Sun-Hye Lee1, Pureun-Haneul Lee1, Byeong-Gon Kim1, Hyun-Jeong Seo1, Ae-Rin Baek1, Jong-Sook Park1, June-Hyuk Lee1, Sung-Woo Park1, Do-Jin Kim1, Choon-Sik Park1, An-Soo Jang2. 1. Division of Respiratory and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, 170 Jomaru-ro, Wonmi-gu, Bucheon, Gyeonggi-do, 14584, Republic of Korea. 2. Division of Respiratory and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, 170 Jomaru-ro, Wonmi-gu, Bucheon, Gyeonggi-do, 14584, Republic of Korea. jas877@schme.ac.kr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Annexin-A1 (ANXA1) is a glucocorticoid-induced protein with multiple actions in the regulation of inflammatory cell activation. The anti-inflammatory protein ANXA1 and its N-formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) have protective effects on organ fibrosis. However, the exact role of ANXA1 in asthma remains to be determined. The aim of this study was to identify the role of ANXA1 in bronchial asthma. METHODS: In mice sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA-OVA mice) and mice sensitized with saline and challenged with air (control mice), we investigated the potential links between ANXA1 levels and bronchial asthma using ELISA, immunoblotting, and immunohistochemical staining. Moreover, we also determined ANXA1 levels in blood from 50 asthmatic patients (stable and exacerbated states). RESULTS: ANXA1 protein levels in lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were significantly higher in OVA-OVA mice compared with control mice. FPR2 protein levels in lung tissue were significantly higher in OVA-OVA mice compared with control mice. Plasma ANXA1 levels were increased in asthmatic patients compared with healthy controls. Plasma ANXA1 levels were significantly lower in exacerbated patients compared with stable patients with bronchial asthma (p < 0.05). The plasma ANXA1 levels in controlled asthmatic patients were correlated with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (r = - 0.191, p = 0.033) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) (r = -0.202, p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ANXA1 may be a potential marker and therapeutic target for asthma.
BACKGROUND:Annexin-A1 (ANXA1) is a glucocorticoid-induced protein with multiple actions in the regulation of inflammatory cell activation. The anti-inflammatory protein ANXA1 and its N-formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) have protective effects on organ fibrosis. However, the exact role of ANXA1 in asthma remains to be determined. The aim of this study was to identify the role of ANXA1 in bronchial asthma. METHODS: In mice sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA-OVAmice) and mice sensitized with saline and challenged with air (control mice), we investigated the potential links between ANXA1 levels and bronchial asthma using ELISA, immunoblotting, and immunohistochemical staining. Moreover, we also determined ANXA1 levels in blood from 50 asthmatic patients (stable and exacerbated states). RESULTS:ANXA1 protein levels in lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were significantly higher in OVA-OVAmice compared with control mice. FPR2 protein levels in lung tissue were significantly higher in OVA-OVAmice compared with control mice. Plasma ANXA1 levels were increased in asthmatic patients compared with healthy controls. Plasma ANXA1 levels were significantly lower in exacerbated patients compared with stable patients with bronchial asthma (p < 0.05). The plasma ANXA1 levels in controlled asthmatic patients were correlated with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (r = - 0.191, p = 0.033) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) (r = -0.202, p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ANXA1 may be a potential marker and therapeutic target for asthma.
Annexin A1 (ANXA1) is a glucocorticoid-induced protein with multiple functions in the regulation of inflammatory cell activation. ANXA1 is a 37 kDa protein that can bind to cellular membranes in a Ca2 + −dependent manner. The protein has been reported to have anti-phospholipase activity following glucocorticoid induction and possesses a wide range of physiological and pathological functions [1-6]. The biological effects of ANXA1 differ based on intra- versus extracellular localization [7-9]. The extracellular form of ANXA1 stimulates cell motility and cancer cell invasion, mostly via interaction with specific receptors such as the G-protein-coupled formyl peptide receptor (FPR) family [3, 10, 11].ANXA1 has anti-inflammatory effects by stimulating inflammatory cell programmed cell death and prohibiting eicosanoid synthesis [12, 13]. ANXA1 levels were decreased in smokers or patients with asthma, cystic fibrosis, and rheumatoid arthritis [14-17]. The reduced levels of lipoxin A4 (LXA4) and ANXA1 were reported in wheezy infants [17] and patients with severe asthma [18-20]. In addition, experimental studies have shown that ANXA1 is associated with asthma development [16].However, the role of ANXA1 in the pathogenesis of asthma is not clear. Using a mouse model, we evaluated ANXA1 expression and levels in the blood of asthmatic patients and evaluated the relationship between ANXA1 levels and clinical profiles in asthma.
