Qiaochu Xue1, Xiang Li1, Hao Ma1, Zhou Tao1, Yoriko Heianza1, Jennifer C Rood2, George A Bray2, Frank M Sacks3, Lu Qi1,3. 1. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. 2. Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA. 3. Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: To examine whether changes in objectively measured physical activity (PA) are associated with weight loss and changes in body composition and fat distribution in response to weight-loss diet interventions. METHODS: This study included 535 participants with overweight/ obesity, who were randomly assigned to four weight-loss diets varying in macronutrients. PA was measured objectively with pedometers, and body composition and fat distribution were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography scans at baseline, 6 months and 24 months. RESULTS: From baseline to 6 months, when the maximum weight loss was achieved, each 1000-steps/d increment in PA was associated with a greater reduction in body weight (β[SE] = -0.48[0.11]) and waist circumference (β[SE] = -0.49[0.12]). Similar inverse associations were found in changes in body composition and fat distribution (P < 0.05 and false discovery rate qvalue < 0.1 for all). The trajectory of the above adiposity measures across the 24-month intervention period differed between the patterns of PA change. Participants with the largest increase in PA maintained their weight loss from 6 months to 24 months, while those with a smaller increase in PA regained their weight. In addition, dietary fat or protein intake significantly modified the associations between changes in PA and changes in body weight and waist circumference over 24 months (P∆PA*diet < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in objectively measured PA were inversely related to changes in body weight, body composition and fat distribution in response to weight-loss diets, and such associations were more evident in people on a high-fat or average-protein diet compared with a low-fat or high-protein diet.
AIMS: To examine whether changes in objectively measured physical activity (PA) are associated with weight loss and changes in body composition and fat distribution in response to weight-loss diet interventions. METHODS: This study included 535 participants with overweight/ obesity, who were randomly assigned to four weight-loss diets varying in macronutrients. PA was measured objectively with pedometers, and body composition and fat distribution were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography scans at baseline, 6 months and 24 months. RESULTS: From baseline to 6 months, when the maximum weight loss was achieved, each 1000-steps/d increment in PA was associated with a greater reduction in body weight (β[SE] = -0.48[0.11]) and waist circumference (β[SE] = -0.49[0.12]). Similar inverse associations were found in changes in body composition and fat distribution (P < 0.05 and false discovery rate qvalue < 0.1 for all). The trajectory of the above adiposity measures across the 24-month intervention period differed between the patterns of PA change. Participants with the largest increase in PA maintained their weight loss from 6 months to 24 months, while those with a smaller increase in PA regained their weight. In addition, dietary fat or protein intake significantly modified the associations between changes in PA and changes in body weight and waist circumference over 24 months (P∆PA*diet < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in objectively measured PA were inversely related to changes in body weight, body composition and fat distribution in response to weight-loss diets, and such associations were more evident in people on a high-fat or average-protein diet compared with a low-fat or high-protein diet.
Authors: Damon L Swift; Joshua E McGee; Conrad P Earnest; Erica Carlisle; Madison Nygard; Neil M Johannsen Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 8.194
Authors: Tuo Deng; Christopher J Lyon; Stephen Bergin; Michael A Caligiuri; Willa A Hsueh Journal: Annu Rev Pathol Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 23.472
Authors: Rena R Wing; Deborah F Tate; Mark A Espeland; Cora E Lewis; Jessica Gokee LaRose; Amy A Gorin; Judy Bahnson; Letitia H Perdue; Karen E Hatley; Erica Ferguson; Katelyn R Garcia; Wei Lang Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Donald K Layman; Ellen M Evans; Donna Erickson; Jennifer Seyler; Judy Weber; Deborah Bagshaw; Amy Griel; Tricia Psota; Penny Kris-Etherton Journal: J Nutr Date: 2009-01-21 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Adrian D Elliott; Dominik Linz; Ricardo Mishima; Kadhim Kadhim; Celine Gallagher; Melissa E Middeldorp; Christian V Verdicchio; Jeroen M L Hendriks; Dennis H Lau; Andre La Gerche; Prashanthan Sanders Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Tiina Savikangas; Anna Tirkkonen; Markku Alen; Taina Rantanen; Roger A Fielding; Timo Rantalainen; Sarianna Sipilä Journal: Eur Rev Aging Phys Act Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 3.878