| Literature DB >> 35062974 |
Zhuo Cheng1,2,3, Xiaoping Lu1,2,3, Fengke Lin1,2,3, Abid Naeem4, Chunlin Long5,6,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dulong (Drung people) are one of the ethnic minorities of China, consisting of a small population living in remote and mountainous regions with limited facilities. Over the years, the Dulong have maintained their livelihood by collecting wild medicinal and edible plants. Therefore, through their experience and understanding, they had accumulated sufficient traditional knowledge about local plant resources. Since ancient times, wild edible plants have been essential to the food security of the Dulong people. However, there is almost no comprehensive report available on WEPs consumed by the Dulong people. The objectives of this study were to: (1) make a systematic study of WEPs used by Dulong people, (2) record traditional knowledge related to WEPs, (3) analyze multiple uses of WEPs, and (4) evaluate species with significant cultural significance to Dulong people.Entities:
Keywords: Dulong people; Dulongjiang area; Ethnobotany; Traditional knowledge; Wild edible plants
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35062974 PMCID: PMC8781162 DOI: 10.1186/s13002-022-00501-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed ISSN: 1746-4269 Impact factor: 2.733
Fig. 1Sketch map of the study area
Study site locations and demographic characteristics of respondents
| Village | Gender | Age | Education level | Occupation | Location | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ≤ 19 | 20–39 | 40–59 | ≥ 60 | Illiterate | Primary | Secondary | High school and above | Farming | Salary work | Trading | Student | Latitude (north) | Longitude (east) | Distance to the Township (km) | |
| Dizhengdang | 11 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 27° 44′ 9ʺ | 98° 20′ 58ʺ | Far (23.44) |
| Longyuan | 15 | 8 | 0 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 13 | 2 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 27° 52′ 18ʺ | 98° 20′ 25ʺ | Far (16.75) |
| Xianjiudang | 14 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 28° 4′ 35ʺ | 98° 19′ 33ʺ | Near (7.37) |
| Kongdang | 11 | 10 | 0 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 28° 0′ 51ʺ | 98° 18′ 48ʺ | Near (0) |
| Bapo | 12 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 27° 55′ 9ʺ | 98° 20′ 59ʺ | Far (15.07) |
| Maku | 12 | 8 | 2 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 27° 41′ 18ʺ | 98° 17′ 53ʺ | Far (21.36) |
| Total | 75 | 52 | 8 | 59 | 39 | 21 | 26 | 27 | 55 | 19 | 88 | 28 | 3 | 8 | |||
Questions used for semi-structured interviews
| No. | Questions |
|---|---|
| (1) | What wild plants have you eaten? |
| (2) | What is the local name of the plant? |
| (3) | Where do you collect the plant? |
| (4) | Which part of the plant do you eat? |
| (5) | How do you process the plant? |
| (6) | What is the utilization frequency of this plant? |
| (7) | How does this plant taste? |
| (8) | Can this plant be used as medicinal food? |
| (9) | Is there any other use for this plant? |
| (10) | When is this plant collected? |
List of wild edible plants used by Drung
Fig. 2a Life forms of WEPs used by Dulong people; b Family distribution of WEPs species of angiosperm category; c Food categories of WEPs species; d Edible parts