Methods
Experimental design
Fifty asthmatic patients were recruited and followed for 6.6 ± 3.6 years, and plasma ANXA1 levels were determined during the stable and exacerbated states (Table 1). Experiments involving patients were approved by Soonchunhyang University’s institutional review board (IRB). Eight BALB/c mice were exposed to saline (control) or ovalbumin (OVA). Detailed analyses included evaluation of lung ANXA1 phospho Tyr21 levels and lung histology and FPR2 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and lung tissue. Cells were treated with titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2) and dexamethasone (DEX). The animal studies were approved by Soonchunhyang University’s institutional animal care and use committee.
Table 1
Clinical characteristics in control subjects and patients with asthma
Characteristic
Control subjects
Asthmatic patients
Stable
Exacerbated
No of subjects
25
50
Sex (male/female)
2/23
20/30
Age (of initial visit), yr
58.3 ± 6.2
54.9 ± 14.1
Onset of asthma: age, yr
47.06 ± 17.25
Asthma duration, yr
6.63 ± 3.60
Smoking status (NS/ES/CS)
25/0/0
32/12/6
Cigarettes smoked, pack. yr
9.0 ± 15.7
Body Mass Index, kg/ m2
24.8 ± 2.61
25.4 ± 3.31
Stable and exacerbate lung function
FEV1, % pred.
115.36 ± 16.59
85.43 ± 19.82
62.60 ± 18.14†
FVC, % pred.
96.56 ± 14.51
84.83 ± 16.68
66.51 ± 16.76†
FEV1 /FVC
84.24 ± 6.05
74.53 ± 9.72
68.07 ± 11.84†
PC20, mg/ml
9.18 ± 10.37
Total IgE, kU
106.63 ± 188.7
421.5 ± 699.19*
Atopy
1 (4%)
21 (42%)*
Attack average/yr
3.38 ± 3.24
Duration of exacerbation during follow up
6.63 ± 3.61
Blood WBC/uL
5587.2 ± 1268.0
7768.8 ± 3448.9*
9873.0 ± 4917.1
Blood eosinophil, %
2.73 ± 2.26
5.09 ± 4.97*
3.83 ± 5.42
Blood neutrophil, %
56.25 ± 9.8
54.7 ± 12.9
64.6 ± 19.3†
Data expressed as mean ± SD. BMI body mass index, ES ex-smoker, FEV forced expiratory volume in one second, FVC forced vital capacity, NS non-smoker, PC20 methacholine; the concentration of methacholine required to decrease the FEV1 by 20%, SM; smoker. *p < 0.01 compared with control subjects, †p < 0.05 compared with stable asthmatics
Clinical characteristics in control subjects and patients with asthmaData expressed as mean ± SD. BMI body mass index, ES ex-smoker, FEV forced expiratory volume in one second, FVC forced vital capacity, NS non-smoker, PC20methacholine; the concentration of methacholine required to decrease the FEV1 by 20%, SM; smoker. *p < 0.01 compared with control subjects, †p < 0.05 compared with stable asthmatics
Subjects
All patients were recruited from Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon Hospital. Asthma diagnoses were based on the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines [21]. This study used the same sample examined by Moon et al. [22] although several different measures and analyses are presented. The biospecimens and data used in this study were provided by the biobank of Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, a member of the Korean Biobank Network.All subjects had a clinical diagnosis of asthma supported by one or more of the following criteria: 1) variation in the maximum diurnal peak expiratory flow >20% over the course of 14 days, 2) an increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of >15% after inhalation of 200–400 μg albuterol, or 3) a 20% reduction in FEV1 in response to a stimulating concentration of inhaled methacholine (PC20methacholine) < 10 mg/ml. All subjects underwent standardized assessments, which included analyses of induced sputum specimens, complete differential blood cell counts, immunoglobulin E (IgE) measurements, chest posteroanterior radiography, allergy skin prick tests, and spirometry. All data were collected at the time of diagnosis, before administration of the asthma medication.Among asthmatic patients from the hospital, asthmatics matched to normal controls in terms of age, sex, and BMI were selected for the study. Normal control subjects were recruited from among the spouses of the patients or members of the general population who answered negatively to a screening questionnaire regarding respiratory symptoms and other allergic diseases, had FEV1 values >80% predicted, PC20methacholine level > 10 mg/ml, and normal findings on simple chest radiographs. Of the subjects who completed a follow-up period of at least 2 years, 50 were diagnosed using the GINA guidelines [21].
