A Névéol1, P Zweigenbaum. 1. Aurélie Névéol, LIMSI CNRS UPR 3251, Rue John von Neumann, Campus Universitaire d'Orsay, 91405 Orsay cedex, France, E-mail: {neveol,pz}@limsi.fr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To summarize recent research and present a selection of the best papers published in 2014 in the field of clinical Natural Language Processing (NLP). METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was performed by the two section editors of the IMIA Yearbook NLP section by searching bibliographic databases with a focus on NLP efforts applied to clinical texts or aimed at a clinical outcome. A shortlist of candidate best papers was first selected by the section editors before being peer-reviewed by independent external reviewers. RESULTS: The clinical NLP best paper selection shows that the field is tackling text analysis methods of increasing depth. The full review process highlighted five papers addressing foundational methods in clinical NLP using clinically relevant texts from online forums or encyclopedias, clinical texts from Electronic Health Records, and included studies specifically aiming at a practical clinical outcome. The increased access to clinical data that was made possible with the recent progress of de-identification paved the way for the scientific community to address complex NLP problems such as word sense disambiguation, negation, temporal analysis and specific information nugget extraction. These advances in turn allowed for efficient application of NLP to clinical problems such as cancer patient triage. Another line of research investigates online clinically relevant texts and brings interesting insight on communication strategies to convey health-related information. CONCLUSIONS: The field of clinical NLP is thriving through the contributions of both NLP researchers and healthcare professionals interested in applying NLP techniques for concrete healthcare purposes. Clinical NLP is becoming mature for practical applications with a significant clinical impact.
OBJECTIVE: To summarize recent research and present a selection of the best papers published in 2014 in the field of clinical Natural Language Processing (NLP). METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was performed by the two section editors of the IMIA Yearbook NLP section by searching bibliographic databases with a focus on NLP efforts applied to clinical texts or aimed at a clinical outcome. A shortlist of candidate best papers was first selected by the section editors before being peer-reviewed by independent external reviewers. RESULTS: The clinical NLP best paper selection shows that the field is tackling text analysis methods of increasing depth. The full review process highlighted five papers addressing foundational methods in clinical NLP using clinically relevant texts from online forums or encyclopedias, clinical texts from Electronic Health Records, and included studies specifically aiming at a practical clinical outcome. The increased access to clinical data that was made possible with the recent progress of de-identification paved the way for the scientific community to address complex NLP problems such as word sense disambiguation, negation, temporal analysis and specific information nugget extraction. These advances in turn allowed for efficient application of NLP to clinical problems such as cancerpatient triage. Another line of research investigates online clinically relevant texts and brings interesting insight on communication strategies to convey health-related information. CONCLUSIONS: The field of clinical NLP is thriving through the contributions of both NLP researchers and healthcare professionals interested in applying NLP techniques for concrete healthcare purposes. Clinical NLP is becoming mature for practical applications with a significant clinical impact.
Entities:
Keywords:
Awards and Prizes; Computer-Assisted; Decision Making; Medical Informatics/trends; Natural Language Processing; Semantics
Authors: Veronika Laippala; Timo Viljanen; Antti Airola; Jenna Kanerva; Sanna Salanterä; Tapio Salakoski; Filip Ginter Journal: Artif Intell Med Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 5.326
Authors: Srinivasan V Iyer; Rave Harpaz; Paea LePendu; Anna Bauer-Mehren; Nigam H Shah Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Roy J Byrd; Steven R Steinhubl; Jimeng Sun; Shahram Ebadollahi; Walter F Stewart Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2013-01-11 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Elina Kontio; Antti Airola; Tapio Pahikkala; Heljä Lundgren-Laine; Kristiina Junttila; Heikki Korvenranta; Tapio Salakoski; Sanna Salanterä Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2014-04-12 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Dmitriy Dligach; Steven Bethard; Lee Becker; Timothy Miller; Guergana K Savova Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Aleena Banerji; Kenneth H Lai; Yu Li; Rebecca R Saff; Carlos A Camargo; Kimberly G Blumenthal; Li Zhou Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2019-12-16
Authors: Prakash Adekkanattu; Guoqian Jiang; Yuan Luo; Paul R Kingsbury; Zhenxing Xu; Luke V Rasmussen; Jennifer A Pacheco; Richard C Kiefer; Daniel J Stone; Pascal S Brandt; Liang Yao; Yizhen Zhong; Yu Deng; Fei Wang; Jessica S Ancker; Thomas R Campion; Jyotishman Pathak Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2020-03-04
Authors: Stephen B Johnson; Prakash Adekkanattu; Thomas R Campion; James Flory; Jyotishman Pathak; Olga V Patterson; Scott L DuVall; Vincent Major; Yindalon Aphinyanaphongs Journal: AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc Date: 2018-05-18