 14.60 ± 2.074** | |
| 0.676** | 3.937 ± 0.628 | 21.17 ± 1.018** | 16.05 ± 0.354** | 2.05 ± 0.212 | 90.8 ± 3.394** | 17.00 ± 2.828** | |
| 0.568** | 3.042 ± 0.543 | 24.65 ± 1.270** | 13.03 ± 2.346 | 1.76 ± 0.251 | 65.4 ± 7.077 | 16.67 ± 1.528** | |
| Standard AA | 0.686** | 4.056 ± 0.339** | 19.19 ± 0.901** | 15.70 ± 1.098** | 2.02 ± 0.330 | 87.42.42 ± 3.129** | 18.50 ± 2.646** |
All values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 2–5); analysis of variance followed by unpaired t-test. SD = Standard deviation, CME = Crude methanol extract, CHF = Chloroform fraction, EAF = Ethyl acetate fraction, AQF = Aqueous fraction, Cd= Cadmium, AA = Ascorbic acid, SOD = Superoxide dismutase, LPO = Lipid peroxide.
*p < 0.05, significant compared with the normal group.
**p < 0.05, significant compared with Cd (negative control) group.
Effect of CME, CHF, and EAF against oxidative damage of human erythrocytes.
| Sample with dose | H2O2 induced assay (% of inhibition) | HOCl induced assay (% of inhibition) | Lipid peroxidation (% of inhibition) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 48.26 | 41.19 | 49.61 | |
| 41.77 | 30.11 | 35.05 | |
| 62.81 | 57.13 | 70.50 | |
| 86.14 | 84.37 | 91.68 |
All values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Here, SD = Standard deviation, CME = Crude methanol extract, CHF = Chloroform fraction, EAF = Ethyl acetate fraction, AQF = Aqueous fraction,.GA = Gallic acid.
Figure 2Protection of Human Erythrocyte against H2O2 (a) and HOCl (b) induced oxidative damage and lipid peroxidation (c). All values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3) SD = Standard deviation.
Figure 3DNA nicking assay. Lane-1: Untreated DNA; Lane-2: DNA + Fenton's reagent; Lane-3: DNA + Fenton's reagent + EAF (300 mg/ml); Lane-4: DNA + Fenton's reagent + EAF (250 mg/ml); Lane-5: DNA + Fenton's reagent + EAF (200 mg/ml); Lane-6: DNA + Fenton's reagent + EAF (150 mg/ml); Lane-7: DNA + Fenton's reagent + EAF (100 mg/ml); Lane-8: DNA + Fenton's reagent + Gallic Acid (100 mg/ml).