Literature DB >> 33315584

SARS-CoV-2 Testing Service Preferences of Adults in the United States: Discrete Choice Experiment.

Rebecca Zimba1, Sarah Kulkarni1, Amanda Berry1, William You1, Chloe Mirzayi1, Drew Westmoreland1, Angela Parcesepe2,3, Levi Waldron1,4, Madhura Rane1, Shivani Kochhar1, McKaylee Robertson1, Andrew Maroko1,5, Christian Grov1,6, Denis Nash1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ascertaining preferences for SARS-CoV-2 testing and incorporating findings into the design and implementation of strategies for delivering testing services may enhance testing uptake and engagement, a prerequisite to reducing onward transmission.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine important drivers of decisions to obtain a SARS-CoV-2 test in the context of increasing community transmission.
METHODS: We used a discrete choice experiment to assess preferences for SARS-CoV-2 test type, specimen type, testing venue, and results turnaround time. Participants (n=4793) from the US national longitudinal Communities, Households and SARS-CoV-2 Epidemiology (CHASING) COVID Cohort Study completed our online survey from July 30 to September 8, 2020. We estimated the relative importance of testing method attributes and part-worth utilities of attribute levels, and simulated the uptake of an optimized testing scenario relative to the current typical testing scenario of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) via nasopharyngeal swab in a provider's office or urgent care clinic with results in >5 days.
RESULTS: Test result turnaround time had the highest relative importance (30.4%), followed by test type (28.3%), specimen type (26.2%), and venue (15.0%). In simulations, immediate or same-day test results, both PCR and serology, or oral specimens substantially increased testing uptake over the current typical testing option. Simulated uptake of a hypothetical testing scenario of PCR and serology via a saliva sample at a pharmacy with same-day results was 97.7%, compared to 0.6% for the current typical testing scenario, with 1.8% opting for no test.
CONCLUSIONS: Testing strategies that offer both PCR and serology with noninvasive methods and rapid turnaround time would likely have the most uptake and engagement among residents in communities with increasing community transmission of SARS-CoV-2. ©Rebecca Zimba, Sarah Kulkarni, Amanda Berry, William You, Chloe Mirzayi, Drew Westmoreland, Angela Parcesepe, Levi Waldron, Madhura Rane, Shivani Kochhar, McKaylee Robertson, Andrew Maroko, Christian Grov, Denis Nash. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (http://publichealth.jmir.org), 31.12.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; cohort study; discrete choice experiment; engagement; implementation science; pandemic; stated preference study; testing

Year:  2020        PMID: 33315584     DOI: 10.2196/25546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill        ISSN: 2369-2960


  9 in total

1.  Nasopharyngeal swabs vs. saliva sampling for SARS-CoV-2 detection: A cross-sectional survey of acceptability for caregivers and children after experiencing both methods.

Authors:  François Gagnon; Maala Bhatt; Roger Zemek; Richard J Webster; Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki; Stuart Harman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Acceptance of Saliva-Based Specimen Collection for SARS-CoV-2 Testing Among K-12 Students, Teachers, and Staff.

Authors:  Heather P McLaughlin; Mary Claire Worrell; Sara Malone; Patrick Dawson; Brett Maricque; Jessica L Halpin; Sooji Lee; Stephanie A Fritz; Sarah C Tinker; Julie A Neidich; Katie Towns; Justin S Lee; Lisa C Barrios; John C Neatherlin; Jason G Newland; Johanna S Salzer
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Self-Sampled Gargle Water Direct RT-LAMP as a Screening Method for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infections.

Authors:  Skaiste Arbaciauskaite; Pouya Babakhani; Natalia Sandetskaya; Dalius Vitkus; Ligita Jancoriene; Dovile Karosiene; Dovile Karciauskaite; Birute Zablockiene; Dirk Kuhlmeier
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-22

4.  The emergence, surge and subsequent wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in New York metropolitan area: The view from a major region-wide urgent care provider.

Authors:  Madhura S Rane; Angela Profeta; Emily Poehlein; Sarah Kulkarni; McKaylee Robertson; Chris Gainus; Ashish Parikh; Kerry LeBenger; Daniel Frogel; Denis Nash
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-04-12

5.  Patterns of SARS-CoV-2 Testing Preferences in a National Cohort in the United States: Latent Class Analysis of a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Rebecca Zimba; Matthew L Romo; Sarah G Kulkarni; Amanda Berry; William You; Chloe Mirzayi; Drew A Westmoreland; Angela M Parcesepe; Levi Waldron; Madhura S Rane; Shivani Kochhar; McKaylee M Robertson; Andrew R Maroko; Christian Grov; Denis Nash
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2021-12-30

6.  Comparison between Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection in an Asymptomatic Population, and Direct Confirmation by RT-PCR from the Residual Buffer.

Authors:  Glenn Patriquin; Jason J LeBlanc; Catherine Williams; Todd F Hatchette; John Ross; Lisa Barrett; Ross Davidson
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-02-16

7.  Mixed-methods process evaluation of a residence-based SARS-CoV-2 testing participation pilot on a UK university campus during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  H Blake; S Carlisle; L Fothergill; J Hassard; A Favier; J Corner; J K Ball; C Denning
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.135

8.  The hidden burden of medical testing: public views and experiences of COVID-19 testing as a social and ethical process.

Authors:  Alice Street; Shona J Lee; Imogen Bevan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.135

Review 9.  Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Related to COVID-19 Testing: A Rapid Scoping Review.

Authors:  Imogen Bevan; Mats Stage Baxter; Helen R Stagg; Alice Street
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.