Rena R Wing1, Deborah F Tate2, Mark A Espeland3, Cora E Lewis4, Jessica Gokee LaRose5, Amy A Gorin6, Judy Bahnson3, Letitia H Perdue3, Karen E Hatley2, Erica Ferguson1, Katelyn R Garcia3, Wei Lang3. 1. Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island. 2. University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill. 3. Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham. 5. Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond. 6. Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storr.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Weight gain occurs commonly in young adults and has adverse effects on health. OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 self-regulation interventions vs control in reducing weight gain in young adults over a mean follow-up of 3 years. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial in 2 academic settings of 599 participants aged 18 to 35 years with body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 21.0 to 30.0, recruited via mailings and emails from August 2010 to February 2012. Data were analyzed from January 2015 to January 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to control, self-regulation plus small changes, or self-regulation plus large changes. Both interventions focused on frequent self-weighing to cue behavior changes. "Small changes" taught participants to reduce intake and increase activity, both by approximately 100 calories per day. "Large changes" focused on losing 2.3 to 4.5 kg initially to buffer against expected weight gain. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Changes in weight from baseline over mean follow-up of 3 years. Secondary outcomes included proportion gaining at least 0.45 kg from baseline, proportion developing obesity (BMI, ≥30.0), and weight change baseline to 2 years. RESULTS: Among the 599 participants (22% men; 27% minority; mean [SD] age, 27.7 [4.4] years; mean [SD] BMI, 25.4 [2.6]), mean (SE) weight changes over a mean follow-up of 3 years were 0.26 (0.22), -0.56 (0.22), and -2.37 (0.22) kg in the control, small-changes, and large-changes groups, respectively (P < .001). Differences among all 3 groups were significant (large changes vs control, P < .001; small changes vs control, P = .02; large changes vs small changes, P < .001). On secondary outcomes, both interventions significantly reduced incidence of obesity relative to control (mean [SE], 8.6% [2.0%], 7.9% [2.0%], and 16.9% [2.7%] in the large-changes, small-changes, and control groups, respectively; P = .02 for large changes vs control and P = .002 for small changes vs control); a smaller percentage of participants in the large-changes group gained 0.45 kg or more (mean [SE], 23.6% [2.8%], 32.5% [3.8%], and 40.8% [4.4%], respectively; P < .001 vs control and P = .02 vs small changes) and weight change from baseline to 2 years was greater in control than in small or large changes (mean [SE], 0.54 [0.33], -0.77 [0.33], and -1.50 [0.34] kg, respectively; P = .02 vs small changes and P < .001 vs large changes). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Self-regulation with large or small changes both reduced weight gain in young adults over 3 years relative to control, but the large-changes intervention was more effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01183689.
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: Weight gain occurs commonly in young adults and has adverse effects on health. OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 self-regulation interventions vs control in reducing weight gain in young adults over a mean follow-up of 3 years. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial in 2 academic settings of 599 participants aged 18 to 35 years with body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 21.0 to 30.0, recruited via mailings and emails from August 2010 to February 2012. Data were analyzed from January 2015 to January 2016. INTERVENTIONS:Participants were randomized to control, self-regulation plus small changes, or self-regulation plus large changes. Both interventions focused on frequent self-weighing to cue behavior changes. "Small changes" taught participants to reduce intake and increase activity, both by approximately 100 calories per day. "Large changes" focused on losing 2.3 to 4.5 kg initially to buffer against expected weight gain. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Changes in weight from baseline over mean follow-up of 3 years. Secondary outcomes included proportion gaining at least 0.45 kg from baseline, proportion developing obesity (BMI, ≥30.0), and weight change baseline to 2 years. RESULTS: Among the 599 participants (22% men; 27% minority; mean [SD] age, 27.7 [4.4] years; mean [SD] BMI, 25.4 [2.6]), mean (SE) weight changes over a mean follow-up of 3 years were 0.26 (0.22), -0.56 (0.22), and -2.37 (0.22) kg in the control, small-changes, and large-changes groups, respectively (P < .001). Differences among all 3 groups were significant (large changes vs control, P < .001; small changes vs control, P = .02; large changes vs small changes, P < .001). On secondary outcomes, both interventions significantly reduced incidence of obesity relative to control (mean [SE], 8.6% [2.0%], 7.9% [2.0%], and 16.9% [2.7%] in the large-changes, small-changes, and control groups, respectively; P = .02 for large changes vs control and P = .002 for small changes vs control); a smaller percentage of participants in the large-changes group gained 0.45 kg or more (mean [SE], 23.6% [2.8%], 32.5% [3.8%], and 40.8% [4.4%], respectively; P < .001 vs control and P = .02 vs small changes) and weight change from baseline to 2 years was greater in control than in small or large changes (mean [SE], 0.54 [0.33], -0.77 [0.33], and -1.50 [0.34] kg, respectively; P = .02 vs small changes and P < .001 vs large changes). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Self-regulation with large or small changes both reduced weight gain in young adults over 3 years relative to control, but the large-changes intervention was more effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01183689.
