Literature DB >> 35119549

The effect of extended cryo-storage following vitrification on embryo competence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

S Canosa1, D Cimadomo2, A Conforti3, R Maggiulli4, A Giancani2, A Tallarita5, F Golia6, G Fabozzi2, A Vaiarelli2, G Gennarelli1, A Revelli1, F Bongioanni1, C Alviggi3, F M Ubaldi2, L Rienzi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Few studies explored whether prolonged cryo-storage after vitrification affects embryo competence and perinatal outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims at highlighting any putative impact of cryo-storage duration on cryo-survival, miscarriage, live birth and major malformations.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed), ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus and Embase databases up to June 2021. Data were combined to obtain a pooled OR, and meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Out of 1,389 screened abstracts, 22 papers were assessed for eligibility, and 5 studies were included (N = 18,047 embryos). Prolonged cryo-storage was defined as > 12 months (N = 3389 embryos). Subgroup analysis was performed for untested vitrified cleavage stage embryos (N = 1739 embryos) and for untested and euploid vitrified blastocysts (N = 13,596 and 2712 embryos, respectively).
RESULTS: Survival rate, miscarriage, live birth and major malformation rates were all similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: These data further support the safety of long-term cryo-storage of human embryos beyond 12 months. This is reassuring for good prognosis patients with surplus embryos, couples seeking a second child from supernumerary embryos and women postponing the transfer for clinical or personal reasons.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cryo-storage; Cryo-survival; Embryo; Live birth rate; Vitrification

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35119549      PMCID: PMC9050987          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02405-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.357


  51 in total

1.  Cryostorage duration does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective single-centre cohort study of vitrified-warmed blastocysts.

Authors:  Satoshi Ueno; Kazuo Uchiyama; Tomoko Kuroda; Akiko Yabuuchi; Kenji Ezoe; Tadashi Okimura; Takashi Okuno; Tamotsu Kobayashi; Keiichi Kato
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 2.  A review of best practices of rapid-cooling vitrification for oocytes and embryos: a committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  A multifactorial analysis of the pregnancy outcome in a successful embryo cryopreservation program.

Authors:  M E Schalkoff; S P Oskowitz; R D Powers
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Difference in birth weight of consecutive sibling singletons is not found in oocyte donation when comparing fresh versus frozen embryo replacements.

Authors:  Daniela Galliano; Nicolás Garrido; Vicente Serra-Serra; Antonio Pellicer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles.

Authors:  Ana Cobo; María José de los Santos; Damià Castellò; Pilar Gámiz; Pilar Campos; José Remohí
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Discarding IVF embryos: reporting on global practices.

Authors:  M Simopoulou; K Sfakianoudis; P Giannelou; A Rapani; E Maziotis; P Tsioulou; S Grigoriadis; E Simopoulos; D Mantas; M Lambropoulou; M Koutsilieris; K Pantos; J C Harper
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Successful live birth from oocytes after more than 14 years of cryopreservation.

Authors:  María Fernanda Urquiza; Inés Carretero; Paola Rita Cano Carabajal; Rodolfo Agustín Pasqualini; María Macarena Felici; Rodolfo Sergio Pasqualini; Carlos José Quintans
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Does storage time influence postthaw survival and pregnancy outcome? An analysis of 11,768 cryopreserved human embryos.

Authors:  Ryan Riggs; Jacob Mayer; Donna Dowling-Lacey; Ting-Fing Chi; Estella Jones; Sergio Oehninger
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 9.  Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.

Authors:  Laura Rienzi; Clarisa Gracia; Roberta Maggiulli; Andrew R LaBarbera; Daniel J Kaser; Filippo M Ubaldi; Sheryl Vanderpoel; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers' to authors' assessments.

Authors:  Carson Ka-Lok Lo; Dominik Mertz; Mark Loeb
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of vitrified cryopreservation duration on IVF and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Yuling Mao; Ni Tang; Yanfen Luo; Ping Yin; Lei Li
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.506

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.