| Literature DB >> 35106389 |
Anu Rahal1, D K Sharma1, Ashok Kumar1, Nitika Sharma1, Deen Dayal1.
Abstract
Haemonchus contortus is a major constraint in the development of small ruminant subsector due to significant production losses incurred by it. The present study explores the antiparasitic potential of three anthelmintic plants (Butea monosperma, Vitex negundo and Catharanthus roseus (L.) G.Don) against H. contortus taking albendazole as the standard. In silico molecular docking and pharmacokinetic prediction studies were conducted with known bioactive molecules of these plants (palasonin, vinblastine, vincristine, betulinic acid and ursolic acid) against Glutamate Dehydrogenase (GDH) and tubulin molecules of the parasite. Methanolic extracts of these herbs were fractionated (hexane, ethyl acetate, chloroform and methanol) and used in in vitro larvicidal studies. Based on the in vitro data, two herbal prototypes were developed and clinically tested. All the 5 ligand molecules showed better binding affnity for GDH and tubulin protein as compared with albendazole and shared similar binding site in the core of the GDH hexamer with slight variations. Albendazole approximately stacked against GLY190A residue, showing hydrophobic interactions with PRO157A and a Pi-cation electrostatic interaction with ARG390 along with four hydrogen bonds. Vincristine formed 2 pi-anionic electrostatic bonds with ASP158 of B and C subunits alongwith hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interaction and an additional pi-anion electrostatic interaction at ASP158A for vinblastine. Albendazole bound to α-tubulin next to colchicine site whereas vinblastine is bound at the nearby laulimalide/peloruside site of the dimer. Betulinic acid showed lateral interaction between the H2-H3 loop of one alpha subunit and H10 of the adjacent alpha subunit of two tubulin dimers. Ursolic acid and palasonin bound at the intradimer N site of microtubulin involving the H1-H7 and H1-H2 zone, respectively. The in vitro studies demonstrated good dose dependent anthelmintic potential. Both the prototypes were quite efficacious in clearing the infection, keeping it to a minimal for more than 5 months, probably, through direct anthelmintic effect through GDH, tubulin depolymerization and uncoupling as well as indirectly through immunomodulation along with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.Entities:
Keywords: Betulinic acid; Butea monosperma (Lam.) Kuntze; Catharanthus roseus; Haemonchus contortus; Palasonin; Ursolic acid; Vinblastine; Vincristine; Vitex negundo Linn.
Year: 2022 PMID: 35106389 PMCID: PMC8789534 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08789
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Phytochemical constituents in methanolic crude extracts of selected plant materials.
| plants | Anthraquinone | Alkoaloid | Glucoside | Flavonoids | Phenol | Tannin | Reducing sugar | Saponins | Protein | Terpenoid | Nitric and | Volatile oil |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ++++ | ++ | - | ++++ | - | ++ | +++ | + | - | - | ++ | + | |
| + | + | - | ++++ | ++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | - | +++ | + | _ | |
| BM | +++ | - | - | - | - | ++ | - | + | - | - | - | + |
Docking scores of different phytochemicals for H. contortus proteins.
