Literature DB >> 30293946

Current Use of Three-dimensional Model Technology in Urology: A Road Map for Personalised Surgical Planning.

Francesco Porpiglia1, Daniele Amparore2, Enrico Checcucci2, Riccardo Autorino3, Matteo Manfredi2, Giada Iannizzi2, Cristian Fiori2.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Despite the current era of "precision surgery", an unmet need for an optimal surgical planning and navigation still remains for most genitourinary malignancies. In this setting, the 3D virtual reconstruction of 2D cross-sectional imaging has been increasingly adopted to facilitate the surgeon in better understanding the surgical anatomy.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a short overview of the most recent evidences on the current applications of 3D virtual and printed reconstructions in urologic surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A non-systematic review of the literature was performed. Medline, PubMed, the Cochrane Database and Embase were screened for studies regarding the use of 3D models in urology. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: 3D reconstruction technology has been primarily implemented with the purpose of surgical planning and navigation, especially in the management of prostate and kidney cancer. Augmented reality is still in a rudimental phase, especially in the field of prostate cancer. The (poor) Literature already published suggests that the 3D virtual and printed models could be helpful for the comprehension and learning of the surgical strategy by the young urologists and, at the meantime, could enhance the quality of the dialog with the patients, giving them a direct perception of the disease and its treatment.
CONCLUSION: Notwithstanding the current limitations and the sporadic experiences available in the Literature, 3D models technology is perceived as a useful tool for the surgical planning, especially in the field of kidney and prostate cancer, physician education/training and patient counselling. PATIENT
SUMMARY: In the field of prostate and kidney cancer, the optimal surgical planning and the patient counselling seems to be improved by the use of 3D reconstruction technology based on the preoperative imaging.
Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D models; Augmented reality; HA3D; Kidney cancer; Prostate cancer; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30293946     DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Focus        ISSN: 2405-4569


  17 in total

1.  3D imaging applications for robotic urologic surgery: an ESUT YAUWP review.

Authors:  Enrico Checcucci; Daniele Amparore; Cristian Fiori; Matteo Manfredi; Morra Ivano; Michele Di Dio; Gabriel Niculescu; Federico Piramide; Giovanni Cattaneo; Pietro Piazzolla; Giovanni Enrico Cacciamani; Riccardo Autorino; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Are nephrometry scores enough to select patients really fit for nephron sparing surgery?

Authors:  Francesco Porpiglia; Daniele Amparore; Angela Pecoraro; Enrico Checcucci
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

3.  Is this the ultimate solution to fight erectile dysfunction post radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Silvia Secco; Aldo Bocciardi; Mattia Piccinelli; Antonio Galfano
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

4.  Effect of a three-dimensional (3D) printed kidney model on patient understanding of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedure: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Young Hyo Choi; Seung-Ju Lee; Hee Youn Kim
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  A systematic review of the clinical value and applications of three-dimensional virtual reconstructions in renal tumors.

Authors:  Claudia-Gabriela Moldovanu; Andrei Lebovici; Mircea Marian Buruian
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2022-01-31

Review 6.  Role of 3D printing in surgical education for robotic urology procedures.

Authors:  Ahmed E Ghazi; Brett A Teplitz
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

Review 7.  Review of the effect of 3D medical printing and virtual reality on urology training with ‘MedTRain3DModsim’ Erasmus + European Union Project

Authors:  İlkan Tatar; Emre Huri; İlker Selçuk; Young Lee Moon; Alberto Paoluzzi; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 0.973

8.  [Three dimensional nephrometry system for partial nephrectomy: Our initial exploration].

Authors:  X F Li; Y J Peng; X T Yu; S W Xiong; S D Cheng; G P Ding; K L Yang; Q Tang; Y Mi; J Y Wu; P Zhang; J X Xie; H Hao; H Wang; J X Qiu; J Yang; X S Li; L Q Zhou
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-06-18

9.  Patient Counseling Through the Pelvicalyceal-shaped Labyrinth: In Search of an Easy Understanding of the Upcoming Stone Removal: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  A Talyshinskii; B Guliev; B Komyakov; A Galfano
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.633

Review 10.  Mixed reality applications in urology: Requirements and future potential.

Authors:  Gerd Reis; Mehmet Yilmaz; Jason Rambach; Alain Pagani; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Arkadiusz Miernik; Paul Lesur; Nareg Minaskan
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.