Literature DB >> 27056758

A pulsatile hemodynamic evaluation of the commercially available bifurcated Y-graft Fontan modification and comparison with the lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduits.

Phillip M Trusty1, Maria Restrepo1, Kirk R Kanter2, Ajit P Yoganathan3, Mark A Fogel4, Timothy C Slesnick5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Fontan completion, resulting in a total cavopulmonary connection, is accomplished using a lateral tunnel, extracardiac conduit, or bifurcated Y-graft. The use of Y-grafts is hypothesized to provide symmetric hepatic blood flow distribution to the lungs, a factor related to pulmonary arteriovenous malformations. The present study evaluates the hemodynamic performance of the largest commercially available Y-graft cohort to date, highlights 6 representative cases, and compares commercially available Y-graft performance with lateral tunnel/extracardiac conduit connections.
METHODS: A total of 30 patients with commercially available Y-grafts and 30 patients with lateral tunnel/extracardiac conduits were analyzed. Total cavopulmonary connection anatomies and flow waveforms were reconstructed using cardiac magnetic resonance images and phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance. Computational fluid dynamic simulations were performed to quantify total cavopulmonary connection power loss, resistance, and hepatic flow distribution. Comparisons between graft types were investigated.
RESULTS: Total cavopulmonary connection resistance was significantly higher for Y-grafts. Hepatic flow distribution was similar overall but showed discrepancies at extreme values with more unbalanced flow in the Y-graft cohort. Power loss was more sensitive to left pulmonary artery stenosis in the Y-graft cohort. Prediction of Y-graft hepatic flow distribution is multifactorial.
CONCLUSIONS: Commercially available Y-grafts do not inherently provide more balanced hepatic flow distribution than lateral tunnel/extracardiac conduit connections, which are more energetically favorable and less sensitive to pulmonary artery stenosis. Graft type should be considered on an individual basis because hemodynamic performance is based on a combination of factors, including pulmonary flow distribution, pulmonary artery stenosis, and superior vena cava positioning.
Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fontan; Y-graft; hepatic flow distribution; single ventricle

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27056758     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  9 in total

1.  Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Non-Newtonian Behavior of Blood Flow in the Fontan Circulation.

Authors:  Andrew L Cheng; Niema M Pahlevan; Derek G Rinderknecht; John C Wood; Morteza Gharib
Journal:  Eur J Mech B Fluids       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.183

2.  Can time-averaged flow boundary conditions be used to meet the clinical timeline for Fontan surgical planning?

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Phillip M Trusty; Mike Tree; Christopher M Haggerty; Elaine Tang; Mark Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  The effect of respiration-driven flow waveforms on hemodynamic metrics used in Fontan surgical planning.

Authors:  Elaine Tang; Zhenglun Alan Wei; Phillip M Trusty; Kevin K Whitehead; Lucia Mirabella; Alessandro Veneziani; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Fontan Surgical Planning: Previous Accomplishments, Current Challenges, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Phillip M Trusty; Timothy C Slesnick; Zhenglun Alan Wei; Jarek Rossignac; Kirk R Kanter; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  A 4D flow MRI evaluation of the impact of shear-dependent fluid viscosity on in vitro Fontan circulation flow.

Authors:  Andrew L Cheng; Choo Phei Wee; Niema M Pahlevan; John C Wood
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  A novel Fontan Y-graft for interrupted inferior vena cava and azygos continuation.

Authors:  S Samaneh Lashkarinia; Murat Cicek; Banu Kose; Mohammad Rezaeimoghaddam; Emine Hekim Yılmaz; Numan Ali Aydemir; Reza Rasooli; Sercin Ozkok; Nurgul Yurtseven; Hasan Erdem; Kerem Pekkan; Ahmet Sasmazel
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-06-01

7.  Decreased Diastolic Ventricular Kinetic Energy in Young Patients with Fontan Circulation Demonstrated by Four-Dimensional Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Pia Sjöberg; Einar Heiberg; Pär Wingren; Jens Ramgren Johansson; Torsten Malm; Håkan Arheden; Petru Liuba; Marcus Carlsson
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Physiological Fontan Procedure.

Authors:  Antonio F Corno; Matt J Owen; Andrea Cangiani; Edward J C Hall; Aldo Rona
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 9.  State of the art of the Fontan strategy for treatment of univentricular heart disease.

Authors:  Jelle P G van der Ven; Eva van den Bosch; Ad J C C Bogers; Willem A Helbing
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-06-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.