| Serial No. | Plant | Ligand | Affinity/Free energy (Kcal/mol) | Hydrogen bonds | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibiotics/Phytochemicals | B-tubulin | GDH | B-tubulin | GDH | ||
| 1 | - | Albendazole | -5.9 | -6.7 | ASP161D, ARG103C | ARG390A: |
| 2 | Vincristine | -7.5 | -8.3 | THR78L, ILE76L, GLY79L, THR223L, ASN18L, GLU22L, ASN226L, | TYR188A, TYR188C, ARG390A, SER388C, SER388B, ASP158C, ASP158A, TYR188B, TYR188C | |
| 3 | Vinblastine | -7.3 | -8.8 | GLU328D, ARG324D, GLN329D, GLY126N, ALA287D, ASP128N, GLU2N, CYS127N, ASP48N, ASN52N, GLU53N, THR285D, VAL286D | TYR188A, ARG390A, ARG390B, SER388A, SER388B, SER388C, ASP158C, ASP158A, | |
| 4 | Betulinic acid | -7.9 | -7.6 | ASN214M, ARG121C, GLU88C, LEU284M, ARG119C, SER287M, ASP288M, GLU282M, ARG122C, SER292M, GLU295M, ASN291M, LYS336M | TYR188A, ASP158A, SER388C, SER388B | |
| 5 | Ursolic acid | -8.0 | -8.3 | THR223L, TYR222L, GLY79L, GLU22L, ALA19L, TYR222L, ASN18L, | TYR188B, TYR188C, GLY190C, ARG390C, SER388C, SER388B, | |
| 6 | Palasonin | -7.8 | -8.0 | TYR81L, THR80L, GLN31L, PRO37L, SER40L, GLY29L, LEU26L, CYS25L, GLU22L, ILE30L, PRO362L, PRO32L | ARG390C, TYR188B, TYR188C, SER388A, SER388C, ASP158A | |
Figure 1Docking of haemonchus proteins with different phytochemicals.
Pharmacokinetic profile of different phytochemicals as calculated using DruLiTo software.
| Phytochemicals | MW | logp | Alogp | HBA | HBD | TPSA | AMR | nRB | nAtom | nAcidicGroup | RC | nRigidB | SAlerts | nAromRing | nHB | Lipinskies Rule of Five | Ghose_Filter | CMC-50 Like Rule | Vebers Rule | MDDR Like Rule | BBB Likeness Rule | Unweighted QED | Weighted QED |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| palasonin | 182.06 | -0.318 | -0.918 | 4 | 0 | 52.6 | 37.22 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 4 | ✔ | × | ✔ | ✔ | x | ✔ | x | x |
| betulinic | 456.36 | 9.407 | 2.35 | 3 | 2 | 57.53 | 131.75 | 2 | 81 | 1 | 5 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 5 | x | x | x | ✔ | x | x | ✔ | x |
| ursolic | 498.37 | 9.694 | 1.863 | 4 | 1 | 63.6 | 141.41 | 3 | 86 | 1 | 5 | 37 | 3 | 0 | 5 | x | x | x | ✔ | x | x | ✔ | x |
| vinblastine | 810.42 | 3.056 | -1.25 | 13 | 3 | 150.34 | 227.52 | 10 | 117 | 0 | 9 | 57 | 5 | 3 | 16 | x | x | x | x | ✔ | x | x | x |
| vincristine | 824.4 | 1.887 | -2.07 | 14 | 3 | 167.41 | 227.72 | 11 | 116 | 0 | 9 | 57 | 6 | 3 | 17 | x | x | x | x | ✔ | x | x | x |
MW-molecular weight, logP- octanol–water partition coefficient, Alogp- Ghose-Crippen-Viswanadhan octanol-water partition coefficient, HBA-hydrogen bond acceptor, HBD-hydrogen bond donor, TPSA-topological polar surface area, AMR- Atom Molar Refractivity, nRB- number of Rotatable Bonds, nAtom-number of atoms, nAcidicGroup-number of acidic groups, RC- rotatable bond count, nRigidB- number of rigid bond, nAtomRing: number of Atom Ring, nHB: number of Hydrogen Bond, SAlerts:Structure alerts.
CMC Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry, MDDR-modern drug data report, BBB – blood brain barrier, QED- Quantitative Estimate of Drug-likeness.