Authors: Kenneth F Adams; Michael F Leitzmann; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Demetrius Albanes; Tamara B Harris; Albert Hollenbeck; Victor Kipnis Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Leslie A Lytle; Laura P Svetkey; Kevin Patrick; Steven H Belle; I Diana Fernandez; John M Jakicic; Karen C Johnson; Christine M Olson; Deborah F Tate; Rena Wing; Catherine M Loria Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Victoria L Stevens; Eric J Jacobs; Alpa V Patel; Juzhong Sun; Susan M Gapstur; Marjorie L McCullough Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2014-01-01 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Susan J Rodearmel; Holly R Wyatt; Mary J Barry; Fang Dong; Dongmei Pan; Richard G Israel; Susan S Cho; Michael I McBurney; James O Hill Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Michele D Levine; Mary Lou Klem; Melissa A Kalarchian; Rena R Wing; Lisa Weissfeld; Li Qin; Marsha D Marcus Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Laura P Svetkey; Victor J Stevens; Phillip J Brantley; Lawrence J Appel; Jack F Hollis; Catherine M Loria; William M Vollmer; Christina M Gullion; Kristine Funk; Patti Smith; Carmen Samuel-Hodge; Valerie Myers; Lillian F Lien; Daniel Laferriere; Betty Kennedy; Gerald J Jerome; Fran Heinith; David W Harsha; Pamela Evans; Thomas P Erlinger; Arline T Dalcin; Janelle Coughlin; Jeanne Charleston; Catherine M Champagne; Alan Bauck; Jamy D Ard; Kathleen Aicher Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Susan J Rodearmel; Holly R Wyatt; Nanette Stroebele; Sheila M Smith; Lorraine G Ogden; James O Hill Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: KayLoni L Olson; Rebecca H Neiberg; Deborah F Tate; Katelyn R Garcia; Amy A Gorin; Cora E Lewis; Jessica Unick; Rena R Wing Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Heather M Johnson; Lisa Sullivan-Vedder; KyungMann Kim; Patrick E McBride; Maureen A Smith; Jamie N LaMantia; Jennifer T Fink; Megan R Knutson Sinaise; Laura M Zeller; Diane R Lauver Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Francisco I Salgado García; Karen J Derefinko; Zoran Bursac; Robert C Klesges; Jon O Ebbert; Catherine R Womack; Rebecca A Krukowski Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Jessica Gokee LaRose; Deborah F Tate; Autumn Lanoye; Joseph L Fava; Elissa Jelalian; Megan Blumenthal; Laura J Caccavale; Rena R Wing Journal: J Health Psychol Date: 2017-01-29
Authors: J M McCaffery; J M Ordovas; G S Huggins; C-Q Lai; M A Espeland; D F Tate; R R Wing Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 4.222