Asthma exacerbation
Asthma exacerbation was analyzed in subjects who had completed regular follow-up for at least 2 years. Asthma exacerbation was defined by the GINA guidelines as episodes of progressively increasing shortness of breath, cough, wheezing, chest tightness, or some combination of these symptoms, accompanied by decreased expiratory airflow and use of systemic corticosteroids (tablets, suspensions, or injections) or an increase in dose from the stable maintenance dose for at least 3 days and a hospitalization or emergency department visit due to asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids.
Elisa
ANXA1 levels in the blood of asthmatic patients was measured by Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; R&D System, Minneapolis, MN, USA). To compare results from different plates, the optical densities (ODs) of the test samples were adjusted relative to the positive and negative control samples supplied in each kit. The mean OD of duplicate wells was calculated. The index value of each test sample was defined by the following formula: index = (OD of test sample – OD of negative control)/(OD of positive control – OD of negative control) × 100. Low detection limits were set at 0.119 ng/mL for ANXA1 according to the manufacturer’s recommendation.
Animals
Female 6-week-old BALB/c mice (6 weeks of age, weighing 20–24 g) were purchased from Charles River Korea (Orient Bio Inc., Seongnam, Korea). All mice were sensitized by intraperitoneal injection on days 0 and 14 with 50 μg grade V chicken egg OVA (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) emulsified with 10 mg hydroxyl aluminum in 100 μl Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (D-PBS). On days 21–23, all mice received intranasal challenges with 150 μg grade III OVA (Sigma-Aldrich) in 50 μl D-PBS. Control mice were sensitized and challenged with saline. On day 24, airway hyper responsiveness (AHR) was measured, BALF was collected, and lung tissue was processed for protein, RNA, and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC).
AHR, BALF, and morphology analysis
Mice were anesthetized with 2.5 mg/kg tiletamine and xylazine (Zoletil and lumpum; Bayer Korea Co, Seoul, Korea), and AHR was assessed following challenges with 0, 5, 20, or 100 mg/ml methacholine (Sigma-Aldrich). Measurements of airway hyperresponsiveness were conducted using an animal pulmonary instrument (OCP-3000) 1 min after each dose with 3 min between doses. The following day, BALF was obtained, centrifuged, and the supernatant stored (−20 °C). The cell pellet was resuspended for cell counting, and cytospin slides were prepared for stained with modified Diff-Quick stain. Differential cell counting was performed on at least 500 cells in each slide using standard morphological criteria under a light microscope. A portion of the lung was fixed in 4% phosphate-buffered paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, sectioned (4 μm), and stained (H&E and IHC staining).
Immunohistochemistry
Mouse lung sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated in an ethanol gradient series. The sections were incubated with 1.4% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min to block endogenous peroxidases, with 1.5% horse serum to block non-specific binding, and then with the anti-rabbitANXA1 primary antibody (1200, Thermo Fisher, Rockford, IL, USA). The next day, sections were treated with the ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). The color reaction was developed by staining with liquid DAB+ substrate (Golden Bridge International Inc., Mukilteo, WA, USA). After immunohistochemical staining, the slides were counterstained with Harris’s hematoxylin for 1 min. Images were analyzed with the ImageJ program (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md).
Western blot
The extracted lung tissues were homogenized in a protein lysis solution containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 50 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 100 mM PMSF in distilled water. After centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C, the soluble materials were collected. Mouse lung lysates and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked in TBS with 5% skim milk and 0.1% Tween 20 for 1 h at room temperature before incubating with rabbit anti-ANXA1 (1:1000, Thermo Fisher) or rabbit anti-FPRL1/FPR2 (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, USA) or rabbit anti-ANXA1 (phospho Tyr21) (1:500, Genetex, San Antonio, TX, USA) (overnight, 4 °C). The membranes were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, USA). Detection was performed using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) plus Western Blot Detection System (ATTO, Tokyo, Japan) on X-ray film. The relative protein levels were determined by quantitative densitometry and were normalized to anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody (1:5000, Sigma-Aldrich) levels.
