Literature DB >> 34909786

A One-Step open RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection.

Ariel Cerda1,2, Maira Rivera1,3, Grace Armijo1,2, Catalina Ibarra-Henriquez1,2, Javiera Reyes1,3, Paula Blázquez-Sánchez1,3, Javiera Avilés1, Aníbal Arce1, Aldo Seguel1, Alexander J Brown4,5, Yesseny Vásquez6, Marcelo Cortez-San Martín7, Francisco Cubillos1,7, Patricia García8, Marcela Ferres8, César A Ramírez-Sarmiento1,3, Fernán Federici1,2,3, Rodrigo A Gutiérrez1,2.   

Abstract

The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), etiological agent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is currently detected by reverse transcription followed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) of its viral RNA genome. Within the available alternatives, One-Step procedures are preferred since they are fast and significantly decrease preanalytical errors, minimizing the risk of diagnostic errors. Increasing the testing capacity and tracing contacts are essential steps to control the pandemic. However, high-cost commercial reagents subject to shortage and poor scalability have hindered the use of these technologies and their adoption for a wide population-scale testing, being even more critical in developing countries. In the current context, open-source initiatives have promoted global collaboration to promote accessible solutions for rapid local deployment. As a result, open protocols are being developed for the local production of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. This work aimed to produce an open-source system for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests in RNA clinical samples. We provide guidelines for standardizing an open One-Step RT-qPCR master mix using recombinant M-MLV reverse transcriptase together with either Pfu-Sso7d or Taq DNA polymerase. Both were tested on synthetic RNA and clinical samples, observing a good correlation when compared to commercial RT-qPCR kits. Nevertheless, the best results were obtained using M-MLV RT combined with Taq DNA polymerase in a probe-based RT-qPCR assay, allowing successful discrimination between positive and negative samples with accuracies comparable to a CDC-recommended commercial kit. Here, we demonstrate that these open RT-qPCR systems can be successfully used to identify SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples and potentially be implemented in any molecular diagnostic laboratory.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34909786      PMCID: PMC8669853          DOI: 10.1101/2021.11.29.21267000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  medRxiv


  34 in total

1.  The explosion of new coronavirus tests that could help to end the pandemic.

Authors:  Giorgia Guglielmi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  COVID-19 reveals weak health systems by design: Why we must re-make global health in this historic moment.

Authors:  Sriram Shamasunder; Seth M Holmes; Tinashe Goronga; Hector Carrasco; Elyse Katz; Raphael Frankfurter; Salmaan Keshavjee
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2020-04-30

3.  One-Enzyme Reverse Transcription qPCR Using Taq DNA Polymerase.

Authors:  Sanchita Bhadra; Andre C Maranhao; Inyup Paik; Andrew D Ellington
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Amplification of nonspecific products in quantitative polymerase chain reactions (qPCR).

Authors:  Adrián Ruiz-Villalba; Elizabeth van Pelt-Verkuil; Quinn D Gunst; Jan M Ruijter; Maurice Jb van den Hoff
Journal:  Biomol Detect Quantif       Date:  2017-11-01

5.  Validation of the Hologic Aptima Unisex and Multitest Specimen Collection Kits Used for Endocervical and Male Urethral Swab Specimens (Aptima Swabs) for Collection of Samples from SARS-CoV-2-Infected Patients.

Authors:  E Avaniss-Aghajani; A Sarkissian; F Fernando; A Avaniss-Aghajani
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.

Authors:  Victor M Corman; Olfert Landt; Marco Kaiser; Richard Molenkamp; Adam Meijer; Daniel Kw Chu; Tobias Bleicker; Sebastian Brünink; Julia Schneider; Marie Luisa Schmidt; Daphne Gjc Mulders; Bart L Haagmans; Bas van der Veer; Sharon van den Brink; Lisa Wijsman; Gabriel Goderski; Jean-Louis Romette; Joanna Ellis; Maria Zambon; Malik Peiris; Herman Goossens; Chantal Reusken; Marion Pg Koopmans; Christian Drosten
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2020-01

7.  A blueprint for academic laboratories to produce SARS-CoV-2 quantitative RT-PCR test kits.

Authors:  Samantha J Mascuch; Sara Fakhretaha-Aval; Jessica C Bowman; Minh Thu H Ma; Gwendell Thomas; Bettina Bommarius; Chieri Ito; Liangjun Zhao; Gary P Newnam; Kavita R Matange; Hem R Thapa; Brett Barlow; Rebecca K Donegan; Nguyet A Nguyen; Emily G Saccuzzo; Chiamaka T Obianyor; Suneesh C Karunakaran; Pamela Pollet; Brooke Rothschild-Mancinelli; Santi Mestre-Fos; Rebecca Guth-Metzler; Anton V Bryksin; Anton S Petrov; Mallory Hazell; Carolyn B Ibberson; Petar I Penev; Robert G Mannino; Wilbur A Lam; Andrés J Garcia; Julia Kubanek; Vinayak Agarwal; Nicholas V Hud; Jennifer B Glass; Loren Dean Williams; Raquel L Lieberman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Analytical sensitivity and efficiency comparisons of SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR primer-probe sets.

Authors:  Chantal B F Vogels; Anderson F Brito; Anne L Wyllie; Joseph R Fauver; Isabel M Ott; Chaney C Kalinich; Mary E Petrone; Arnau Casanovas-Massana; M Catherine Muenker; Adam J Moore; Jonathan Klein; Peiwen Lu; Alice Lu-Culligan; Xiaodong Jiang; Daniel J Kim; Eriko Kudo; Tianyang Mao; Miyu Moriyama; Ji Eun Oh; Annsea Park; Julio Silva; Eric Song; Takehiro Takahashi; Manabu Taura; Maria Tokuyama; Arvind Venkataraman; Orr-El Weizman; Patrick Wong; Yexin Yang; Nagarjuna R Cheemarla; Elizabeth B White; Sarah Lapidus; Rebecca Earnest; Bertie Geng; Pavithra Vijayakumar; Camila Odio; John Fournier; Santos Bermejo; Shelli Farhadian; Charles S Dela Cruz; Akiko Iwasaki; Albert I Ko; Marie L Landry; Ellen F Foxman; Nathan D Grubaugh
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 30.964

9.  Pooled RNA sample reverse transcriptase real time PCR assay for SARS CoV-2 infection: A reliable, faster and economical method.

Authors:  Ekta Gupta; Abhishek Padhi; Arvind Khodare; Reshu Agarwal; Krithiga Ramachandran; Vibha Mehta; Mousumi Kilikdar; Shantanu Dubey; Guresh Kumar; Shiv Kumar Sarin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Humoral immunogenicity and tolerability of heterologous ChAd/BNT compared with homologous BNT/BNT and ChAd/ChAd SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in hemodialysis patients : A multicenter prospective observational study.

Authors:  Michael Haase; Paul Lesny; Mark Anderson; Gavin Cloherty; Michael Stec; Anja Haase-Fielitz; Mathias Haarhaus; Carla Santos-Araújo; Pedro Mota Veiga; Fernando Macario
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.393

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.