| Literature DB >> 35113693 |
Lei Cao1, Gintaras Deikus1, Yu Fan1, Edward A Mead1, Yimeng Kong1, Weiyi Lai2, Yizhou Zhang3, Raymund Yong3, Robert Sebra1,4,5, Hailin Wang2, Xue-Song Zhang6, Gang Fang1.
Abstract
The discovery of N6-methyldeoxyadenine (6mA) across eukaryotes led to a search for additional epigenetic mechanisms. However, some studies have highlighted confounding factors that challenge the prevalence of 6mA in eukaryotes. We developed a metagenomic method to quantitatively deconvolve 6mA events from a genomic DNA sample into species of interest, genomic regions, and sources of contamination. Applying this method, we observed high-resolution 6mA deposition in two protozoa. We found that commensal or soil bacteria explained the vast majority of 6mA in insect and plant samples. We found no evidence of high abundance of 6mA in Drosophila, Arabidopsis, or humans. Plasmids used for genetic manipulation, even those from Dam methyltransferase mutant Escherichia coli, could carry abundant 6mA, confounding the evaluation of candidate 6mA methyltransferases and demethylases. On the basis of this work, we advocate for a reassessment of 6mA in eukaryotes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35113693 PMCID: PMC9382770 DOI: 10.1126/science.abe7489
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Science ISSN: 0036-8075 Impact factor: 63.714