Cell culture
Normal human bronchial primary epithelial cells (NHBE) were purchased from Lonza (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland, cat#. CC-2540). NHBE cells were plated at 3000 cells/cm2 in culture 75 cm2 flasks in bronchial epithelial cell growth medium supplemented with the BEGM BulletKit™ (Bronchial Epithelial Cell Growth Medium) (Lonza, cat#: CC-3170) and cultured at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The medium was changed every 48 h, and the cells were grown to 80–90% confluence for 5 to 6 days. NHBE cells (second-passage) with density 1.5 × 106 cells/ml were seeded on in 6-well plate with BEGM medium. The 24 h prior to the experiment, the medium was changed to BEBM basal medium. The cells were exposed to 100 μM TiO2 and 10 μM DEX (Sigma-Aldrich, Melbourne, VIC, Australia). Additionally, control cell lines are not exposed to DEX and TiO2. Cells were treated with different doses time (4, 8, 24 h).
Statistical analysis
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using significant predictors (as determined via multivariate regression) to derive best suitable cut-off values and to assess model discrimination and predictive accuracy. Determination of optimal cutoff points were conducted with SPSS statistical software package (ver. 20.0; SPSS Inc.; Chicago, IL, USA).The data were double-entered into the SPSS statistical software package (20).Data with a normal distribution were described by means and standard deviations and compared using a two-sample t-test; data with non-parametric distributions were described by the median and interquartile ranges (IQR) and compared using Mann-Whitney U-test (intergroup analysis) or Pearson’s χ2 test for normally distributed, skewed, and categorical data, respectively. Differences between the patient populations were analyzed by χ2 test with Fisher’s exact test when low expected cell counts were encountered. Different correlation coefficients were calculated the Spearman’s correlation analysis. p < 0.05 was deemed to indicate statistical significance.
Results
ANXA1 plasma levels in asthmatic patients
Plasma ANXA1 levels in asthmatic patients (0.570 ± 0.043 ng/ml) were higher than those in healthy control subjects (0.312 ± 0.078 ng/ml; Interquartile range, IQR: 0.0–0.611), (p < 0.01) (Fig. 1a). Plasma ANXA1 levels were significantly lower in exacerbated patients (0.497 ± 0.058 ng/ml; IQR: 0.038–0.850) compared with stable patients (0.645 ± 0.061 ng/ml; IQR: 0.447–0.871), (p < 0.05) (Fig. 1a). Therefore, this study calculated the best cut-off values of the Annexin-A1 ELISA in patients. By receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), the best cut-off value of Annexin-A1 ELISA was 0.5023 ng/mL in patients (sensitivity and specificity were 68% and 99.68%, resp.), and the area under curve (AUC) was 0.680 (95% CI; 0.596–0.829), (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1b).
Fig. 1
Plasma Annexin-A1(ANXA1) level in healthy control, stable state and exacerbated state of asthmatic patients. a Annexin-A1 levels were increased in stable state (n = 45) as compared with healthy controls (n = 25). Data are box plots with median value and minimal and maximal distribution. *p < 0.01 compared to healthy control subjects. †p < 0.05 compared to stable state of asthmatic patients. b ROC curves for Annexin-A1 ELISA in human plasma. Comparison between healthy controls (n = 25) and asthmatic patients (n = 93) was compared (AUC = 0.680, CI 0.596 to 0.829, p < 0.001). Diagonal line represents hypothetical curve corresponding to a test with no discriminatory power. AUC, area under the curve; ROC, Receiver operating characteristic
Plasma Annexin-A1(ANXA1) level in healthy control, stable state and exacerbated state of asthmatic patients. a Annexin-A1 levels were increased in stable state (n = 45) as compared with healthy controls (n = 25). Data are box plots with median value and minimal and maximal distribution. *p < 0.01 compared to healthy control subjects. †p < 0.05 compared to stable state of asthmatic patients. b ROC curves for Annexin-A1 ELISA in human plasma. Comparison between healthy controls (n = 25) and asthmatic patients (n = 93) was compared (AUC = 0.680, CI 0.596 to 0.829, p < 0.001). Diagonal line represents hypothetical curve corresponding to a test with no discriminatory power. AUC, area under the curve; ROC, Receiver operating characteristic
Relationship between ANXA1 levels and clinical variables
The population characteristics are shown in Table 1. Plasma ANXA1 levels in controlled asthmatic patients were correlated with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1%) pred. (r = −0.191, p = 0.033) (Fig. 2a) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC), (r = −0.202, p = 0.024) (Fig. 2b). Smoking asthmatics tended to have lower levels of ANXA1 compared with non-smoking asthmatics (4.14 ± 0.31 vs. 4.56 ± 0.99 ng/ml; p > 0.05). There was no relationship between ANXA1 and age, smoking amount, body mass index, PC20, white blood cell count, or total IgE levels.
