Literature DB >> 11908491

A randomized trial of sodium fluoride (60 mg) +/- estrogen in postmenopausal osteoporotic vertebral fractures: increased vertebral fractures and peripheral bone loss with sodium fluoride; concurrent estrogen prevents peripheral loss, but not vertebral fractures.

D H Gutteridge1, G O Stewart, R L Prince, R I Price, R W Retallack, S S Dhaliwal, B G A Stuckey, P Drury, C E Jones, D L Faulkner, G N Kent, C I Bhagat, G C Nicholson, K Jamrozik.   

Abstract

Postmenopausal Caucasian women aged less than 80 years (n = 99) with one or more atraumatic vertebral fracture and no hip fractures, were treated by cyclical administration of enteric coated sodium fluoride (NaF) or no NaF for 27 months, with precautions to prevent excessive stimulation of bone turnover. In the first study 65 women, unexposed to estrogen (-E study), age 70.8 +/- 0.8 years (mean +/- SEM) were all treated with calcium (Ca) 1.0-1.2 g daily and ergocalciferol (D) 0.25 mg per 25 kg once weekly and were randomly assigned to cyclical NaF (6 months on, 3 months off, initial dose 60 mg/day; group F CaD, n = 34) or no NaF (group CaD, n = 31). In the second study 34 patients, age 65.5 +/- 1.2 years, on hormone replacement therapy (E) at baseline, had this standardized, and were all treated with Ca and D and similarly randomized (FE CaD, n = 17; E CaD, n = 17) (+E study). The patients were stratified according to E status and subsequently assigned randomly to +/- NaF. Seventy-five patients completed the trial. Both groups treated with NaF showed an increase in lumbar spinal density (by DXA) above baseline by 27 months: FE CaD + 16.2% and F CaD +9.3% (both p = 0.0001). In neither group CaD nor E CaD did lumbar spinal density increase. Peripheral bone loss occurred at most sites in the F CaD group at 27 months: tibia/fibula shaft -7.3% (p = 0.005); femoral shaft -7.1% (p = 0.004); distal forearm -4.0% (p=0.004); total hip -4.1% (p = 0.003); and femoral neck -3.5% (p = 0.006). No significant loss occurred in group FE CaD. Differences between the two NaF groups were greatest at the total hip at 27 months but were not significant [p < 0.05; in view of the multiple bone mineral density (BMD) sites, an alpha of 0.01 was employed to denote significance in BMD changes throughout this paper]. Using Cox's proportional hazards model, in the -E study there were significantly more patients with first fresh vertebral fractures in those treated with NaF than in those not so treated (RR = 24.2, p = 0.008, 95% CI 2.3-255). Patients developing first fresh fractures in the first 9 months were markedly different between groups: -23% of F CaD, 0 of CaD, 29% of FE CaD and 0 of E CaD. The incidence of incomplete (stress) fractures was similar in the two NaF-treated groups. Complete nonvertebral fractures did not occur in the two +E groups; there were no differences between groups F CaD and CaD. Baseline BMD (spine and femoral neck) was related to incident vertebral fractures in the control groups (no NaF), but not in the two NaF groups. Our results and a literature review indicate that fluoride salts, if used, should be at low dosage, with pretreatment and co-treatment with a bone resorption inhibitor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11908491     DOI: 10.1007/s001980200008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  12 in total

1.  Assessment of fluoride-induced changes on physicochemical and structural properties of bone and the impact of calcium on its control in rabbits.

Authors:  Subarayan Bothi Gopalakrishnan; Gopalan Viswanathan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Increasing fluoride content deteriorates rat bone mechanical properties.

Authors:  Taraneh Rezaee; Mary L Bouxsein; Lamya Karim
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Combination therapy for osteoporosis: considerations and controversy.

Authors:  Neil Binkley; Diane Krueger
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 4.  Combination therapy for osteoporosis: considerations and controversy.

Authors:  Neil Binkley; Diane Krueger
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 5.  [Absorptiometry].

Authors:  S Prevrhal
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Infrared analysis of bones in magnesium-deficient rats treated with vitamin K2.

Authors:  Masatoshi Kobayashi; Kuniko Hara; Yasuhiro Akiyama
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Fluoride inhibits the response of bone cells to mechanical loading.

Authors:  Hubertine M E Willems; Ellen G H M van den Heuvel; Seb Castelein; Joost Keverling Buisman; Antonius L J J Bronckers; Astrid D Bakker; Jenneke Klein-Nulend
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 8.  Combination/sequential therapy in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Marie-Paul Lecart; Olivier Bruyere; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 9.  Medical treatment of vertebral osteoporosis.

Authors:  K Lippuner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Effects of treatment with fluoride on bone mineral density and fracture risk--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  P Vestergaard; N R Jorgensen; P Schwarz; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.