Reliability of a new caries diagnostic system differentiating between active and inactive caries lesions.

Current scoring systems for dental caries do not consider the dynamic nature of the disease. The aims of the present study were to describe a new set of clinical caries diagnostic criteria which differentiate between active and inactive caries lesions at both the cavitated and non-cavitated levels and to evaluate the reliability of this criteria system in a population with high caries experience. Ten diagnostic codes were defined: 0 = sound; 1 = active (intact); 2 = active (surface discontinuity); 3 = active (cavity); 4 = inactive (intact); 5 = inactive (surface discontinuity); 6 = inactive (cavity); 7 = filling; 8 = filling with active caries; 9 = filling with inactive caries. Distinction between active and inactive caries lesions was made on the basis of a combination of visual and tactile criteria. The inter- and intra-examiner reliability was assessed through repeated examinations of 50 children by 2 recorders over a period of 3 years. The percentage agreement of caries diagnoses varied between 94.2 and 96.2%. The kappa values ranged between 0.74 and 0.85 for intra-examiner examinations and between 0.78 and 0.80 for inter-examiner examinations; 81.6% of all misclassifications involved non-cavitated caries lesions. Disagreement between sound surfaces and non-cavitated active or non-cavitated inactive lesions (31.3 and 31.2%, respectively) was more common than disagreement between non-cavitated active and non-cavitated inactive lesions (10. 6%). The probability of reconfirming a sound, non-cavitated active or non-cavitated inactive caries lesion - given that the surface was diagnosed as either sound, non-cavitated active or non-cavitated inactive at the first examination - was 98.0, 68.7 and 72.5%, respectively. The results show that the use of a new set of clinical caries diagnostic criteria based on activity assessment can be performed with a high reliability, even when non-cavitated diagnoses are included in the criteria system.