Fig. 2
Relationship between plasma AXNA1 level and lung function. Scatter plots of measured values for (a) FEV1% (spearman, r = −0.191, p = 0.033) (b) FEV1/FVC (spearman, r = −0.202, p = 0.024) against Annexin-A1 levels. Healthy controls (n = 25), stable sate (n = 45), exacerbated asthma (n = 48). FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, forced vital capacity
Relationship between plasma AXNA1 level and lung function. Scatter plots of measured values for (a) FEV1% (spearman, r = −0.191, p = 0.033) (b) FEV1/FVC (spearman, r = −0.202, p = 0.024) against Annexin-A1 levels. Healthy controls (n = 25), stable sate (n = 45), exacerbated asthma (n = 48). FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, forced vital capacity
Airway hyperresponsiveness and differential cell counts in mouse asthma model
Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) was increased in the OVA sensitized and OVA challenged mice (OVA-OVAmice group) compared with saline sensitized and air challenged mice (Control mice group) (Fig. 3a). Inflammatory cells, including eosinophils, macrophages, lymphocytes and neutrophils were increased in the BAL fluid in OVA-OVAmice compared with control mice group (Fig. 3b). The results demonstrated that induced the infiltration of inflammatory cells into the BAL fluid of the OVA-OVA challenged mice.
Fig. 3
AHR and Differential cell counts in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. a AHR developed in the OVA-induced asthma in allergic BALB/c mice group. AHR in the mice treated with increasing concentrations of methacholine (0–100 mg/ml) was measured 24 h following the final OVA challenge (n = 8). (*p < 0.05, vs. saline control). AHR, Airway hyperresponsiveness; OVA, ovalbumin. b Inflammatory cell counts in BAL fluid obtained from sensitized mice final OVA challenge. Dose-dependently increased OVA-induced inflammatory cell counts in BAL fluid from sensitized mice 24 h after the last OVA aerosol challenge. Cells from BALF were counted, spun onto glass slides and stained with Diff-Quik before microscopy (n = 8). *p < 0.05 compared to control subjects
AHR and Differential cell counts in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. a AHR developed in the OVA-induced asthma in allergic BALB/c mice group. AHR in the mice treated with increasing concentrations of methacholine (0–100 mg/ml) was measured 24 h following the final OVA challenge (n = 8). (*p < 0.05, vs. saline control). AHR, Airway hyperresponsiveness; OVA, ovalbumin. b Inflammatory cell counts in BAL fluid obtained from sensitized mice final OVA challenge. Dose-dependently increased OVA-induced inflammatory cell counts in BAL fluid from sensitized mice 24 h after the last OVA aerosol challenge. Cells from BALF were counted, spun onto glass slides and stained with Diff-Quik before microscopy (n = 8). *p < 0.05 compared to control subjects
ANXA1 in a mouse model of asthma and NHBE cells
ANXA1 protein levels were significantly increased in lung tissue (Fig. 4) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) (Fig. 5) of mice sensitized and challenged with OVA (OVA-OVAmice) compared with mice sensitized with saline and challenged with air (control mice). FPR2 (Fig. 6) protein levels were significantly increased in the lung tissue of OVA-OVAmice compared with control mice. ANXA1-phospho Tyr21 protein levels were significantly increased in the lung tissue (Fig. 7) of OVA-OVAmice compared with control mice. ANXA1 protein levels were increased (Fig. 8) in dexamethasone (DEX) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) treated NHBE cells at 4, 8, 24 h (p < 0.05, controls vs. DEX or DEX + TiO2 or TiO2).
