OBJECTIVE: Patient satisfaction with the health care experience has become a top priority for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. With resources and efforts directed at patient satisfaction, we evaluated whether high patient satisfaction measured by HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) surveys correlates with favorable outcomes. METHODS: Medical centers were identified from the University HealthSystem Consortium database from 2011 to 2012. Variables included hospital characteristics, process measure compliance, and surgical outcomes. Chi-squared analysis was used to evaluate for variables associated with high patient satisfaction (defined as hospitals that scored above the 50th percentile of top box scores). RESULTS: We identified 171 hospitals with complete data. The following variables were significantly associated with high overall patient satisfaction: large hospitals, high surgical volume, and low mortality (P < 0.001). Compliance with process measures and patient safety indicators, as well as length of stay, did not correlate with overall satisfaction. The presence of complications (P = 0.491) or increased rate of readmission (P = 0.056) were not found to affect patient satisfaction. Low mortality index was consistently found to be associated with high satisfaction across 9 of 10 HCAHPS domains. CONCLUSIONS: We found that hospital size, surgical volume, and low mortality were associated with high overall patient satisfaction. However, with the exception of low mortality, favorable surgical outcomes were not consistently associated with high HCAHPS scores. With existing satisfaction surveys, we conclude that factors outside of surgical outcomes appear to influence patients' perceptions of their care.
OBJECTIVE:Patient satisfaction with the health care experience has become a top priority for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. With resources and efforts directed at patient satisfaction, we evaluated whether high patient satisfaction measured by HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) surveys correlates with favorable outcomes. METHODS: Medical centers were identified from the University HealthSystem Consortium database from 2011 to 2012. Variables included hospital characteristics, process measure compliance, and surgical outcomes. Chi-squared analysis was used to evaluate for variables associated with high patient satisfaction (defined as hospitals that scored above the 50th percentile of top box scores). RESULTS: We identified 171 hospitals with complete data. The following variables were significantly associated with high overall patient satisfaction: large hospitals, high surgical volume, and low mortality (P < 0.001). Compliance with process measures and patient safety indicators, as well as length of stay, did not correlate with overall satisfaction. The presence of complications (P = 0.491) or increased rate of readmission (P = 0.056) were not found to affect patient satisfaction. Low mortality index was consistently found to be associated with high satisfaction across 9 of 10 HCAHPS domains. CONCLUSIONS: We found that hospital size, surgical volume, and low mortality were associated with high overall patient satisfaction. However, with the exception of low mortality, favorable surgical outcomes were not consistently associated with high HCAHPS scores. With existing satisfaction surveys, we conclude that factors outside of surgical outcomes appear to influence patients' perceptions of their care.
Authors: Laura A Giordano; Marc N Elliott; Elizabeth Goldstein; William G Lehrman; Patrice A Spencer Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: William Boulding; Seth W Glickman; Matthew P Manary; Kevin A Schulman; Richard Staelin Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: David Yu Greenblatt; Sharon M Weber; Erin S O'Connor; Noelle K LoConte; Jinn-Ing Liou; Maureen A Smith Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Charles T Tuggle; Lesley S Park; Sanziana Roman; Robert Udelsman; Julie Ann Sosa Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: David Yu Greenblatt; Caprice C Greenberg; Amy J H Kind; Jeffrey A Havlena; Matthew W Mell; Matthew T Nelson; Maureen A Smith; K Craig Kent Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Marc N Elliott; Amelia M Haviland; Paul D Cleary; Alan M Zaslavsky; Donna O Farley; David J Klein; Carol A Edwards; Megan K Beckett; Nate Orr; Debra Saliba Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sarah L Goff; Kathleen M Mazor; Penelope S Pekow; Katharine O White; Aruna Priya; Tara Lagu; Haley Guhn-Knight; Lorna Murphy; Yara Youssef Budway; Peter K Lindenauer Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Joseph A Dottino; Weiguo He; Charlotte C Sun; Hui Zhao; Shuangshuang Fu; Karen H Lu; Larissa A Meyer Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Deborah R Kaye; Caroline R Richardson; Zaojun Ye; Lindsey A Herrel; Chad Ellimoottil; David C Miller Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Daniel S Tawfik; Annette Scheid; Jochen Profit; Tait Shanafelt; Mickey Trockel; Kathryn C Adair; J Bryan Sexton; John P A Ioannidis Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Rachel D Havyer; Michelle van Ryn; Patrick M Wilson; Lauren R Bangerter; Joan M Griffin Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 3.840