Literature DB >> 20965415

The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.

Alberto Ciccia1, Stephen J Elledge.   

Abstract

Damage to our genetic material is an ongoing threat to both our ability to faithfully transmit genetic information to our offspring as well as our own survival. To respond to these threats, eukaryotes have evolved the DNA damage response (DDR). The DDR is a complex signal transduction pathway that has the ability to sense DNA damage and transduce this information to the cell to influence cellular responses to DNA damage. Cells possess an arsenal of enzymatic tools capable of remodeling and repairing DNA; however, their activities must be tightly regulated in a temporal, spatial, and DNA lesion-appropriate fashion to optimize repair and prevent unnecessary and potentially deleterious alterations in the structure of DNA during normal cellular processes. This review will focus on how the DDR controls DNA repair and the phenotypic consequences of defects in these critical regulatory functions in mammals.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20965415      PMCID: PMC2988877          DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  240 in total

Review 1.  The FANCM family of DNA helicases/translocases.

Authors:  Matthew C Whitby
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-02-08

Review 2.  Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Moynahan; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 3.  Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Meena Shrivastav; Leyma P De Haro; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

4.  APLF (C2orf13) facilitates nonhomologous end-joining and undergoes ATM-dependent hyperphosphorylation following ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Chloe J Macrae; Richard D McCulloch; Jarkko Ylanko; Daniel Durocher; C Anne Koch
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-02-01

Review 5.  Role of yeast Rad5 and its human orthologs, HLTF and SHPRH in DNA damage tolerance.

Authors:  Ildiko Unk; Ildikó Hajdú; András Blastyák; Lajos Haracska
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-01-21

Review 6.  Human DNA damage response and repair deficiency syndromes: linking genomic instability and cell cycle checkpoint proficiency.

Authors:  Claudia Kerzendorfer; Mark O'Driscoll
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-05-26

Review 7.  How the fanconi anemia pathway guards the genome.

Authors:  George-Lucian Moldovan; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 16.830

8.  The annealing helicase HARP is recruited to DNA repair sites via an interaction with RPA.

Authors:  Timur Yusufzai; Xiangduo Kong; Kyoko Yokomori; James T Kadonaga
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) signaling network is modulated by a novel poly(ADP-ribose)-dependent pathway in the early response to DNA-damaging agents.

Authors:  Jean-François Haince; Sergei Kozlov; Valina L Dawson; Ted M Dawson; Michael J Hendzel; Martin F Lavin; Guy G Poirier
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Replication fork reversal and the maintenance of genome stability.

Authors:  John Atkinson; Peter McGlynn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1890 in total

Review 1.  The role of PARP1 in the DNA damage response and its application in tumor therapy.

Authors:  Zhifeng Wang; Fengli Wang; Tieshan Tang; Caixia Guo
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Human monocytes are severely impaired in base and DNA double-strand break repair that renders them vulnerable to oxidative stress.

Authors:  Martina Bauer; Michael Goldstein; Markus Christmann; Huong Becker; Daniel Heylmann; Bernd Kaina
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Distinct roles of FANCO/RAD51C protein in DNA damage signaling and repair: implications for Fanconi anemia and breast cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Kumar Somyajit; Shreelakshmi Subramanya; Ganesh Nagaraju
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Distinct functions of human cohesin-SA1 and cohesin-SA2 in double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Xiangduo Kong; Alexander R Ball; Hoang Xuan Pham; Weihua Zeng; Hsiao-Yuan Chen; John A Schmiesing; Jong-Soo Kim; Michael Berns; Kyoko Yokomori
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 5.  Charity begins at home: non-coding RNA functions in DNA repair.

Authors:  Dipanjan Chowdhury; Young Eun Choi; Marie Eve Brault
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  RIP1 maintains DNA integrity and cell proliferation by regulating PGC-1α-mediated mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis.

Authors:  W Chen; Q Wang; L Bai; W Chen; X Wang; C S Tellez; S Leng; M T Padilla; T Nyunoya; S A Belinsky; Y Lin
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 7.  The multifaceted functions of sirtuins in cancer.

Authors:  Angeliki Chalkiadaki; Leonard Guarente
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Induction of endocycles represses apoptosis independently of differentiation and predisposes cells to genome instability.

Authors:  Christiane Hassel; Bingqing Zhang; Michael Dixon; Brian R Calvi
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Cdc45 protein-single-stranded DNA interaction is important for stalling the helicase during replication stress.

Authors:  Irina Bruck; Daniel L Kaplan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Double duty: ZMYND8 in the DNA damage response and cancer.

Authors:  Fade Gong; Kyle M Miller
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.