Literature DB >> 35130153

Modeling Bias Error in 4D Flow MRI Velocity Measurements.

Sean M Rothenberger, Jiacheng Zhang, Melissa C Brindise, Susanne Schnell, Michael Markl, Pavlos P Vlachos, Vitaliy L Rayz.   

Abstract

We present a model to estimate the bias error of 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) velocity measurements. The local instantaneous bias error is defined as the difference between the expectation of the voxel's measured velocity and actual velocity at the voxel center. The model accounts for bias error introduced by the intra-voxel velocity distribution and partial volume (PV) effects. We assess the intra-voxel velocity distribution using a 3D Taylor Series expansion. PV effects and numerical errors are considered using a Richardson extrapolation. The model is applied to synthetic Womersley flow and in vitro and in vivo 4D flow MRI measurements in a cerebral aneurysm. The bias error model is valid for measurements with at least 3.75 voxels across the vessel diameter and signal-to-noise ratio greater than 5. All test cases exceeded this diameter to voxel size ratio with diameters, isotropic voxel sizes, and velocity ranging from 3-15mm, 0.5-1mm, and 0-60cm/s, respectively. The model accurately estimates the bias error in voxels not affected by PV effects. In PV voxels, the bias error is an order of magnitude higher, and the accuracy of the bias error estimation in PV voxels ranges from 67.3% to 108% relative to the actual bias error. The bias error estimated for in vivo measurements increased two-fold at systole compared to diastole in partial volume and non-partial volume voxels, suggesting the bias error varies over the cardiac cycle. This bias error model quantifies 4D flow MRI measurement accuracy and can help plan 4D flow MRI scans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35130153      PMCID: PMC9247036          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2022.3149421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   11.037


  25 in total

1.  Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters.

Authors:  A F Stalder; M F Russe; A Frydrychowicz; J Bock; J Hennig; M Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Accelerated dual-venc 4D flow MRI for neurovascular applications.

Authors:  Susanne Schnell; Sameer A Ansari; Can Wu; Julio Garcia; Ian G Murphy; Ozair A Rahman; Amir A Rahsepar; Maria Aristova; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Probabilistic 4D blood flow tracking and uncertainty estimation.

Authors:  Ola Friman; Anja Hennemuth; Andreas Harloff; Jelena Bock; Michael Markl; Heinz-Otto Peitgen
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  In vivo three-dimensional MR wall shear stress estimation in ascending aortic dilatation.

Authors:  Erik T Bieging; Alex Frydrychowicz; Andrew Wentland; Benjamin R Landgraf; Kevin M Johnson; Oliver Wieben; Christopher J François
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  A complex-difference phase-contrast technique for measurement of volume flow rates.

Authors:  J A Polzin; M T Alley; F R Korosec; T M Grist; Y Wang; C A Mistretta
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Analysis of systematic and random error in MR volumetric flow measurements.

Authors:  R L Wolf; R L Ehman; S J Riederer; P J Rossman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Three-point phase-contrast velocity measurements with increased velocity-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  A T Lee; G B Pike; N J Pelc
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  A comparison of 4D flow MRI-derived wall shear stress with computational fluid dynamics methods for intracranial aneurysms and carotid bifurcations - A review.

Authors:  Jeremy Szajer; Kevin Ho-Shon
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Multi-modality cerebral aneurysm haemodynamic analysis: in vivo 4D flow MRI, in vitro volumetric particle velocimetry and in silico computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Melissa C Brindise; Sean Rothenberger; Benjamin Dickerhoff; Susanne Schnell; Michael Markl; David Saloner; Vitaliy L Rayz; Pavlos P Vlachos
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Loic Boussel; Vitaliy Rayz; Alastair Martin; Gabriel Acevedo-Bolton; Michael T Lawton; Randall Higashida; Wade S Smith; William L Young; David Saloner
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.