Mean Per cent Larvae mortality achieved after exposure to different concentrations of plant extracts individually.
| Extract | Concentration (mg/ml) | 1st h post treatment | 2nd h post treatment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hexane | Ethyl acetate | chloroform | methanol | hexane | Ethyl acetate | chloroform | methanol | ||
| VR | 25 | 80 | 70 | 75 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 12.5 | 65 | 70 | 60 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| 6.25 | 65 | 40 | 45 | 60 | 85 | 75 | 85 | 90 | |
| 3.125 | 45 | 30 | 20 | 45 | 65 | 50 | 40 | 40 | |
| VN | 25 | 60 | 70 | 90 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 12.5 | 45 | 20 | 85 | 65 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| 6.25 | 30 | 15 | 85 | 50 | 80 | 80 | 90 | 75 | |
| 3.125 | 10 | 5 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 65 | 80 | 65 | |
| BM | 25 | 75 | 85 | 65 | 70 | 90 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 12.5 | 50 | 75 | 40 | 60 | 65 | 75 | 100 | 100 | |
| 6.25 | 35 | 60 | 25 | 35 | 50 | 75 | 85 | 95 | |
| 3.125 | 20 | 20 | 5 | 35 | 30 | 55 | 65 | 70 | |
Mean Per cent Larvae mortality (in duplicate) achieved after exposure to different plant extracts in 1 % concentrations (100μl) individually and in combination.
| Extract | 1 h | 2 h | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BM | chloroform | Chloroform + methanol | methanol | chloroform | Chloroform + methanol | methanol |
| 20 | 35 | 55 | 30 | 50 | 60 | |
| 15 | 40 | 75 | 25 | 55 | 85 | |
| VR | hexane | Hexane + ethyl acetate | ethyl ac | hexane | Hexane + ethyl acetate | ethyl ac |
| 70 | 40 | 35 | 75 | 60 | 60 | |
| 65 | 45 | 40 | 85 | 50 | 50 | |
| VN | chloroform | Chloroform + methanol | methanol | chloroform | Chloroform + methanol | methanol |
| 10 | 60 | 45 | 20 | 70 | 50 | |
| 15 | 55 | 40 | 30 | 75 | 55 | |
Per cent Larvae mortality achieved after 2 h exposure to 1% concentrations of plant extracts individually and in combination.
| Extract | BM methanol (50μl) | VR hexane (50μl) | VN chlor (50μl) | VN methanol (50μl) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BM methanol (50μl) | 45 | 70 | 60 | 55 |
| VR hexane (50μl) | 55 | 70 | 65 | 100 |
| VN chlor (50μl) | 45 | 65 | 60 | 75 |
| VN methanol (50μl) | 65 | 55 | 65 | 75 |
Synergistic studies for best effective dose combination determination on basis of mortality percentage using Brine Shrimp Lethality Assay.
| hrs post treatment | Volume | VN ethyl ac | BM ethyl ac | control | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75 μl | 50 μl | 25 μl | 75 μl | 50 μl | ||||
| VR ethyl ac | 1 h | 25 μl | 30 | 22.5 | 10 | 10 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 50 μl | 22.5 | 10 | 7.5 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 | ||
| 24 h | 25 μl | 85 | 47.5 | 37.5 | 42.5 | 47.5 | 0 | |
| 50 μl | 92.5 | 42.5 | 32.5 | 82.5 | 80 | 0 | ||
Post treatment egg count per gram faeces observed in field Haemonchus infected goats after drenching two doses of prototypeon consecutive days.
| Treatment group | Days post treatment | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 30 | 60 | 100 | 150 | |
| albendazole | 3100.00 | 500.00 | 400.00 | 850.00 | 1350.00 | 1375.00 | 1250.00 | 1225.00 |
| pot permagnate | 1800.00 | 1750.00 | 1300.00 | 1275.00 | 1100.00 | 1225.00 | 900.00 | 800.00 |
| I | 1750.00 | 1450.00 | 1450.00 | 1075.00 | 250.00 | 175.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| II | 2250.00 | 1200.00 | 900.00 | 550.00 | 700.00 | 150.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Figure 2Total hemonchus egg count per gram of goat faeces with respect to days post treatment with CIRG-A1 and CIRG A2.