Literature DB >> 35122486

Effect of a three-dimensional (3D) printed kidney model on patient understanding of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedure: a preliminary study.

Young Hyo Choi1, Seung-Ju Lee1, Hee Youn Kim2.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printed anatomical models can provide cognitive anatomical information. We aimed to study the effect of a 3D printed kidney model on patient understanding of kidney anatomy and the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedure as well as the overall patient satisfaction with the model. Seven patients who underwent PCNL were enrolled in the study. Personalized 3D printed kidney models were constructed based on the patients' computed tomography images. Patients completed two questionnaires regarding their understanding and satisfaction with the use of the 3D printed kidney model before and after using the model during informed consent. The mean age of the study population was 58.0 years. Comparison of patient understanding and satisfaction between the two questionnaires showed a general trend toward better understanding and improved satisfaction with use of 3D printed kidney models. Statistically significant results were seen for understanding of kidney anatomy, stone size, procedure, and satisfaction (p values 0.046, 0.025, 0.046, and 0.046, respectively). Five of the seven patients (71.4%) answered that the model was very useful. However, none of the patients answered that the cost was appropriate. In the current study, patients showed improved understanding of the kidney anatomy and the PCNL procedure and higher satisfaction with using the 3D printed kidney model during informed consent. With further studies using larger patient numbers and decreased production cost, using 3D printed kidney models has the potential to be a useful adjunct for patient understanding during PCNL.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Anatomical model; Patient education; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35122486     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-022-01308-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  20 in total

1.  A new model with an anatomically accurate human renal collecting system for training in fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy access.

Authors:  Benjamin W Turney
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Use 3D printing technology to enhance stone free rate in single tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of staghorn stones.

Authors:  Yuyu Xu; Yaoji Yuan; Yichuan Cai; Xun Li; Shawpong Wan; Guibin Xu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yael Schenker; Alicia Fernandez; Rebecca Sudore; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 4.  Current and emerging applications of 3D printing in medicine.

Authors:  Chya-Yan Liaw; Murat Guvendiren
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 9.954

5.  Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using an Individual 3-Dimensionally Printed Surgical Guide.

Authors:  Adam Golab; Tomasz Smektala; Marcin Krolikowski; Marcin Slojewski
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Qualitative Review of Clinical Guidelines for Medical and Surgical Management of Urolithiasis: Consensus and Controversy 2020.

Authors:  Pengbo Jiang; Lillian Xie; Raphael Arada; Roshan M Patel; Jaime Landman; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  3D printing technology and its role in urological training.

Authors:  Brandon Smith; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Is there a relationship between patient satisfaction and favorable outcomes?

Authors:  Gregory D Kennedy; Sarah E Tevis; K Craig Kent
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Current Use of Three-dimensional Model Technology in Urology: A Road Map for Personalised Surgical Planning.

Authors:  Francesco Porpiglia; Daniele Amparore; Enrico Checcucci; Riccardo Autorino; Matteo Manfredi; Giada Iannizzi; Cristian Fiori
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2018-10-04

10.  Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Johanna Glaser; Sarah Nouri; Alicia Fernandez; Rebecca L Sudore; Dean Schillinger; Michele Klein-Fedyshin; Yael Schenker
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.