OBJECTIVE: Saliva specimens collected in school populations may offer a more feasible, noninvasive alternative to nasal swabs for large-scale COVID-19 testing efforts in kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) schools. We investigated acceptance of saliva-based COVID-19 testing among quarantined K-12 students and their parents, teachers, and staff members who recently experienced a SARS-CoV-2 exposure in school. METHODS: We surveyed 719 participants, in person or by telephone, who agreed to or declined a free saliva-based COVID-19 reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test as part of a surveillance investigation about whether they would have consented to testing if offered a nasal swab instead. We conducted this investigation in 6 school districts in Greene County (n = 3) and St. Louis County (n = 3), Missouri, from January 25 through March 23, 2021. RESULTS: More than one-third (160 of 446) of K-12 students (or their parents or guardians), teachers, and staff members who agreed to a saliva-based COVID-19 test indicated they would have declined testing if specimen collection were by nasal swab. When stratified by school level, 51% (67 of 132) of elementary school students or their parents or guardians would not have agreed to testing if a nasal swab was offered. CONCLUSIONS: Some students, especially those in elementary school, preferred saliva-based COVID-19 testing to nasal swab testing. Use of saliva-based testing might increase voluntary participation in screening efforts in K-12 schools to help prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2.
OBJECTIVE: Saliva specimens collected in school populations may offer a more feasible, noninvasive alternative to nasal swabs for large-scale COVID-19 testing efforts in kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) schools. We investigated acceptance of saliva-based COVID-19 testing among quarantined K-12 students and their parents, teachers, and staff members who recently experienced a SARS-CoV-2 exposure in school. METHODS: We surveyed 719 participants, in person or by telephone, who agreed to or declined a free saliva-based COVID-19 reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test as part of a surveillance investigation about whether they would have consented to testing if offered a nasal swab instead. We conducted this investigation in 6 school districts in Greene County (n = 3) and St. Louis County (n = 3), Missouri, from January 25 through March 23, 2021. RESULTS: More than one-third (160 of 446) of K-12 students (or their parents or guardians), teachers, and staff members who agreed to a saliva-based COVID-19 test indicated they would have declined testing if specimen collection were by nasal swab. When stratified by school level, 51% (67 of 132) of elementary school students or their parents or guardians would not have agreed to testing if a nasal swab was offered. CONCLUSIONS: Some students, especially those in elementary school, preferred saliva-based COVID-19 testing to nasal swab testing. Use of saliva-based testing might increase voluntary participation in screening efforts in K-12 schools to help prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; K-12 schools; saliva-based testing; school health; screening
Authors: Guillaume Butler-Laporte; Alexander Lawandi; Ian Schiller; Mandy Yao; Nandini Dendukuri; Emily G McDonald; Todd C Lee Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Rebecca B Hershow; Karen Wu; Nathaniel M Lewis; Alison T Milne; Dustin Currie; Amanda R Smith; Spencer Lloyd; Brian Orleans; Erin L Young; Brandi Freeman; Noah Schwartz; Bobbi Bryant; Catherine Espinosa; Yoshinori Nakazawa; Elizabeth Garza; Olivia Almendares; Winston E Abara; Daniel C Ehlman; Keith Waters; Mary Hill; Ilene Risk; Kelly Oakeson; Jacqueline E Tate; Hannah L Kirking; Angela Dunn; Snigdha Vallabhaneni; Adam L Hersh; Victoria T Chu Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Alvin Kuo Jing Teo; Yukti Choudhury; Iain Beehuat Tan; Chae Yin Cher; Shi Hao Chew; Zi Yi Wan; Lionel Tim Ee Cheng; Lynette Lin Ean Oon; Min Han Tan; Kian Sing Chan; Li Yang Hsu Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Patrick Dawson; Mary Claire Worrell; Sara Malone; Sarah C Tinker; Stephanie Fritz; Brett Maricque; Sadaf Junaidi; Gemille Purnell; Albert M Lai; Julie A Neidich; Justin S Lee; Rachel C Orscheln; Rachel Charney; Terri Rebmann; Jon Mooney; Nancy Yoon; Machelle Petit; Spring Schmidt; Jean Grabeel; Lee Ann Neill; Lisa C Barrios; Snigdha Vallabhaneni; Randall W Williams; Clay Goddard; Jason G Newland; John C Neatherlin; Johanna S Salzer Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Nathaniel M Lewis; Rebecca B Hershow; Victoria T Chu; Karen Wu; Alison T Milne; Nathan LaCross; Mary Hill; Ilene Risk; Adam L Hersh; Hannah L Kirking; Jacqueline E Tate; Snigdha Vallabhaneni; Angela C Dunn Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2021-04-16 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: François Gagnon; Maala Bhatt; Roger Zemek; Richard J Webster; Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki; Stuart Harman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 3.752