Fig. 4
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemical staining (IHC) of mouse lung paraffin sections. Lung ANXA1 expression in the mouse lung following ovalbumin (OVA-OVA) sensitization and challenge in immunohistochemical stain with anti-ANXA1 antibody. Increased ANXA1 expression was noted in mononuclear inflammatory cells and endothelial cells, and epithelial cells in OVA-sensitized/challenged mice. *p < 0.05 compared to control subjects
Fig. 5
Lung ANXA1 and N-formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) protein levels increase in ovalbumin sensitized and challenged (OVA-OVA) mice. a Protein level of ANXA1 and FPR2 as determined by western blot increase in the lung of OVA-OVA mice. b Densitometry was determined with 3 immunoblots and normalized to β-actin. The experiment was repeated three times and densitometry was determined with normalized to β-actin. *p < 0.05 compared to control subjects
Fig. 6
Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) ANXA1 protein levels increased in ovalbumin sensitized and challenged (OVA-OVA) mice. Protein level of ANXA1 as determined by western blot increase in Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of OVA-OVA mice. The experiment was repeated three times and densitometry was determined with normalized to β-actin. *p < 0.05 compared to control subjects
Fig. 7
Lung phosphorylated ANXA1 protein levels increased in ovalbumin sensitized and challenged (OVA-OVA) mice. Phosphorylated protein level of ANXA1 as determined by western blot increase in the lung tissue of OVA-OVA mice. The experiment was repeated three times and densitometry was determined with normalized to β-actin. *p < 0.05 compared to control subjects
Fig. 8
ANXA1 protein levels increased in dexamethasone (DEX) and titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2) particles treated NHBE cells at 4, 8, 24 h. Protein level of ANXA1 as determined by western blot increase in extracts of NHBE cells. The experiment was repeated three times and densitometry was determined with normalized to β-actin. *p < 0.01 vs. control
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemical staining (IHC) of mouse lung paraffin sections. Lung ANXA1 expression in the mouse lung following ovalbumin (OVA-OVA) sensitization and challenge in immunohistochemical stain with anti-ANXA1 antibody. Increased ANXA1 expression was noted in mononuclear inflammatory cells and endothelial cells, and epithelial cells in OVA-sensitized/challenged mice. *p < 0.05 compared to control subjectsLung ANXA1 and N-formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) protein levels increase in ovalbumin sensitized and challenged (OVA-OVA) mice. a Protein level of ANXA1 and FPR2 as determined by western blot increase in the lung of OVA-OVAmice. b Densitometry was determined with 3 immunoblots and normalized to β-actin. The experiment was repeated three times and densitometry was determined with normalized to β-actin. *p < 0.05 compared to control subjectsBronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) ANXA1 protein levels increased in ovalbumin sensitized and challenged (OVA-OVA) mice. Protein level of ANXA1 as determined by western blot increase in Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of OVA-OVAmice. The experiment was repeated three times and densitometry was determined with normalized to β-actin. *p < 0.05 compared to control subjectsLung phosphorylated ANXA1 protein levels increased in ovalbumin sensitized and challenged (OVA-OVA) mice. Phosphorylated protein level of ANXA1 as determined by western blot increase in the lung tissue of OVA-OVAmice. The experiment was repeated three times and densitometry was determined with normalized to β-actin. *p < 0.05 compared to control subjectsANXA1 protein levels increased in dexamethasone (DEX) and titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2) particles treated NHBE cells at 4, 8, 24 h. Protein level of ANXA1 as determined by western blot increase in extracts of NHBE cells. The experiment was repeated three times and densitometry was determined with normalized to β-actin. *p < 0.01 vs. control
Discussion
