Maria Diaz1, Priya Singh2, Ivan S Kotchetkov1, Anna Skakodub1, Alicia Meng3, Christel Tamer3, Robert J Young3, Anne S Reiner4, Katherine S Panageas4, Lakshmi V Ramanathan5, Elena Pentsova6. 1. Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 2. Hunter College, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 5. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 6. Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. pentsove@mskcc.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Circulating tumor cells in cerebrospinal fluid are a quantitative diagnostic tool for leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors, but their prognostic significance is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate CSF-CTC quantification in predicting outcomes in LM. METHODS: This is a single institution retrospective study of patients with solid tumors who underwent CSF-CTC quantification using the CellSearch® platform between 04/2016 and 06/2019. Information on neuroaxis imaging, CSF results, and survival was collected. LM was diagnosed by MRI and/or CSF cytology. Survival analyses were performed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling, and CSF-CTC splits associated with survival were identified through recursive partitioning analysis. RESULTS: Out of 290 patients with CNS metastases, we identified a cohort of 101 patients with newly diagnosed LM. In this group, CSF-CTC count (median 200 CTCs/3 ml) predicted survival continuously (HR = 1.005, 95% CI: 1.002-1.009, p = 0.0027), and the risk of mortality doubled (HR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.45-5.56, p = 0.0023) at the optimal cutoff of ≥ 61 CSF-CTCs/3 ml. Neuroimaging findings of LM (assessed by 3 independent neuroradiologists) were associated with a higher CSF-CTC count (median CSF-CTCs range 1.5-4 for patients without radiographic LM vs 200 for patients with radiographic LM, p < 0.001), but did not predict survival. CONCLUSION: Our data shows that CSF-CTCs quantification predicts survival in newly diagnosed LM, and outperforms neuroimaging. CSF-CTC analysis can be used as a prognostic tool in patients with LM and provides quantitative assessment of disease burden in the CNS compartment.
PURPOSE: Circulating tumor cells in cerebrospinal fluid are a quantitative diagnostic tool for leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors, but their prognostic significance is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate CSF-CTC quantification in predicting outcomes in LM. METHODS: This is a single institution retrospective study of patients with solid tumors who underwent CSF-CTC quantification using the CellSearch® platform between 04/2016 and 06/2019. Information on neuroaxis imaging, CSF results, and survival was collected. LM was diagnosed by MRI and/or CSF cytology. Survival analyses were performed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling, and CSF-CTC splits associated with survival were identified through recursive partitioning analysis. RESULTS: Out of 290 patients with CNS metastases, we identified a cohort of 101 patients with newly diagnosed LM. In this group, CSF-CTC count (median 200 CTCs/3 ml) predicted survival continuously (HR = 1.005, 95% CI: 1.002-1.009, p = 0.0027), and the risk of mortality doubled (HR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.45-5.56, p = 0.0023) at the optimal cutoff of ≥ 61 CSF-CTCs/3 ml. Neuroimaging findings of LM (assessed by 3 independent neuroradiologists) were associated with a higher CSF-CTC count (median CSF-CTCs range 1.5-4 for patients without radiographic LM vs 200 for patients with radiographic LM, p < 0.001), but did not predict survival. CONCLUSION: Our data shows that CSF-CTCs quantification predicts survival in newly diagnosed LM, and outperforms neuroimaging. CSF-CTC analysis can be used as a prognostic tool in patients with LM and provides quantitative assessment of disease burden in the CNS compartment.
Authors: Emilie Le Rhun; Patrick Devos; Thomas Boulanger; Marion Smits; Dieta Brandsma; Roberta Rudà; Julia Furtner; Johann-Martin Hempel; Tjeerd J Postma; Patrick Roth; Tom J Snijders; Frank Winkler; Sebastian Winklhofer; Antonella Castellano; Elke Hattingen; Jaume Capellades; Thierry Gorlia; Martin Van den Bent; Patrick Y Wen; Martin Bendszus; Michael Weller Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Isabella C Glitza; Keiran S M Smalley; Priscilla K Brastianos; Michael A Davies; Ian McCutcheon; James K C Liu; Kamran A Ahmed; John A Arrington; Brittany R Evernden; Inna Smalley; Zeynep Eroglu; Nikhil Khushalani; Kim Margolin; Harriet Kluger; Michael B Atkins; Hussein Tawbi; Adrienne Boire; Peter Forsyth Journal: Pigment Cell Melanoma Res Date: 2020-01-19 Impact factor: 4.693
Authors: Marc Chamberlain; Larry Junck; Dieta Brandsma; Riccardo Soffietti; Roberta Rudà; Jeffrey Raizer; Willem Boogerd; Sophie Taillibert; Morris D Groves; Emilie Le Rhun; Julie Walker; Martin van den Bent; Patrick Y Wen; Kurt A Jaeckle Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Massimo Cristofanilli; G Thomas Budd; Matthew J Ellis; Alison Stopeck; Jeri Matera; M Craig Miller; James M Reuben; Gerald V Doyle; W Jeffrey Allard; Leon W M M Terstappen; Daniel F Hayes Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lakshmi Nayak; Martin Fleisher; Rita Gonzalez-Espinoza; Oscar Lin; Katherine Panageas; Anne Reiner; Chhui-Mei Liu; Lisa M Deangelis; Antonio Omuro Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 9.910