| Literature DB >> 35129809 |
W Eugene Roberts1, Jonathan E Mangum2, Paul M Schneider3.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Compare pathophysiology for infectious and noninfectious demineralization disease relative to mineral maintenance, physiologic fluoride levels, and mechanical degradation. RECENTEntities:
Keywords: Biomechanics; Enamel; Fluoride; Hydroxyapatitie; Percolation; Remineralization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35129809 PMCID: PMC8930910 DOI: 10.1007/s11914-022-00722-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Osteoporos Rep ISSN: 1544-1873 Impact factor: 5.096
Fig. 1The upper aspect of the flow chart defines the etiology of demineralization as a combination of acid, biomechanics, and percolation of intercrystalline fluid. Demineralization is defined as a unique disease process. There are differential effects on the sterile bone and septic dentition compartments. Loss of mineralized tissue (osteopenia, noncarious cervical lesions, and caries) is collectively the most pandemic disease in the world (prevalence ~100%). See text for details
Fig. 2Labial (left) and cross-sectional (right) planes of a maxillary premolar show dental structures: enamel (E), dentin (D), pulp, cementum (C), dentino-enamel junction (DEJ), and cementoenamel junction (CEJ). A noncarious cervical lesion (NCCL) is depicted in both planes. The multifactorial etiology for a NCCL is (1) toothbrush abrasion, (2) dietary acid, and (3) functional flexure. The line of force for non-axial and lateral loads (dotted lines) produce surface flexure in tension and compression that results in mechanical damage at the stress riser (star) along an enamel surface or within the maximum depth of a NCCL. See text for details