| Literature DB >> 35083577 |
Philippe Colson1,2, Jacques Fantini3, Nouara Yahi3, Jeremy Delerce4, Anthony Levasseur4,5, Pierre-Edouard Fournier4,5, Jean-Christophe Lagier4,5, Didier Raoult4,5, Bernard La Scola4,5.
Abstract
We detected SARS-CoV-2 of PANGO lineage R.1 with the spike substitution E484K in three patients. Eleven other sequences in France and 8,831 worldwide were available from GISAID, 92% originating from Japan. The three genome sequences from our institute were phylogenetically closest to another from Guinea-Conakry, where one of the patients had travelled. These viruses did not exhibit any unusual features in cell culture. Spike structural predictions indicated a 1.3-time higher transmissibility index than for the globally spread B.1.1.7 variant but also an affinity loss for gangliosides that might have slowed dissemination. The spread of new SARS-CoV-2 mutants/variants is still not well understood and therefore difficult to predict, and this hinders implementation of effective preventive measures, including adapted vaccines.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35083577 PMCID: PMC8791675 DOI: 10.1007/s00705-021-05331-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Virol ISSN: 0304-8608 Impact factor: 2.685
Fig. 1Map of the SARS-CoV-2 genome (A) and number of sequences classified in PANGO lineage R.1 in the GISAID database (B). The numbers of sequences classified in PANGO lineage R.1 were obtained from the GISAID database (https://www.gisaid.org/) [10] on June 17, 2021.
Fig. 2Phylogenetic analysis based on the full-length genome sequences of the three Marseille-484K.V1 viruses and the 30 sequences with the highest BLAST scores obtained from the GISAID database (https://www.gisaid.org/) [10]. These sequences are indicated by "BBH" (for best BLASTn hit) at the beginning of the sequence name. Additional sequences indicated by REF (for reference) at the beginning of the sequence name include the genome sequence of the Wuhan-Hu-1 isolate and genome sequences obtained at our institute and classified as predominant SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nucleotide sequence alignments were performed using MUSCLE software (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/muscle/). Evolutionary history was inferred using MEGAX software (http://www.megasoftware.net/) using the neighbor-joining method and the Kimura 2-parameter model. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1,000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree; the scale bars indicate the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Bootstrap values > 50% are indicated on the tree.
Fig. 3Structural analysis of the Marseille-484K.V1 virus. (A) Localization of mutations by molecular modeling of the variant spike. (B) Effect of the E484K mutation on the electrostatic surface potential of the RBD. The values indicate the estimate of the surface potential of the RBD region facing the host cell membrane, as determined using Molegro Molecular Viewer software. Blue regions are electropositive, red regions are electronegative, and white regions are neutral. (C) Effect of the W152L mutation on the electrostatic surface potential of the NTD (upper panels). Molecular models of B.1 and mutant NTD binding to lipid rafts (GM1 gangliosides) are shown in the lower panels. Region 144-149 of the NTD is indicated in yellow (B.1 NTD) and green (Marseille_184).