Literature DB >> 35087192

Deep neural network models of sound localization reveal how perception is adapted to real-world environments.

Andrew Francl1,2,3, Josh H McDermott4,5,6,7.   

Abstract

Mammals localize sounds using information from their two ears. Localization in real-world conditions is challenging, as echoes provide erroneous information and noises mask parts of target sounds. To better understand real-world localization, we equipped a deep neural network with human ears and trained it to localize sounds in a virtual environment. The resulting model localized accurately in realistic conditions with noise and reverberation. In simulated experiments, the model exhibited many features of human spatial hearing: sensitivity to monaural spectral cues and interaural time and level differences, integration across frequency, biases for sound onsets and limits on localization of concurrent sources. But when trained in unnatural environments without reverberation, noise or natural sounds, these performance characteristics deviated from those of humans. The results show how biological hearing is adapted to the challenges of real-world environments and illustrate how artificial neural networks can reveal the real-world constraints that shape perception.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35087192      PMCID: PMC8830739          DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01244-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  45 in total

1.  Evaluating auditory performance limits: i. one-parameter discrimination using a computational model for the auditory nerve.

Authors:  M G Heinz; H S Colburn; L H Carney
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts.

Authors:  Yair Weiss; Eero P Simoncelli; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Tilt aftereffect and adaptation-induced changes in orientation tuning in visual cortex.

Authors:  Dezhe Z Jin; Valentin Dragoi; Mriganka Sur; H Sebastian Seung
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Image-Computable Ideal Observers for Tasks with Natural Stimuli.

Authors:  Johannes Burge
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 6.422

7.  Pitch as a medium: a new approach to psychophysical scaling.

Authors:  F Attneave; R K Olson
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1971-06

Review 8.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth.

Authors:  M S Livingstone; D H Hubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Cardinal rules: visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics.

Authors:  Ahna R Girshick; Michael S Landy; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Universal and Non-universal Features of Musical Pitch Perception Revealed by Singing.

Authors:  Nori Jacoby; Eduardo A Undurraga; Malinda J McPherson; Joaquín Valdés; Tomás Ossandón; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 10.900

View more
  1 in total

1.  Computational bioacoustics with deep learning: a review and roadmap.

Authors:  Dan Stowell
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.984

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.