Literature DB >> 29622403

Cryostorage duration does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective single-centre cohort study of vitrified-warmed blastocysts.

Satoshi Ueno1, Kazuo Uchiyama1, Tomoko Kuroda1, Akiko Yabuuchi1, Kenji Ezoe1, Tadashi Okimura1, Takashi Okuno1, Tamotsu Kobayashi1, Keiichi Kato2.   

Abstract

A retrospective cohort study of 8736 autologous single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles was conducted in a single centre to investigate the effect of cryostorage on clinical and neonatal outcomes. Cryostorage duration was classified into three groups: (A) 0-2 months (n = 4702); (B) 2-13 months (n = 2853) and (C) 13-97 months (n = 1181). Blastocysts were vitrified using the Cryotop method. No significant differences were observed in live birth rates: (A) 37.3%; (B) 34.9%; (C) (35.2%). Gestational period was significantly shorter in group C: (A) 38.7 ± 1.8; (B) 38.6 ± 1.6; (C) 38.1 ± 1.7; P < 0.05. This was clinically unimportant as the average gestational age was more than 38 weeks. No significant differences between groups were observed in birth weight: (A) 3060 ± 455 g; (B) 3052 ± 449 g; (C) 2992 ± 445 g, or congenital malformation rates: (A) 2.2%; (B) 1.9%; (C) 1.8%. The limitation of this study was that maximum storage duration was 8 years; most blastocysts were in cryostorage for much shorter periods. Long-term storage of blastocysts that are vitrified using an open device vitrification system has no negative effect on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.
Copyright © 2018 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cryostorage duration; IVF; Neonatal outcomes; Open device vitrification system; Single blastocyst transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29622403     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  5 in total

1.  Early detection of cryostorage tank failure using a weight-based monitoring system.

Authors:  Zahava P Michaelson; Sai T Bondalapati; Selma Amrane; Robert W Prosser; Daniel M Hill; Pallavi Gaur; Matt Recio; David E Travassos; Mikaela D Wolfkamp; Sasha Sadowy; Colin Thomas; Eric J Forman; Zev Williams
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  The effect of extended cryo-storage following vitrification on embryo competence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Canosa; D Cimadomo; A Conforti; R Maggiulli; A Giancani; A Tallarita; F Golia; G Fabozzi; A Vaiarelli; G Gennarelli; A Revelli; F Bongioanni; C Alviggi; F M Ubaldi; L Rienzi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.357

3.  Prolonged Cryopreservation Negatively Affects Embryo Transfer Outcomes Following the Elective Freeze-All Strategy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Xudong Zhang; Shanshan Wu; Guimin Hao; Xueqing Wu; Haiqin Ren; Yinfeng Zhang; Aimin Yang; Xingyu Bi; Lina Bai; Yunshan Zhang; Jichun Tan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  The Impact of Embryo Storage Time on Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes and the Time Limit of Vitrification: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mengge Cui; Xiyuan Dong; Shuhao Lyu; Yu Zheng; Jihui Ai
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Long-Term Storage Does Not Affect the Expression Profiles of mRNA and Long Non-Coding RNA in Vitrified-Warmed Human Embryos.

Authors:  Jingyu Li; Ling Zhu; Jin Huang; Weiwei Liu; Wei Han; Guoning Huang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.599

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.