| Literature DB >> 35069926 |
Abstract
Integration of healthcare records into a single application is still a challenging process There are additional issues when data becomes heterogeneous, and its application based on users does not appear to be the same. Hence, we propose an application called MEDSHARE which is a web-based application that integrates the data from various sources and helps the patient to access all their health records in a single point of source. Apart just from the collection of data, this portal enables the process of diagnosis using Natural language processing. The process is carried out by fuzzy logic ruleset which is generated by using NLP packages. The resulted information is given to the SVM classifier which helps in the prediction of diseases resulting in 89% of accuracy and standing the best compared to other classifiers. Finally, the observations resulted are sent to the front end application and the concerned user mobile through text message in their own native language for which translation package is been used.Entities:
Keywords: Fuzzy logic; Heterogeneous data integration; MEDSHARE; Natural language processing; SVM
Year: 2022 PMID: 35069926 PMCID: PMC8761525 DOI: 10.1007/s11571-021-09758-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cogn Neurodyn ISSN: 1871-4080 Impact factor: 3.473
Fig. 1Workflow of the proposed technique
Fig. 2Steps involved in the proposed architecture
Fig. 3Categorization of data
Features present in the dataset
| Parameter | Range | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 24–98 | – |
| Sex | Male/female | – |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | 20.2–40 | People with a BMI greater than 35.14 are prone to diabetes or blood pressure. |
| Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) | 100–125 mg/dL | Patients with FPG index Over 126 mg/dL are diabetic |
| Plasma glucose concentration (PPG) | 70–110 mg/dL | Patients with PPG greater than 155 mg/dL is prone to diabetes |
| A hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) | 5.5–15.3% | It calculates the sugar level present in the red blood cell and the diabetic patients have an HbA1C value above 5.9%. |
| Plasmodium falciparum | Infected/Not | The plasmodium falciparum is mainly transmitted by the Anopheles mosquitoes. symptoms include headache, cough, tachycardia, tachypnea, chills, malaise, fatigue, diaphoresis (sweating), anorexia, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, arthralgias, and myalgias |
| Severe falciparum malaria | It is acute malaria with confirmation of vital organ dysfunction including consciousness with a Glasgow Coma Score < 11, renal impairment, prostration, multiple convulsions, shock, pulmonary edema, jaundice, significant bleeding, severe malarial anemia, and hypoglycemia | |
| Unknown fever > 38 °C mainly in the area with more malaria patients | The patients with | |
| A 2-h glucose tolerance test (2hPG) | 140–200 mg/dL | A 2hPG value > or =200 mg/dl represents diabetes |
| Total cholesterol (TC) | 89–277 mg/dL | A value ≥150 mg/dl indicates diabetes, blood pressure, or heart disease |
| Triglyceride level (TGL) | 35–500 mg/dL | The TGL metric measures the level of fat in the blood and a value ≥ 150 mg/dl indicates diabetes, blood pressure, or heart disease |
| Cough | True/false | Symptom of COVID-19/malaria |
| Sore throat | True/false | Symptom of COVID-19 |
| Shortness of breath | True/false | Symptom of COVID-19 |
| Fever | True/false | Symptom of COVID-19/malaria |
| Headache | True/false | Symptom of COVID-19/malaria |
| Contact with a COVID-19 patient | Yes/no | A near contact with a COVID-19 patient can also sometimes confirm the presence of the disease |
aPhI (1 mmol), PhB(OH)2 (1 mmol), solvent (2 mL), and base (1.5 mmol)
Fig. 4Login page
Fig. 5Sign up the process of user
Fig. 6Data collection view
Fig. 7Blood test parameters collection
Fig. 8Extraction of keywords
Fig. 9Reports view
Fig. 10Critical status of patients
Fig. 11Prediction based on data integration
Fig. 12Prediction result in Tamil
Fig. 13Prediction result in Tamil
Fig. 14Prediction accuracy
Fig. 15Comparison in terms of precision, recall, and F1-score
Fig. 16Performance evaluation using error rate
Comparative analysis results
| Techniques | Precsion (%) | Recall (%) | F1-score (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision tree | 84 | 78 | 81 |
| Naive Bayes | 82 | 75 | 80 |
| Proposed fuzzy logic with SVM | 92 | 91 | 91 |
Comparative results obtained for different diseases using F1-score
| Techniques | F1-score(%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diabetes | Blood Pressure | Malaria | COVID 19 | |||||
| Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | |
| Decision tree | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.79 |
| Naive Bayes | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.82 |
| Proposed fuzzy logic with SVM | 0.91 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.96 |
Fig. 17Usability testing