Literature DB >> 3514045

High-dose morphine and methadone in cancer patients. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations of oral treatment.

J Säwe.   

Abstract

Several clinical studies have shown oral morphine and methadone to be effective in the treatment of intractable pain in patients with malignant disease. Recent pharmacokinetic studies have confirmed the rationale for regular administration of oral morphine and methadone but have revealed marked interindividual differences in the kinetics and metabolism which must be considered when titrating the oral dose according to the individual patient's need. Oral absorption of morphine in patients with malignant diseases is rapid, with peak plasma concentrations occurring at 20 to 90 minutes. Predose steady-state concentrations bear a constant relationship to dose, but vary considerably between individuals. The oral bioavailability is approximately 40% with marked patient-to-patient variations as a result of differences in presystemic elimination. The reported values for the volume of distribution range from 1.0 to 4.7 L/kg. Plasma protein binding is about 30%. The elimination half-life varies between 0.7 and 7.8 hours. Plasma clearance is approximately 19 ml/min/kg (5 to 34 ml/min/kg) and mostly accounted for by metabolic clearance. Studies in a few patients with malignant diseases treated regularly with daily doses of oral morphine ranging from 20 to 750mg indicate a linear relationship between the dose and trough concentration of morphine. Long term treatment with 10- to 20-fold increase of the oral dose over a period of 6 to 8 months does not seem to change the kinetics of oral morphine. The plasma concentrations of the main metabolite, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), exceed those of the parent drug by approximately 10-fold after intravenous administration and by 20-fold after oral administration. The relationship between the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of morphine and the AUC of morphine-3-glucuronide remains constant during the development of tolerance upon long term treatment with increasing doses. Renal disease causes a significant increase in the mean plasma concentrations of morphine for 15 minutes after its administration, while mean values of terminal half-life and total body clearance are within the normal range. However, the glucuronidated polar metabolite morphine-3-glucuronide rises rapidly to high concentrations which persist for several days. Chronic liver disease causes an increase in the bioavailability of oral morphine but no, or only a slight reduction in the intravenous clearance. The elimination half-life and volume of distribution are within the normal range.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3514045     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-198611020-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  87 in total

1.  Quantitative determination of morphine in biological samples by gas-liquid chromatography and electron-capture detection.

Authors:  B Dahlström; L Paalzow
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 3.765

2.  The diposi tion of morphine in surgical patients.

Authors:  B A Berkowitz; S H Ngai; J C Yang; J Hempstead; S Spector
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Biochemical basis for analgesic activity of morphine-6-glucuronide. I. Penetration of morphine-6-glucuronide in the brain of rats.

Authors:  H Yoshimura; S Ida; K Oguri; H Tsukamoto
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1973-06-15       Impact factor: 5.858

4.  Disposition of morphine in man.

Authors:  S Spector; E S Vesell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Influence of age on pain relief from analgesics. A study of postoperative patients.

Authors:  J W Bellville; W H Forrest; E Miller; B W Brown
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1971-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A comparison of the analgesic effects of pentazocine and morphine in patients with cancer.

Authors:  W T Beaver; S L Wallenstein; R W Houde; A Rogers
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1966 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Kinetics of morphine in patients with renal failure.

Authors:  J Säwe; J O Svensson; I Odar-Cederlöf
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-07-27       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Urinary excretion of morphine and its metabolites in morphine-dependent subjects.

Authors:  S Y Yeh
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Disposition of methadone in methadone maintenance.

Authors:  E Anggård; L M Gunne; J Homstrand; R E McMahon; C G Sandberg; H R Sullivan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Plasma concentrations following single doses of morphine sulfate in oral solution and rectal suppository.

Authors:  N M Ellison; G O Lewis
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec
View more
  30 in total

1.  Methadone use in children and young adults at a cancer center: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Doralina L Anghelescu; Lane G Faughnan; Gisele M Hankins; Deborah A Ward; Linda L Oakes
Journal:  J Opioid Manag       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct

2.  Fatal outcome with use of rectal morphine for postoperative pain control in an infant.

Authors:  G K Gourlay; R A Boas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-21

3.  Applying legal risk management to the clinical use of methadone.

Authors:  James O'Donnell; F Randy Vogenberg
Journal:  P T       Date:  2011-12

4.  Opioid tolerance development: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic perspective.

Authors:  Emily O Dumas; Gary M Pollack
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  [Not Available].

Authors:  J Jage
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease.

Authors:  I Tegeder; J Lötsch; G Geisslinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles of illicit drug use and treatment of illicit drug users.

Authors:  D I Quinn; A Wodak; R O Day
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Enterohepatic circulation of opioid drugs. Is it clinically relevant in the treatment of cancer patients?

Authors:  G W Hanks; P J Wand
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Morphine pharmacokinetics and metabolism in humans. Enterohepatic cycling and relative contribution of metabolites to active opioid concentrations.

Authors:  J Hasselström; J Säwe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  The effects of maternally administered methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone on offspring: review of human and animal data.

Authors:  W O Farid; S A Dunlop; R J Tait; G K Hulse
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.363

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.