A C Looker1, N Sarafrazi Isfahani2, B Fan3, J A Shepherd3. 1. Division of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, MD, 20782, USA. ALooker@cdc.gov. 2. Division of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, MD, 20782, USA. 3. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: This study examines demographic patterns and body size relationships in trabecular bone score and lumbar spine BMD of US adults from NHANES 2005-2008. INTRODUCTION: Limited data exist on demographic and body size relationships for trabecular bone score (TBS), a new variable derived from bone texture analysis of lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. This study compares demographic patterns and correlations with body size (body mass index (BMI), weight, waist circumference, total body fat, trunk fat, trunk lean) between TBS and lumbar spine bone mineral density (LSBMD) for adults age ≥20 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2008 with BMI in the optimal range for TBS (15-37 kg/m(2)). METHODS: LSBMD, TBS, body fat, and lean were obtained by DXA. Weight, height, and waist circumference were measured. BMI was calculated from height and weight. RESULTS: Sex differences in TBS varied by age and race/ethnicity (p sex X age interaction and p sex X race/ethnicity interaction < 0.001). In most of the nine demographic subgroups examined, TBS did not differ by sex (four subgroups) or was significantly higher in women (three subgroups). TBS differences by race/ethnicity were inconsistent in men; in women, non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) had higher TBS than non-Hispanic blacks (NHBs) or Mexican Americans (MAs) in all age groups. In contrast, LSBMD was either significantly higher in men (five subgroups) or did not differ by sex (four subgroups). Race/ethnic differences in LSBMD were consistent across age and sex (NHB > NHW > MA). All body size variables were negatively related to TBS but positively related to LSBMD. CONCLUSIONS: Demographic patterns and body size relationships differed between TBS and LSBMD.
UNLABELLED: This study examines demographic patterns and body size relationships in trabecular bone score and lumbar spine BMD of US adults from NHANES 2005-2008. INTRODUCTION: Limited data exist on demographic and body size relationships for trabecular bone score (TBS), a new variable derived from bone texture analysis of lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. This study compares demographic patterns and correlations with body size (body mass index (BMI), weight, waist circumference, total body fat, trunk fat, trunk lean) between TBS and lumbar spine bone mineral density (LSBMD) for adults age ≥20 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2008 with BMI in the optimal range for TBS (15-37 kg/m(2)). METHODS: LSBMD, TBS, body fat, and lean were obtained by DXA. Weight, height, and waist circumference were measured. BMI was calculated from height and weight. RESULTS: Sex differences in TBS varied by age and race/ethnicity (p sex X age interaction and p sex X race/ethnicity interaction < 0.001). In most of the nine demographic subgroups examined, TBS did not differ by sex (four subgroups) or was significantly higher in women (three subgroups). TBS differences by race/ethnicity were inconsistent in men; in women, non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) had higher TBS than non-Hispanic blacks (NHBs) or Mexican Americans (MAs) in all age groups. In contrast, LSBMD was either significantly higher in men (five subgroups) or did not differ by sex (four subgroups). Race/ethnic differences in LSBMD were consistent across age and sex (NHB > NHW > MA). All body size variables were negatively related to TBS but positively related to LSBMD. CONCLUSIONS: Demographic patterns and body size relationships differed between TBS and LSBMD.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cross-sectional age patterns; Gender differences; Lumbar spine bone mineral density; NHANES; Race/ethnic differences; Trabecular bone score
Authors: J Kathleen Tracy; Walter A Meyer; Mikayel Grigoryan; Bo Fan; Raymond H Flores; Harry K Genant; Charles Resnik; Marc C Hochberg Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2005-08-18 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: D K Roy; T W O'Neill; J D Finn; M Lunt; A J Silman; D Felsenberg; G Armbrecht; D Banzer; L I Benevolenskaya; A Bhalla; J Bruges Armas; J B Cannata; C Cooper; J Dequeker; M N Diaz; R Eastell; O B Yershova; B Felsch; W Gowin; S Havelka; K Hoszowski; A A Ismail; I Jajic; I Janott; O Johnell; J A Kanis; G Kragl; A Lopez Vaz; R Lorenc; G Lyritis; P Masaryk; C Matthis; T Miazgowski; C Gennari; H A P Pols; G Poor; H H Raspe; D M Reid; W Reisinger; C Scheidt-Nave; J J Stepan; C J Todd; K Weber; A D Woolf; J Reeve Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Juliet E Compston; Julie Flahive; David W Hosmer; Nelson B Watts; Ethel S Siris; Stuart Silverman; Kenneth G Saag; Christian Roux; Maurizio Rossini; Johannes Pfeilschifter; Jeri W Nieves; J Coen Netelenbos; Lyn March; Andrea Z LaCroix; Frederick H Hooven; Susan L Greenspan; Stephen H Gehlbach; Adolfo Díez-Pérez; Cyrus Cooper; Roland D Chapurlat; Steven Boonen; Frederick A Anderson; Silvano Adami; Jonathan D Adachi Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Joan F Carroll; Ana L Chiapa; Mayra Rodriquez; David R Phelps; Kathryn M Cardarelli; Jamboor K Vishwanatha; Sejong Bae; Roberto Cardarelli Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2008-01-17 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Jane A Cauley; Lisa Palermo; Molly Vogt; Kristine E Ensrud; Susan Ewing; Marc Hochberg; Michael C Nevitt; Dennis M Black Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Katherine M Flegal; John A Shepherd; Anne C Looker; Barry I Graubard; Lori G Borrud; Cynthia L Ogden; Tamara B Harris; James E Everhart; Nathaniel Schenker Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2008-12-30 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: A L Goldman; C M Donlon; N R Cook; J E Manson; J E Buring; T Copeland; C Y Yu; M S LeBoff Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: J T Schousboe; T N Vo; L Langsetmo; B C Taylor; A M Kats; A V Schwartz; D C Bauer; J A Cauley; K E Ensrud Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Jane A Cauley; Arun S Karlamangla; Kristine Ruppert; Yinjuan Lian; MeiHua Huang; Sioban Harlow; Joel S Finkelstein; Gail A Greendale Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 2.879