Fig. 3Months of collection for WEPs
Fig. 4Some wild vegetables in the study area. a, d Cardamine tangutorum; b, e Maianthemum atropurpureum; c, f Aralia elata
Fig. 5Some wild fruits in the study area. a Cornus capitata; b Saurauia napaulensis; c Holboellia angustifolia; d Elaeocarpus lacunosus; e Garcinia esculenta; f Calamus acanthospathus; g Actinidia pilosula; h Ficus semicordata; I Rubus sumatranus
Fig. 6Some staple food substitutes in the study area. a–c Angiopteris esculenta; d–f Cardiocrinum giganteum; g–i Caryota obtusa
Fig. 7Miscellaneous WEPs in the study area. a Begonia acetosella; b, c Toxicodendron vernicifluum; d Gnetum montanum; e Vaccinium gaultheriifolium; f Fagopyrum dibotrys
Fig. 8a Multiple uses of WEPs; b Number of plant species for each CFSI groups
Evaluation of wild edibles using CFSI and RFC index
| Species names | Vernacular name | Indices | Ranking | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFSI | RFC | CFSI | RFC | ||
| dong qi | 4088 | 89 | 1 | 2 | |
| a lei | 1961 | 61 | 2 | 8 | |
| a bo | 1837 | 81 | 3 | 3 | |
| dong ka | 1265 | 54 | 4 | 12 | |
| gui | 1190 | 45 | 5 | 17 | |
| meng | 823.2 | 56 | 6 | 11 | |
| b ri | 638.4 | 57 | 7 | 10 | |
| na ba | 606.4 | 77 | 8 | 4 | |
| xi wa an | 604.7 | 43 | 9 | 18 | |
| mei leng | 579.2 | 99 | 10 | 1 | |
| ying | 399.0 | 38 | 11 | 21 | |
| bang a | 273.8 | 73 | 12 | 5 | |
| dao | 262.5 | 70 | 13 | 6 | |
| se you can | 218.8 | 40 | 14 | 20 | |
| de wa | 178.5 | 51 | 15 | 13 | |
| ki | 173.3 | 22 | 16 | 29 | |
| e jing | 126.0 | 16 | 17 | 34 | |
| reng dong | 108.0 | 12 | 18 | 47 | |
| na bu gan | 87.75 | 50 | 19 | 14 | |
| zong | 78.75 | 42 | 20 | 19 | |
| a ga | 73.13 | 65 | 21 | 7 | |
| de ki | 60.75 | 9 | 22 | 56 | |
| ceng | 48.75 | 13 | 23 | 44 | |
| da bu qiu | 48.30 | 46 | 24 | 16 | |
| de leng | 29.25 | 24 | 25 | 26 | |
| si meng | 24.75 | 11 | 26 | 53 | |
| dong | 24.38 | 13 | 27 | 40 | |
Jaccard similarity index (JI) for local and neighboring countries
| Nationality | Study area | Indices | JI | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | ||||
| Tibetan | Shangri-la region | 148 | 168 | 34 | 12.06 | [ |
| Naxi | Lijiang area | 148 | 173 | 16 | 5.25 | [ |
| Lhoba | Longzi County | 148 | 55 | 5 | 2.53 | [ |
| Monpa | Mêdog County | 148 | 194 | 23 | 7.21 | [ |
| —— | Nepal | 148 | 132 | 4 | 1.45 | [ |
| —— | Western Nepal | 148 | 72 | 15 | 7.32 | [ |
| —— | Myanmar | 148 | 81 | 6 | 2.69 | [ |
| —— | Lesser Himalayas-Pakistan | 148 | 44 | 2 | 1.05 | [ |
Fig. 9Comparison of WEPs between Dulong and other ethnic groups in China
One-way analysis of variance
| Characters | Total number of respondents | Average WEPs no. mentions | df | Homogeneity of variance test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.977 | 0.055 | |||
| Male | 75 | 21.9 | |||
| Female | 52 | 19.0 | |||
| 3 | 0.041 | – | |||
| ≤ 19 | 8 | 6.10 | |||
| 20–39 | 59 | 18.0 | |||
| 40–59 | 39 | 22.9 | |||
| ≥ 60 | 21 | 29.9 | |||
| 3 | 0.269 | 0.006 | |||
| Illiterate | 26 | 25.1 | |||
| Primary | 27 | 17.9 | |||
| Secondary | 55 | 21.0 | |||
| high school and above | 19 | 18.1 | |||
| 1 | 0.741 | 0.000 | |||
| Farming | 88 | 22.6 | |||
| Other occupations | 39 | 16.5 | |||
| Near village | 43 | 18.7 | 3 | 0.237 | 0.053 |
| Far village | 84 | 21.8 |
Fig. 10Pairwise comparisons of age and education level. a Occupation; b Education level