Literature DB >> 28039364

Leptomeningeal metastases: a RANO proposal for response criteria.

Marc Chamberlain1, Larry Junck2, Dieta Brandsma3, Riccardo Soffietti4, Roberta Rudà4, Jeffrey Raizer5, Willem Boogerd3, Sophie Taillibert6, Morris D Groves7, Emilie Le Rhun8, Julie Walker9, Martin van den Bent10, Patrick Y Wen11, Kurt A Jaeckle12.   

Abstract

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) currently lack standardization with respect to response assessment. A Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group with expertise in LM developed a consensus proposal for evaluating patients treated for this disease. Three basic elements in assessing response in LM are proposed: a standardized neurological examination, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) cytology or flow cytometry, and radiographic evaluation. The group recommends that all patients enrolling in clinical trials undergo CSF analysis (cytology in all cancers; flow cytometry in hematologic cancers), complete contrast-enhanced neuraxis MRI, and in instances of planned intra-CSF therapy, radioisotope CSF flow studies. In conjunction with the RANO Neurological Assessment working group, a standardized instrument was created for assessing the neurological exam in patients with LM. Considering that most lesions in LM are nonmeasurable and that assessment of neuroimaging in LM is subjective, neuroimaging is graded as stable, progressive, or improved using a novel radiological LM response scorecard. Radiographic disease progression in isolation (ie, negative CSF cytology/flow cytometry and stable neurological assessment) would be defined as LM disease progression. The RANO LM working group has proposed a method of response evaluation for patients with LM that will require further testing, validation, and likely refinement with use.
© The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSF cytology/flow cytometry; leptomeningeal metastasis; neurological examination; neuraxis MRI

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28039364      PMCID: PMC5464328          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   12.300


  59 in total

1.  The relevance of intraventricular chemotherapy for leptomeningeal metastasis in breast cancer: a randomised study.

Authors:  W Boogerd; M J van den Bent; P J Koehler; J J Heimans; J J van der Sande; N K Aaronson; A A M Hart; J Benraadt; Ch J Vecht
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Detection of malignant haematopoietic cells in the cerebrospinal fluid by conventional cytology and flow cytometry.

Authors:  Holger Nückel; Jürgen R Novotny; Richard Noppeney; Irini Savidou; Ulrich Dührsen
Journal:  Clin Lab Haematol       Date:  2006-02

3.  Flow cytometric immunophenotyping of cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  Jaco Kraan; Jan W Gratama; Corinne Haioun; Alberto Orfao; Anne Plonquet; Anna Porwit; Sandra Quijano; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson; Dolores Subira; Wyndham Wilson
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cytom       Date:  2008-07

4.  A standardized protocol for flow cytometric analysis of cells isolated from cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  R Dux; A Kindler-Röhrborn; M Annas; P Faustmann; K Lennartz; C W Zimmermann
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.181

Review 5.  Leptomeningeal metastasis: a Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology critical review of endpoints and response criteria of published randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Marc Chamberlain; Riccardo Soffietti; Jeffrey Raizer; Roberta Rudà; Dieta Brandsma; Willem Boogerd; Sophie Taillibert; Morris D Groves; Emilie Le Rhun; Larry Junck; Martin van den Bent; Patrick Y Wen; Kurt A Jaeckle
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  MR imaging of leptomeningeal metastases: comparison of three sequences.

Authors:  Sanjay K Singh; Norman E Leeds; Lawrence E Ginsberg
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Diagnostic and prognostic significance of flow cytometry immunophenotyping in patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  D Subirá; M Simó; J Illán; C Serrano; S Castañón; R Gonzalo; J J Granizo; M Martínez-García; M Navarro; J Pardo; J Bruna
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.150

8.  A prospective randomized trial of single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in meningeal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  R N Hitchins; D R Bell; R L Woods; J A Levi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Final results of a multicenter trial addressing role of CSF flow cytometric analysis in NHL patients at high risk for CNS dissemination.

Authors:  Giulia Benevolo; Alessandra Stacchini; Michele Spina; Andrés J M Ferreri; Marcella Arras; Laura Bellio; Barbara Botto; Pietro Bulian; Maria Cantonetti; Lorella Depaoli; Nicola Di Renzo; Alice Di Rocco; Andrea Evangelista; Silvia Franceschetti; Laura Godio; Francesco Mannelli; Vincenzo Pavone; Pietro Pioltelli; Umberto Vitolo; Enrico M Pogliani
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Net clinical benefit analysis of radiation therapy oncology group 0525: a phase III trial comparing conventional adjuvant temozolomide with dose-intensive temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Terri S Armstrong; Jeffrey S Wefel; Meihua Wang; Mark R Gilbert; Minhee Won; Andrew Bottomley; Tito R Mendoza; Corneel Coens; Maria Werner-Wasik; David G Brachman; Ali K Choucair; Minesh Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  72 in total

Review 1.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Central Nervous System Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Kevin Becker; Benjamin P Levy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-04-12

Review 2.  Brain metastases: neuroimaging.

Authors:  Whitney B Pope
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

3.  The RANO Leptomeningeal Metastasis Group proposal to assess response to treatment: lack of feasibility and clinical utility and a revised proposal.

Authors:  Emilie Le Rhun; Patrick Devos; Thomas Boulanger; Marion Smits; Dieta Brandsma; Roberta Rudà; Julia Furtner; Johann-Martin Hempel; Tjeerd J Postma; Patrick Roth; Tom J Snijders; Frank Winkler; Sebastian Winklhofer; Antonella Castellano; Elke Hattingen; Jaume Capellades; Thierry Gorlia; Martin Van den Bent; Patrick Y Wen; Martin Bendszus; Michael Weller
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Proteomic Analysis of CSF from Patients with Leptomeningeal Melanoma Metastases Identifies Signatures Associated with Disease Progression and Therapeutic Resistance.

Authors:  Inna Smalley; Vincent Law; Clayton Wyatt; Brittany Evernden; Bin Fang; John M Koomen; Eric A Welsh; Robert J B Macaulay; Peter A Forsyth; Keiran S M Smalley
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Contrast-enhanced modified 3D T1-weighted TSE black-blood imaging can improve detection of infectious and neoplastic meningitis.

Authors:  Nora Navina Sommer; Romina Pons Lucas; Eva Coppenrath; Hendrik Kooijman; Franziska Galiè; Nina Hesse; Wieland H Sommer; Karla M Treitl; Tobias Saam; Matthias F Froelich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Leptomeningeal Metastases.

Authors:  Jerome J Graber; Santosh Kesari
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-01-23

7.  A rare magnetic resonance imaging pattern of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: a case description.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Yu Zhang; Yi Li; Hui Bu; Zhaohua Meng; Yingxiao Ji; Jiang Wu; Yueli Zou; Xinxin Chen; Junying He; Kun Hong
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-07

8.  Leptomeningeal metastases: how best to assess response.

Authors:  Marc C Chamberlain
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 9.  Breast leptomeningeal disease: a review of current practices and updates on management.

Authors:  Nicholas B Figura; Victoria T Rizk; Avan J Armaghani; John A Arrington; Arnold B Etame; Hyo S Han; Brian J Czerniecki; Peter A Forsyth; Kamran A Ahmed
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Novel methods to diagnose leptomeningeal metastases in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lindsay Angus; John W M Martens; Martin J van den Bent; Peter A E Sillevis Smitt; Stefan Sleijfer; Agnes Jager
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.