In this study, plasma ANXA1 levels were increased in patients with asthma but decreased in patients with exacerbated asthma. ANXA1 levels were also correlated with lung function, suggesting that ANXA1 may be a potential marker for asthma.Annexins are soluble proteins that bind to cell membranes containing negatively charged phospholipids, principally phosphatidylserine, in a Ca2 + −dependent manner. The contribution of anti-inflammatory protein ANXA1 and its receptor FPR2 to the regulation of inflammatory responses in human normal lung fibroblasts has been reported previously [23-25]. ANXA1 and FPR2 have protective effects in organ fibrosis [26].ANXA1, an abundant intracellular protein expressed in many cell types, has known to be induced by glucocorticoids (GCs) and to inhibit phospholipase activity [24-29]. Recombinant ANXA1 or ANXA1-derived N-terminal peptides has similar actions like the anti-inflammatory action of glucocorticoids such as inhibition of inflammatory cells, and suppressing inflammatory mediators [26, 30].In this study, total and phosphorylated ANXA1 levels were increased in a mouse model of asthma and in inflammatory, endothelial, and epithelial cells. In addition, receptor FPR2 expression was increased in OVA-challenged mice, suggesting that ANXA1 may be involved in asthma pathogenesis.The ANXA1 receptor FPR2 as a specific G-protein-coupled receptor binds to LXA4 (an anti-inflammatory lipid) and serum amyloid protein, which mediate ligand-specific effects [30, 31]. FPR2 has expressed in human lung fibroblasts, and induced by GCs in human myeloid cells [32, 33].ANXA1 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids were higher in smokers [14] and patients with cystic fibrosis [15]. A form of ANXA1 with a molecular weight of 33 kDa is released rather than the 37 kDa ANXA1, suggesting that ANXA1 be degraded in smokers and patients with cystic fibrosis [16, 17]. Ng et al. [16] reported that an ANXA-1-deficient mice exhibit spontaneous airway hyperresponsiveness and exacerbated allergen-specific antibody responses in a mouse model of asthma.In this study plasma levels of ANXA1 were increased in asthmatic patients compared with healthy control subjects, which is similar to the findings of other studies [17-20], suggesting that ANXA1 has compensatory anti-inflammatory effects in asthma. But increased plasma ANXA1 level in stable asthma is decreased in exacerbated asthmatics, indicating that circulating ANXA1 may be decreased due to ANXA1 increase in target inflammatory site in exacerbated state of asthma. To clarify the effect of steroids and particulate matter on ANXA1, we determined the effect of GCs and particulate matter on ANXA1 expression. Dexamethasone and particulate matter induced ANXA1 protein expression, indicating that particulate matter and GCs can activate ANXA1.
Conclusions
In conclusion, this study demonstrated higher levels of ANXA1 in asthmatic patients and lower levels in exacerbated asthmatic patients. In addition, there was a significant relationship between ANXA1 and lung function in asthmatic patients, indicating that ANXA1 is potentially involved in the pathogenesis of asthma.Furthermore, the findings in this study indicated that serum ANXA1 concentration represents a biomarker for asthma, which has potential utility as a diagnostic tool. However, larger numbers of asthmatic patients are required for prospective studies, and further studies are warranted to investigate the potential mechanism of ANXA1 in asthma.
Authors: Bruce D Levy; Caroline Bonnans; Eric S Silverman; Lyle J Palmer; Gautham Marigowda; Elliot Israel Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-06-16 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Richard D Ye; François Boulay; Ji Ming Wang; Claes Dahlgren; Craig Gerard; Marc Parmentier; Charles N Serhan; Philip M Murphy Journal: Pharmacol Rev Date: 2009-06-04 Impact factor: 25.468
Authors: Anna Planagumà; Shamsah Kazani; Gautham Marigowda; Oliver Haworth; Thomas J Mariani; Elliot Israel; Eugene R Bleecker; Douglas Curran-Everett; Serpil C Erzurum; William J Calhoun; Mario Castro; Kian Fan Chung; Benjamin Gaston; Nizar N Jarjour; William W Busse; Sally E Wenzel; Bruce D Levy Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2008-06-26 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Natasha A Winter; Peter G Gibson; Michael Fricker; Jodie L Simpson; Peter A Wark; Vanessa M McDonald Journal: Allergy Asthma Immunol Res Date: 2021-05 Impact factor: 5.764
Authors: Cindy Barnig; Tjitske Bezema; Philip C Calder; Anne Charloux; Nelly Frossard; Johan Garssen; Oliver Haworth; Ksenia Dilevskaya; Francesca Levi-Schaffer; Evelyne Lonsdorfer; Marca Wauben; Aletta D Kraneveld; Anje A Te Velde Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Yun Gi Lee; Jisu Hong; Pureun Haneul Lee; Junehyuk Lee; Sung Woo Park; DoJin Kim; An Soo Jang Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2020-11-09 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Liang Wu; Changjie Liu; Dong-Yuan Chang; Rui Zhan; Jing Sun; Shi-He Cui; Sean Eddy; Viji Nair; Emily Tanner; Frank C Brosius; Helen C Looker; Robert G Nelson; Matthias Kretzler; Jian-Cheng Wang; Ming Xu; Wenjun Ju; Ming-Hui Zhao; Min Chen; Lemin Zheng Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 10.612